Literature DB >> 19691003

Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect.

Christian Frings1, Julia Englert, Dirk Wentura, Christina Bermeitinger.   

Abstract

The emotional Stroop effect refers to the phenomenon that participants are faster in responding to the ink colour of neutral than of negative word stimuli, possibly reflecting fast and automatic allocation of attention towards negative stimuli. However, this interpretation was challenged by McKenna and Sharma (2004) who found that the emotional Stroop effect reflected a generic slowdown after negative stimuli. In fact, they even found reversed effects in a design in which neutral stimuli more often followed negative stimuli and vice versa. Yet, besides reversing the emotional Stroop effect this contingency might in fact have counteracted the fast effect, which was usually interpreted as the emotional Stroop effect. To decompose the emotional Stroop effect we used a design in which the foregoing and the current valence were uncorrelated and in which the fast and slow effects could be computed independently from each other. We found evidence for both fast and slow effects and discuss the practical implications for researchers using the emotional Stroop task as a measurement and the theoretical implications for researchers interested in the underlying cognitive mechanisms that contribute to the emotional Stroop effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19691003     DOI: 10.1080/17470210903156594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  25 in total

1.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

Review 2.  Counterbalancing in smoking cue research: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Kasey M Griffin; W Michael Sayers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.

Authors:  Anna-Malika Camblats; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-11-09

4.  Conflict Processing is Modulated by Positive Emotion Word Type in Second Language: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Chenggang Wu; Juan Zhang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-10

5.  The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content.

Authors:  Moshe Shay Ben-Haim; Paul Williams; Zachary Howard; Yaniv Mama; Ami Eidels; Daniel Algom
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Lions, tigers, and bears, oh sh!t: Semantics versus tabooness in speech production.

Authors:  Katherine K White; Lise Abrams; Sarah M Koehler; Richard J Collins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 7.  Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Veronika I Mueller; Claudia R Eickhoff; Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers.

Authors:  Kevin A Hallgren; Barbara S McCrady
Journal:  J Behav Health       Date:  2013

9.  Conditioned task-set competition: Neural mechanisms of emotional interference in depression.

Authors:  Aleks Stolicyn; J Douglas Steele; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Attentional bias to negative affect moderates negative affect's relationship with smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Paul E Etcheverry; Andrew J Waters; Cho Lam; Virmarie Correa-Fernandez; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Paul M Cinciripini; David W Wetter
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.