Paul E Etcheverry1, Andrew J Waters2, Cho Lam3, Virmarie Correa-Fernandez4, Jennifer Irvin Vidrine5, Paul M Cinciripini6, David W Wetter3. 1. Department of Psychology. 2. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. 3. Department of Psychology, Rice University. 4. Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston. 5. Stephenson Cancer Center. 6. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether initial orienting (IO) and inability to disengage (ITD) attention from negative affective stimuli moderate the association of negative affect with smoking abstinence during a quit attempt. METHOD: Data were from a longitudinal cohort study of smoking cessation (N = 424). A negative affect modified Stroop task was administered 1 week before and on quit day to measure IO and ITD. Ecological Momentary Assessments were used to create negative affect intercepts and linear slopes for the week before quitting and on quit day. Quit day and long-term abstinence measures were collected. RESULTS: Continuation ratio logit model analyses found significant interactions for prequit negative affect slope with prequit ITD, odds ratio (OR) = 0.738 (0.57, 0.96), p = .02, and for quit day negative affect intercept with quit day ITD, OR = 0.62 (0.41, 950), p = .03, predicting abstinence. The Prequit Negative Affect Intercept × Prequit IO interaction predicting quit day abstinence was significant, OR = 1.42 (1.06, 1.90), p = .02, as was the Quit Day Negative Affect Slope × Quit Day IO interaction predicting long-term abstinence, OR = 1.45 (1.02, 2.08), p = .04. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that the association of negative affect with smoking abstinence would be moderated by ITD was generally supported. Among individuals with high ITD, negative affect was inversely related to abstinence, but unrelated to abstinence among individuals with lower levels of ITD. Unexpectedly, among individuals with low IO, negative affect was inversely related to abstinence, but unrelated to abstinence among individuals with higher levels of ITD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether initial orienting (IO) and inability to disengage (ITD) attention from negative affective stimuli moderate the association of negative affect with smoking abstinence during a quit attempt. METHOD: Data were from a longitudinal cohort study of smoking cessation (N = 424). A negative affect modified Stroop task was administered 1 week before and on quit day to measure IO and ITD. Ecological Momentary Assessments were used to create negative affect intercepts and linear slopes for the week before quitting and on quit day. Quit day and long-term abstinence measures were collected. RESULTS: Continuation ratio logit model analyses found significant interactions for prequit negative affect slope with prequit ITD, odds ratio (OR) = 0.738 (0.57, 0.96), p = .02, and for quit day negative affect intercept with quit day ITD, OR = 0.62 (0.41, 950), p = .03, predicting abstinence. The Prequit Negative Affect Intercept × Prequit IO interaction predicting quit day abstinence was significant, OR = 1.42 (1.06, 1.90), p = .02, as was the Quit Day Negative Affect Slope × Quit Day IO interaction predicting long-term abstinence, OR = 1.45 (1.02, 2.08), p = .04. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that the association of negative affect with smoking abstinence would be moderated by ITD was generally supported. Among individuals with high ITD, negative affect was inversely related to abstinence, but unrelated to abstinence among individuals with lower levels of ITD. Unexpectedly, among individuals with low IO, negative affect was inversely related to abstinence, but unrelated to abstinence among individuals with higher levels of ITD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Timothy B Baker; Megan E Piper; Danielle E McCarthy; Matthew R Majeskie; Michael C Fiore Journal: Psychol Rev Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 8.934
Authors: Michael S Businelle; Ping Ma; Darla E Kendzor; Lorraine R Reitzel; Minxing Chen; Cho Y Lam; Ira Bernstein; David W Wetter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Tim M Schoenmakers; Marijn de Bruin; Irja F M Lux; Alexa G Goertz; Dorieke H A T Van Kerkhof; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Claire A Spears; Liang Li; Cai Wu; Christine Vinci; Whitney L Heppner; Diana S Hoover; Cho Lam; David W Wetter Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2019-03-04
Authors: Kara Manning; Daniel J Paulus; Julianna B D Hogan; Julia D Buckner; Samantha G Farris; Michael J Zvolensky Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Isabel Weiss de Souza; Elisa Harumi Kozasa; Luane A Rabello; Beatriz Mattozo; Sarah Bowen; Kimber P Richter; Laisa Marcorela Andreoli Sartes; Ana Regina Noto Journal: Tob Induc Dis Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 2.600