Literature DB >> 26855943

Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty.

Mo Saffarini1, Guillaume Demey1, Luca Nover1, David Dejour1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare trochlear profiles in recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) models and to determine whether they feature improvements compared to their predecessors. The hypothesis was that recent TKA models have more anatomic trochlear compartments and would display no signs of trochlear dysplasia.
METHODS: The authors analyzed the geometry of the 6 following TKA models using engineering software: PFC and Attune (DePuy), NexGen and Persona (Zimmer), Noetos and KneeTec (Tornier). The mediolateral trochlear profiles were plotted at various flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30° and 45°) to deduce the sulcus angle.
RESULTS: Analysis of sulcus angles reveals general convergence of recent designs towards anatomic values. At 0° of flexion, sulcus angles of recent implant models were between 156.0-157.4°, while those of previous generation models between 154.5-165.5°. At 30° of flexion, sulcus angles of recent models also lie within 145.7-148.6°, but those of previous models are between 149.5-152.0°. All three manufacturers deepened their trochlear profile at 30° of flexion in recent models compared to earlier designs. Sulcus angles converge towards anatomic values but still exceed radiologic signs of dysplasia by 2-5°.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent TKA designs have more anatomic trochlear geometries than earlier TKA models by the same manufacturers, but trochlear compartments still exceed radiologic signs of trochlear dysplasia by 2° to 5°. The hypothesis that recent TKA models display no signs of trochlear dysplasia is therefore refuted. Surgeons should be aware of design limitations to optimize choice of implant and extensor mechanisms alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV geometric implant analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total knee arthroplasty (TKA); component design; femoral trochlea; trochlear dysplasia

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855943      PMCID: PMC4716951          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  47 in total

1.  The sulcus angle and malalignment of the extensor mechanism of the knee.

Authors:  R P Grelsamer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-07

2.  The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove.

Authors:  Yi-Fen Shih; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Patellar shape can be a predisposing factor in patellar instability.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Simone Cerciello; Nicola Maffulli; Mariachiara Di Cesare; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Relationship between three-dimensional geometry of the trochlear groove and in vivo patellar tracking during weight-bearing knee flexion.

Authors:  Kartik M Varadarajan; Andrew A Freiberg; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  Anatomy and malalignment of the patellofemoral joint: its relation to patellofemoral arthrosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arendt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Femoral sulcus angle measurements.

Authors:  A C Merchant
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-12

7.  The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; L A Whiteside; A D Kaiser; M T Milliano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Predictors of recurrent instability after acute patellofemoral dislocation in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Authors:  Laura W Lewallen; Amy L McIntosh; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The painful total knee arthroplasty: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Edward C Brown; Henry D Clarke; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors.

Authors:  W L Healy; S A Wasilewski; R Takei; M Oberlander
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  12 in total

1.  Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Philippe Moewis; Patrick Stein; Heide Boeth; Adam Trepczynski; Philipp von Roth; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes after TKA using two prostheses with different patellofemoral design features.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Jong Hun Baek; Kyung Tack Yoon; Hyuck Sung Son; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Short term patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: Does the implant matter?

Authors:  Ilda B Molloy; Benjamin J Keeney; Michael B Sparks; Nicholas G Paddock; Karl M Koenig; Wayne E Moschetti; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The predictive factors of secondary patellar resurfacing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Florent Franck; Hervé Ouanezar; Alexandre Jacquel; Vincent Pibarot; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Promising early outcomes of a novel anatomic knee system.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Mina A Botros; Rami Madanat; Christian S Nielsen; Charles Bragdon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Implant survival of 3rd-condyle and post-cam posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty are comparable at follow-up > 10 years: a systematic review.

Authors:  David H Dejour; Jacobus H Müller; Mo Saffarini; Michel Timoteo; Pierre Chambat; Gerard Deschamps; Michel P Bonnin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparison of Patellofemoral-Specific Clinical and Radiographic Results after Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Patellofemoral Design-Modified Prosthesis and Its Predecessor.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Uk Suh; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  No reduced patellar loading with latest-generation cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty-a comparative study of Attune and Press-Fit Condylar®.

Authors:  Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Puja Ahmadi; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Design and rationale of the ATtune Knee Outcome Study (ATKOS): multicenter prospective evaluation of a novel uncemented rotating platform knee system.

Authors:  Rachid Rassir; Inger N Sierevelt; Marjolein Schager; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Influence of femoral implant design modification on anterior knee pain and patellar crepitus in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Huang; Yu-Hang Gao; Lu Ding; Bo Liu; Jian-Guo Liu; Xin Qi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.