Literature DB >> 2750859

Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule.

P Petersen1, M Petrick, H Connor, D Conklin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the utility of the 10% rule in hand rehabilitation. The 10% rule states that the dominant hand possesses a 10% greater grip strength than the nondominant hand. This rule has been used for many years to assist therapists in setting strength goals for patients with injured hands. The sample for this study consisted of 310 male and female students, faculty, and staff from a small, private liberal arts college located in Pennsylvania. Grip strength was measured with a factory-calibrated Jamar dynamometer. Results showed an overall 10.74% grip strength difference between dominant and nondominant hands. This finding verified the 10% rule. However, when the data were separated into left-handed and right-handed subjects, a 12.72% difference for right-handed subjects and a -0.08% difference for left-handed subjects was found. In conclusion, this study showed that the 10% rule is valid for right-handed persons only; for left-handed persons, grip strength should be considered equivalent in both hands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2750859     DOI: 10.5014/ajot.43.7.444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  67 in total

1.  Correlation of return to work outcomes and hand impairment measures among workers with traumatic hand injury.

Authors:  Jer-Hao Chang; Mingyi Wu; Chia-Ling Lee; Yue-Liang Guo; Haw-Yen Chiu
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

2.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Comparison between estimates of hand volume and hand strengths with sex and age with and without anthropometric data in healthy working people.

Authors:  N Chau; D Pétry; E Bourgkard; P Huguenin; E Remy; J M André
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reactive neuromuscular training for the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: a case report.

Authors:  G Cook; L Burton; K Fields
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Time and frequency analysis of EMG signals of homologous elbow flexors and extensors.

Authors:  M Bilodeau; A B Arsenault; D Gravel; D Bourbonnais
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tenodesis Versus No Stabilization After Wide Resection of Distal Ulna Giant Cell Tumors.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Olga D Savvidou; George D Chloros; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Vasileios A Kontogeorgakos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-28

8.  What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength?

Authors:  Jae Kwang Kim; Min Gyue Park; Sung Joon Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Handedness and cognitive function in older men and women: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  B Siengthai; D Kritz-Silverstein; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Is handedness just response bias?

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.