Jenny Oddstig1, Cecilia Hindorf1, Fredrik Hedeer2, Jonas Jögi2, Håkan Arheden2, Magnus J Hansson2, Henrik Engblom3. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 2. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. 3. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. henrik.engblom@med.lu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Large body size can cause a higher proportion of emitted photons being attenuated within the patient. Therefore, clinical myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) protocols often include unproportionally higher radioisotope activity to obese patients. The aim was to evaluate if a linear weight-adjusted low-dose protocol can be applied to obese patients and thereby decrease radiation exposure. METHODS AND RESULT: Two hundred patients (>110 kg, BMI 18-41, [n = 69], ≤ 110 kg, BMI 31-58, [n = 131]) underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin stress examination on a Cadmium Zinc Telluride or a conventional gamma camera using new generations of reconstruction algorithm (Resolution Recovery). Patients <110 kg were administered 2.5 MBq/kg, patients between 110 and 120 kg received 430 MBq and patients >120 kg received 570 MBq according to clinical routine. Patients >110 kg had 130% total number of counts in the images compared to patients <110 kg. Recalculating the counts to correspond to an administered activity of 2.5 MBq/kg resulted in similar number of counts across the groups. Image analyses in a subgroup with images corresponding to high activity and 2.5 MBq/kg showed no difference in image quality or ischemia quantification. CONCLUSION: Linear low-dose weight-adjusted protocol of 2.5 MBq/kg in MPS can be applied over a large weight span without loss of counts or image quality, resulting in a significant reduction in radiation exposure to obese patients.
BACKGROUND: Large body size can cause a higher proportion of emitted photons being attenuated within the patient. Therefore, clinical myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) protocols often include unproportionally higher radioisotope activity to obesepatients. The aim was to evaluate if a linear weight-adjusted low-dose protocol can be applied to obesepatients and thereby decrease radiation exposure. METHODS AND RESULT: Two hundred patients (>110 kg, BMI 18-41, [n = 69], ≤ 110 kg, BMI 31-58, [n = 131]) underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin stress examination on a Cadmium Zinc Telluride or a conventional gamma camera using new generations of reconstruction algorithm (Resolution Recovery). Patients <110 kg were administered 2.5 MBq/kg, patients between 110 and 120 kg received 430 MBq and patients >120 kg received 570 MBq according to clinical routine. Patients >110 kg had 130% total number of counts in the images compared to patients <110 kg. Recalculating the counts to correspond to an administered activity of 2.5 MBq/kg resulted in similar number of counts across the groups. Image analyses in a subgroup with images corresponding to high activity and 2.5 MBq/kg showed no difference in image quality or ischemia quantification. CONCLUSION: Linear low-dose weight-adjusted protocol of 2.5 MBq/kg in MPS can be applied over a large weight span without loss of counts or image quality, resulting in a significant reduction in radiation exposure to obesepatients.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rory Hachamovitch; Sean Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Leslee J Shaw; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H William Strauss; D Douglas Miller; Mark D Wittry; Manuel D Cerqueira; Ernest V Garcia; Abdulmassi S Iskandrian; Heinrich R Schelbert; Frans J Wackers; Helena R Balon; Otto Lang; Josef Machac Journal: J Nucl Med Technol Date: 2008-08-14
Authors: Sanjiv S Gambhir; Daniel S Berman; Jack Ziffer; Michael Nagler; Martin Sandler; Jim Patton; Brian Hutton; Tali Sharir; Shlomo Ben Haim; Simona Ben Haim Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-02-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joris D van Dijk; Pieter L Jager; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Cornelis H Slump; Jaep de Boer; Adrianus H J Oostdijk; Jorn A van Dalen Journal: J Nucl Med Technol Date: 2015-01-22
Authors: Albert Juan Ramon; Yongyi Yang; P Hendrik Pretorius; Karen L Johnson; Michael A King; Miles N Wernick Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: P Hendrik Pretorius; Albert Juan Ramon; Michael A King; Arda Konik; Seth T Dahlberg; Mathew W Parker; Naomi F Botkin; Karen L Johnson; Yongyi Yang; Miles N Wernick Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Albert Juan Ramon; Yongyi Yang; P Hendrik Pretorius; Karen L Johnson; Michael A King; Miles N Wernick Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 11.037