OBJECTIVES: To compare patient and tumour characteristics at presentation from two large bladder cancer cohorts, with recruitment separated by 15-20 years To identify significant differences in the West Midlands' urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB) population during this period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 1478 patients newly diagnosed with UCB in the West Midlands from January 1991 to June 1992 (Cohort 1), and from 1168 patients newly diagnosed with UBC within the same region from December 2005 to April 2011 (Cohort 2). Gender, age, smoking history, and tumour grade, stage, type, multiplicity and size at presentation were compared using a Pearson chi-square test or Cochran-Armitage trend test, as appropriate. RESULT: Cohort 2 had a higher proportion of male patients (P = 0.021), elderly patients (P < 0.001), grade 3 tumours (P < 0.001), Ta/T1 tumours (P = 0.008), multiple tumours (P < 0.001), and tumours of ≤2 cm in diameter (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences between the cohorts. These differences are potentially explained by an ageing population, changes in grading practices, improved awareness of important symptoms, improved cystoscopic technology, and reductions in treatment delays. Regional cohorts remain important for identifying changes in tumour and patient characteristics that may influence disease management in the UK and beyond.
OBJECTIVES: To compare patient and tumour characteristics at presentation from two large bladder cancer cohorts, with recruitment separated by 15-20 years To identify significant differences in the West Midlands' urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB) population during this period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 1478 patients newly diagnosed with UCB in the West Midlands from January 1991 to June 1992 (Cohort 1), and from 1168 patients newly diagnosed with UBC within the same region from December 2005 to April 2011 (Cohort 2). Gender, age, smoking history, and tumour grade, stage, type, multiplicity and size at presentation were compared using a Pearson chi-square test or Cochran-Armitage trend test, as appropriate. RESULT: Cohort 2 had a higher proportion of male patients (P = 0.021), elderly patients (P < 0.001), grade 3 tumours (P < 0.001), Ta/T1 tumours (P = 0.008), multiple tumours (P < 0.001), and tumours of ≤2 cm in diameter (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences between the cohorts. These differences are potentially explained by an ageing population, changes in grading practices, improved awareness of important symptoms, improved cystoscopic technology, and reductions in treatment delays. Regional cohorts remain important for identifying changes in tumour and patient characteristics that may influence disease management in the UK and beyond.
Authors: Alexander C Dowell; Ellen Cobby; Kaisheng Wen; Adam J Devall; Vinnie During; Jane Anderson; Nicholas D James; Kar K Cheng; Maurice P Zeegers; Richard T Bryan; Graham S Taylor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Frits H M van Osch; Sylvia H J Jochems; Raoul C Reulen; Sarah J Pirrie; Duncan Nekeman; Anke Wesselius; Nicholas D James; D Michael A Wallace; K K Cheng; Frederik J van Schooten; Richard T Bryan; Maurice P Zeegers Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Frits H M van Osch; Duncan Nekeman; Neil K Aaronson; Lucinda J Billingham; Nicholas D James; K K Cheng; Richard T Bryan; Maurice P Zeegers Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Evan Yi-Wen Yu; Duncan Nekeman; Lucinda J Billingham; Nicholas D James; K K Cheng; Richard T Bryan; Anke Wesselius; Maurice P Zeegers Journal: BJU Int Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Frits H M van Osch; Jelle Vlaanderen; Sylvia H J Jochems; Cristina Bosetti; Jerry Polesel; Stefano Porru; Angela Carta; Klaus Golka; Xuejuan Jiang; Mariana C Stern; Wei-De Zhong; Eliane Kellen; Hermann Pohlabeln; Li Tang; James Marshall; Gunnar Steineck; Margaret R Karagas; Kenneth C Johnson; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Jack A Taylor; Carlo La Vecchia; Richard T Bryan; Frederik J van Schooten; Anke Wesselius; Maurice P Zeegers Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Nada Humayun-Zakaria; Roland Arnold; Anshita Goel; Douglas Ward; Stuart Savill; Richard T Bryan Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 5.923