Literature DB >> 27502337

Prediction of histological stage based on cystoscopic appearances of newly diagnosed bladder tumours.

V A During1, G M Sole2, A K Jha2, J A Anderson2, R T Bryan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION In the 75-80% of urothelial bladder cancers (UBC) presenting as non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) is the key treatment and staging procedure. In the 20-25% of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), further cross-sectional imaging is required to complete the staging process before considering radical treatment. Given the adverse effects of ionising radiation, clinicians identify patients believed to have MIBC, and so requiring further imaging pre-TURBT, at the tumour histology/stage based on the tumour's visual characteristics. There is minimal evidence describing the accuracy of such predictions in newly-diagnosed patients. METHODS Over a 6-year period, a database of patients undergoing resection of newly-diagnosed bladder lesions in a single UK centre was prospectively established. Predictions based on histology were simultaneously recorded, and the accuracy of these predictions of histology/stage subsequently assessed. RESULTS One hundred and twenty two (73.1%) patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC had predictions recorded versus 45 (26.9%) patients with MIBC. Visual assessment predictions of MIBC had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.5%-95.2%) and a specificity of 91.0% (95% CI 84.6%-94.9%), giving a positive predictive value of 78.4% (95% CI 65.4%-87.5%) and a negative predictive value of 95.7% (95% CI 90.3%-98.1%). CONCLUSIONS We find that visual assessment is accurate in predicting the presence of MIBC. This supports the practice of stratifying patients at the time of initial cystoscopy for those requiring further radiological staging pre-TURBT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystoscopy; Transitional cell carcinoma; Urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27502337      PMCID: PMC5392893          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  21 in total

1.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Diagnostic efficacy of [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional computed tomography in lymph node staging of patients with bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Michael Souvatzoglou; Hubert Kübler; Katharina Opercan; Stefan Schmidt; Ken Herrmann; Jens Stollfuss; Gregor Weirich; Bernhard Haller; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Bernd J Krause; Uwe Treiber
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013.

Authors:  Marko Babjuk; Maximilian Burger; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Bas W G van Rhijn; Eva Compérat; Richard J Sylvester; Eero Kaasinen; Andreas Böhle; Joan Palou Redorta; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Extravesical tumor implantation caused by perforation during transurethral resection of a bladder tumor: a case report.

Authors:  N Ohguchi; N Sakaida; A Okamura; S Kawakita; H Kawamura; T Matsuda
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  A comparison of patient and tumour characteristics in two UK bladder cancer cohorts separated by 20 years.

Authors:  Richard T Bryan; Maurice P Zeegers; Eline H van Roekel; Deborah Bird; Margaret R Grant; Janet A Dunn; Sarah Bathers; Gulnaz Iqbal; Humera S Khan; Stuart I Collins; Andrew Howman; Nayneeta S Deshmukh; Nicholas D James; Kar Keung Cheng; D Michael A Wallace
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  FDG-PET/CT for the preoperative lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Greet Swinnen; Alex Maes; Hans Pottel; Alain Vanneste; Ignace Billiet; Karl Lesage; Patrick Werbrouck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  MR imaging of urinary bladder cancer for T-staging: a review and a pictorial essay of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Mitsuru Takeuchi; Shigeru Sasaki; Taku Naiki; Noriyasu Kawai; Kenjiro Kohri; Masaki Hara; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes; Eva Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Georgios Gakis; Thierry Lebret; Maria J Ribal; Antoine G Van der Heijden; Amir Sherif
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Bladder cancer.

Authors:  Donald S Kaufman; William U Shipley; Adam S Feldman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder can distinguish between residual tumour and post-chemotherapy effect.

Authors:  Stephanie B Donaldson; Suzanne C Bonington; Lucy E Kershaw; Richard Cowan; Jeanette Lyons; Tony Elliott; Bernadette M Carrington
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  Poster Exhibit 2: Non-prostate Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The value of surgeon's perception during transurethral resection of bladder tumors: can we trust in our eyes and experience to predict grade and staging?

Authors:  Luís Vale; José Sousa; Pedro Abreu-Mendes; Pedro Vale; Nuno Dias; Paulo Dinis; Tiago Antunes-Lopes; João Silva
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2022-09-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.