Literature DB >> 19477579

FDG-PET/CT for the preoperative lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer.

Greet Swinnen1, Alex Maes, Hans Pottel, Alain Vanneste, Ignace Billiet, Karl Lesage, Patrick Werbrouck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Locoregional lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in patients with bladder cancer. Multimodal treatment, depending on preoperative stage, may improve survival. The standard imaging modalities for staging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) have an accuracy range of 70-90% for lymph node staging. A more accurate preoperative diagnostic test could improve survival rates even more.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of 2-deoxy-2 [F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with CT (FDG-PET/CT) can increase the reliability of preoperative lymph node staging in patients with nonmetastatic invasive bladder cancer (T2 or higher, M0) or recurrent high-risk superficial disease (T1G3 with or without Tis, M0). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one patients underwent a preoperative FDG-PET/CT between April 2004 and December 2007. Independent of the result for lymph node status, all patients underwent a radical cystectomy and an extended lymphadenectomy. The FDG-PET/CT and CT results were compared with the definitive pathologic results. MEASUREMENTS: Among the 51 patients, 13 patients had metastatically involved locoregional lymph nodes, diagnosed on histopathology. In six patients, these nodes demonstrated increased FDG uptake on PET. In seven patients, PET/CT did not diagnose the positive lymph nodes. PET/CT was false positive in one patient. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: For the diagnosis of node-positive disease, the accuracy, the sensitivity, and the specificity of FDG-PET/CT were 84%, 46%, and 97%, respectively. When analysing the results of CT alone, there was accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 46%, and specificity of 92%. The use of FDG-PET/CT is hampered by technical limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantage for combined FDG-PET/CT over CT alone for lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer or recurrent high-risk superficial disease.
Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477579     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  40 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative Imaging for Clinical Staging Prior to Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Cory M Hugen; Vinay Duddalwar; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Initial results with (11)C-acetate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the staging of urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Seng C Ong; Victor E Reuter; Shangde Cai; Eva Burnazi; Guido Dalbagni; Steven M Larson; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Comparing RECIST with EORTC criteria in metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hakan Öztürk
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Diagnostic value of [18F] FDG-PET and PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huojun Zhang; Wei Xing; Qinqin Kang; Chao Chen; Linhui Wang; Jianping Lu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-26

5.  Should we spare neoadjuvant chemotherapy in low-risk muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients scheduled for radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Günter Niegisch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

6.  Comparative sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in staging bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Crozier; Nathan Papa; Marlon Perera; Brian Ngo; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Clinical value of fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Jamie Riches; Heiko Schöder; Oguz Akin; Alisa Trout; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Update on use of enhanced imaging to optimize lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for urothelial cancer of the bladder.

Authors:  Lukas Lusuardi; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: definition, treatment and future efforts.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; G Joel Decastro; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  [Functional imaging in bladder cancer].

Authors:  T Maurer; T Horn; A J Beer; M Eiber; J E Gschwend
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.