Literature DB >> 27511217

Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes after TKA using two prostheses with different patellofemoral design features.

Dae Kyung Bae1, Jong Hun Baek1, Kyung Tack Yoon1, Hyuck Sung Son1, Sang Jun Song2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results after TKA using two prostheses with different sagittal patellofemoral design features, including outcomes related to compatibility of the patellofemoral joint.
METHODS: The clinical and radiographic results of 81 patients (100 knees) who underwent TKA using the specific prosthesis (group A) were compared with those in a control group who underwent TKA using the other prosthesis (group B). The presence of anterior knee joint pain, patellar crepitation, and patellar clunk syndrome was also checked.
RESULTS: The function score and maximum flexion angle at the last follow-up were slightly better in group A than those in group B (92.0 ± 2.3 vs. 90.6 ± 4.2) (133.6° ± 8.4° vs. 129.6° ± 11.4°). Anterior knee pain was observed in 6 knees and patellar crepitation in four knees in group A. In group B, these symptoms were observed in 22 knees and 18 knees, respectively. There was no patellar clunk syndrome in either group. The alignment was corrected with satisfactory positioning of components. The patellar height remained unchanged after TKA in the two groups. The differences between preoperative and postoperative patellar tilt angle and patellar translation were small.
CONCLUSION: When comparing the clinical and radiographic results after TKA using two prostheses with different sagittal patellofemoral design features, TKA using the specific prosthesis provided satisfactory results with less clinical symptoms related to the patellofemoral kinematics with TKA using the other prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee; Patellofemoral joint compatibility; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27511217     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4264-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Impact of patellofemoral design on patellofemoral forces and polyethylene stresses.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Peter C Chen; Mark A Kester; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Effect of femoral component design on patellofemoral crepitance and patella clunk syndrome after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin M Frye; Mark W Floyd; Dahn C Pham; John J Feldman; Brian R Hamlin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The John Insall Award: control-matched evaluation of painful patellar Crepitus after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Raymond H Kim; Derek R Johnson; Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; Adrija Sharma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mo Saffarini; Guillaume Demey; Luca Nover; David Dejour
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

5.  Patellofemoral crepitation and clunk following modern, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Juan V Peralta-Molero; Brian P Gladnick; Yuo-Yu Lee; Andres Vergara Ferrer; Stephen Lyman; Alejandro González Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The effect of femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty: Genesis II prosthesis versus Vanguard prosthesis.

Authors:  Chae-Gwan Kong; Se-Wook Park; Hyo Yang; Yong In
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Comparison of the lateral release rates in the press fit condylar prosthesis and the PFC Sigma prosthesis.

Authors:  A Ballantyne; J McKinley; I Brenkel
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  MRI diagnosis of patellar clunk syndrome following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Le Roy Chong; Jack Davis; Steven B Haas; Mark P Figgie; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-01-24

9.  No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years.

Authors:  Stefan J M Breugem; Bas van Ooij; Daniël Haverkamp; Inger N Sierevelt; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The analysis of risk factors in no thumb test in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jee Hyoung Kim; Song Lee; Dong Oh Ko; Chang Wook Yoo; Tae Hwan Chun; Jung Soo Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Se Gu Kang; Yeon Je Lee; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of Clinical Results and Risk of Patellar Injury between Attune and PFC Sigma Knee Systems.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Se Gu Kang; Cheol Hee Park; Dae Kyung Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-01

3.  Comparison of Patellofemoral-Specific Clinical and Radiographic Results after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Patellofemoral Design-Modified Prosthesis and Its Predecessor.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Uk Suh; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-02-02

4.  Factors affecting femoral rotational angle based on the posterior condylar axis in gap-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee.

Authors:  Sung-Sahn Lee; Yong-In Lee; Dong-Uk Kim; Dae-Hee Lee; Young-Wan Moon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.