OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to (a) identify and categorize techniques used to modify or manage impulsive processes associated with unhealthy eating behavior, (b) describe the mechanisms targeted by such techniques, and (c) summarize available evidence on the effectiveness of these techniques. METHOD: Searches of 5 bibliographic databases identified studies, published in English since 1993, that evaluated at least 1 technique to modify impulsive processes affecting eating in adults. Data were systematically extracted on study characteristics, population, study quality, intervention techniques, proposed mechanisms of action, and outcomes. Effectiveness evidence was systematically collated and described without meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-two studies evaluated 17 distinct impulse management techniques. They were categorized according to whether they aimed to (a) modify the strength of impulses or (b) engage the reflective system or other resources in identifying, suppressing, or otherwise managing impulses. Although higher quality evidence is needed to draw definitive conclusions, promising changes in unhealthy food consumption and food cravings were observed for visuospatial loading, physical activity, and if-then planning, typically for up to 1-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of techniques have been evaluated and some show promise for use in weight management interventions. However, larger-scale, more methodologically robust, community-based studies with longer follow-up times are needed to establish whether such techniques can have a long-term impact on eating patterns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to (a) identify and categorize techniques used to modify or manage impulsive processes associated with unhealthy eating behavior, (b) describe the mechanisms targeted by such techniques, and (c) summarize available evidence on the effectiveness of these techniques. METHOD: Searches of 5 bibliographic databases identified studies, published in English since 1993, that evaluated at least 1 technique to modify impulsive processes affecting eating in adults. Data were systematically extracted on study characteristics, population, study quality, intervention techniques, proposed mechanisms of action, and outcomes. Effectiveness evidence was systematically collated and described without meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-two studies evaluated 17 distinct impulse management techniques. They were categorized according to whether they aimed to (a) modify the strength of impulses or (b) engage the reflective system or other resources in identifying, suppressing, or otherwise managing impulses. Although higher quality evidence is needed to draw definitive conclusions, promising changes in unhealthy food consumption and food cravings were observed for visuospatial loading, physical activity, and if-then planning, typically for up to 1-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of techniques have been evaluated and some show promise for use in weight management interventions. However, larger-scale, more methodologically robust, community-based studies with longer follow-up times are needed to establish whether such techniques can have a long-term impact on eating patterns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Paul Aveyard; Carmen Piernas; Constantinos Koshiaris; Carmelo Velardo; Dario Salvi; Susan A Jebb Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lisa Macaulay; Catriona O'Dolan; Alison Avenell; Paula Carroll; Seonaidh Cotton; Stephan Dombrowski; Andrew Elders; Beatriz Goulao; Cindy Gray; Fiona M Harris; Kate Hunt; Frank Kee; Graeme MacLennan; Matthew David McDonald; Michelle McKinley; Rebecca Skinner; Claire Torrens; Martin Tod; Katrina Turner; Marjon van der Pol; Pat Hoddinott Journal: Trials Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Simone Rodda; Stephanie S Merkouris; Charles Abraham; David C Hodgins; Sean Cowlishaw; Nicki A Dowling Journal: J Behav Addict Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 6.756
Authors: Peter E H Schwarz; Patrick Timpel; Lorenz Harst; Colin J Greaves; Mohammed K Ali; Jeffrey Lambert; Mary Beth Weber; Mohamad M Almedawar; Henning Morawietz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 24.094