Literature DB >> 27502381

Reconciling agriculture, carbon and biodiversity in a savannah transformation frontier.

L D Estes1, T Searchinger2, M Spiegel3, D Tian3, S Sichinga4, M Mwale4, L Kehoe5, T Kuemmerle6, A Berven3, N Chaney7, J Sheffield3, E F Wood3, K K Caylor3.   

Abstract

Rapidly rising populations and likely increases in incomes in sub-Saharan Africa make tens of millions of hectares of cropland expansion nearly inevitable, even with large increases in crop yields. Much of that expansion is likely to occur in higher rainfall savannas, with substantial costs to biodiversity and carbon storage. Zambia presents an acute example of this challenge, with an expected tripling of population by 2050, good potential to expand maize and soya bean production, and large areas of relatively undisturbed miombo woodland and associated habitat types of high biodiversity value. Here, we present a new model designed to explore the potential for targeting agricultural expansion in ways that achieve quantitatively optimal trade-offs between competing economic and environmental objectives: total converted land area (the reciprocal of potential yield); carbon loss, biodiversity loss and transportation costs. To allow different interests to find potential compromises, users can apply varying weights to examine the effects of their subjective preferences on the spatial allocation of new cropland and its costs. We find that small compromises from the objective to convert the highest yielding areas permit large savings in transportation costs, and the carbon and biodiversity impacts resulting from savannah conversion. For example, transferring just 30% of weight from a yield-maximizing objective equally between carbon and biodiversity protection objectives would increase total cropland area by just 2.7%, but result in avoided costs of 27-47% for carbon, biodiversity and transportation. Compromise solutions tend to focus agricultural expansion along existing transportation corridors and in already disturbed areas. Used appropriately, this type of model could help countries find agricultural expansion alternatives and related infrastructure and land use policies that help achieve production targets while helping to conserve Africa's rapidly transforming savannahs.This article is part of the themed issue 'Tropical grassy biomes: linking ecology, human use and conservation'.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  agriculture; biodiversity; carbon; optimization; savannahs; trade-offs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27502381      PMCID: PMC4978874          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  14 in total

1.  Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.

Authors:  David Tilman; Christian Balzer; Jason Hill; Belinda L Befort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production.

Authors:  Arild Angelsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.

Authors:  Robin Naidoo; Andrew Balmford; Paul J Ferraro; Stephen Polasky; Taylor H Ricketts; Mathieu Rouget
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Using changes in agricultural utility to quantify future climate-induced risk to conservation.

Authors:  Lyndon D Estes; Lydie-Line Paroz; Bethany A Bradley; Jonathan M H Green; David G Hole; Stephen Holness; Guy Ziv; Michael G Oppenheimer; David S Wilcove
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Spatially explicit scenario analysis for reconciling agricultural expansion, forest protection, and carbon conservation in Indonesia.

Authors:  Lian Pin Koh; Jaboury Ghazoul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Predicted impact of barriers to migration on the Serengeti wildebeest population.

Authors:  Ricardo M Holdo; John M Fryxell; Anthony R E Sinclair; Andrew Dobson; Robert D Holt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Mike I Evans; Suhel Quader; Salvatore Aricò; Julius Arinaitwe; Mark Balman; Leon A Bennun; Bastian Bertzky; Charles Besançon; Timothy M Boucher; Thomas M Brooks; Ian J Burfield; Neil D Burgess; Simba Chan; Rob P Clay; Mike J Crosby; Nicholas C Davidson; Naamal De Silva; Christian Devenish; Guy C L Dutson; David F Día Z Fernández; Lincoln D C Fishpool; Claire Fitzgerald; Matt Foster; Melanie F Heath; Marc Hockings; Michael Hoffmann; David Knox; Frank W Larsen; John F Lamoreux; Colby Loucks; Ian May; James Millett; Dominic Molloy; Paul Morling; Mike Parr; Taylor H Ricketts; Nathalie Seddon; Benjamin Skolnik; Simon N Stuart; Amy Upgren; Stephen Woodley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  SoilGrids1km--global soil information based on automated mapping.

Authors:  Tomislav Hengl; Jorge Mendes de Jesus; Robert A MacMillan; Niels H Batjes; Gerard B M Heuvelink; Eloi Ribeiro; Alessandro Samuel-Rosa; Bas Kempen; Johan G B Leenaars; Markus G Walsh; Maria Ruiperez Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  High Resolution, Annual Maps of Field Boundaries for Smallholder-Dominated Croplands at National Scales.

Authors:  Lyndon D Estes; Su Ye; Lei Song; Boka Luo; J Ronald Eastman; Zhenhua Meng; Qi Zhang; Dennis McRitchie; Stephanie R Debats; Justus Muhando; Angeline H Amukoa; Brian W Kaloo; Jackson Makuru; Ben K Mbatia; Isaac M Muasa; Julius Mucha; Adelide M Mugami; Judith M Mugami; Francis W Muinde; Fredrick M Mwawaza; Jeff Ochieng; Charles J Oduol; Purent Oduor; Thuo Wanjiku; Joseph G Wanyoike; Ryan B Avery; Kelly K Caylor
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-25

2.  Tropical grassy biomes: linking ecology, human use and conservation.

Authors:  Caroline E R Lehmann; Catherine L Parr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Multi-objective optimization as a tool to identify possibilities for future agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Lindsay C Todman; Kevin Coleman; Alice E Milne; Juliana D B Gil; Pytrik Reidsma; Marie-Hélène Schwoob; Sébastien Treyer; Andrew P Whitmore
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 7.963

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.