Literature DB >> 27512049

Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious.

Yoel Inbar1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27512049      PMCID： PMC5003252          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1608676113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; William J Brady; Diego A Reinero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728
  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Wu Youyou; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reply to Inbar: Contextual sensitivity helps explain the reproducibility gap between social and cognitive psychology.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; William J Brady; Diego A Reinero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones.

Authors:  Marta Serra-Garcia; Uri Gneezy
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments.

Authors:  Adam Altmejd; Anna Dreber; Eskil Forsell; Juergen Huber; Taisuke Imai; Magnus Johannesson; Michael Kirchler; Gideon Nave; Colin Camerer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.

Authors:  Christopher J Bryan; David S Yeager; Joseph M O'Brien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The puzzling relationship between multi-laboratory replications and meta-analyses of the published literature.

Authors:  Molly Lewis; Maya B Mathur; Tyler J VanderWeele; Michael C Frank
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.653

7.  Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data.

Authors:  Andrew Delios; Elena Giulia Clemente; Tao Wu; Hongbin Tan; Yong Wang; Michael Gordon; Domenico Viganola; Zhaowei Chen; Anna Dreber; Magnus Johannesson; Thomas Pfeiffer; Eric Luis Uhlmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.