Andrew J Schoenfeld1, Wei Jiang, Mitchel B Harris, Zara Cooper, Tracey Koehlmoos, Peter A Learn, Joel S Weissman, Adil H Haider. 1. *Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA †Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ‡Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD §Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare disparities in postoperative outcomes for African Americans after surgical intervention in the universally insured military system, versus the civilian setting in California. BACKGROUND: Health reform proponents cite the reduction of disparities for African Americans and minorities as an expected benefit. The impact of universal health insurance on reducing surgical disparities for African Americans has not previously been examined. METHODS: We used Department of Defense health insurance (Tricare) data (2006-2010) to measure outcomes for African Americans as compared with Whites after 12 major surgical procedures across multiple specialties. The experience of African Americans in the Tricare system was compared with a similar cohort undergoing surgery in the state of California using the State Inpatient Database (2007-2011). RESULTS: No significant difference in postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81, 1.03] or mortality (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.43, 2.25) were encountered between African Americans and Whites receiving surgery at hospitals administered by the Department of Defense. African Americans in California who were uninsured or on Medicaid had significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 4.76; 95% CI 2.82, 8.05), complications (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.34, 2.08), failure to rescue (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.25, 5.94), and readmission (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.45, 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: In the equal access military healthcare system, African Americans have outcomes similar to Whites. Disparities were evident in California, especially among those without private insurance. These facts point toward the potential benefits of a federally administered system in which all patients are treated uniformly.
OBJECTIVE: To compare disparities in postoperative outcomes for African Americans after surgical intervention in the universally insured military system, versus the civilian setting in California. BACKGROUND: Health reform proponents cite the reduction of disparities for African Americans and minorities as an expected benefit. The impact of universal health insurance on reducing surgical disparities for African Americans has not previously been examined. METHODS: We used Department of Defense health insurance (Tricare) data (2006-2010) to measure outcomes for African Americans as compared with Whites after 12 major surgical procedures across multiple specialties. The experience of African Americans in the Tricare system was compared with a similar cohort undergoing surgery in the state of California using the State Inpatient Database (2007-2011). RESULTS: No significant difference in postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81, 1.03] or mortality (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.43, 2.25) were encountered between African Americans and Whites receiving surgery at hospitals administered by the Department of Defense. African Americans in California who were uninsured or on Medicaid had significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 4.76; 95% CI 2.82, 8.05), complications (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.34, 2.08), failure to rescue (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.25, 5.94), and readmission (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.45, 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: In the equal access military healthcare system, African Americans have outcomes similar to Whites. Disparities were evident in California, especially among those without private insurance. These facts point toward the potential benefits of a federally administered system in which all patients are treated uniformly.
Authors: Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Jeffrey K Lange; Linda M Pak; Justin A Blucher; Lauren B Barton; Daniel J Sturgeon; Tracey Koehlmoos; Adil H Haider; Andrew J Schoenfeld Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Andrew J Schoenfeld; Heeren Makanji; Wei Jiang; Tracey Koehlmoos; Christopher M Bono; Adil H Haider Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Andrew J Schoenfeld; Wei Jiang; Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Rebecca E Scully; Tracey Koehlmoos; Adil H Haider Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Kristin A Sonderman; Lindsey L Wolf; Lindsey B Armstrong; Kathryn Taylor; Wei Jiang; Brent R Weil; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Robert L Ricca; Christopher B Weldon; Adil H Haider; Samuel E Rice-Townsend Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Emily Grenn; Matthew Kutcher; William B Hillegass; Chinenye Iwuchukwu; Amber Kyle; Stephen Bruehl; Burel Goodin; Hector Myers; Uma Rao; Subodh Nag; Kerry Kinney; Harrison Dickens; Matthew C Morris Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Rebecca E Scully; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Wei Jiang; Stuart Lipsitz; Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Peter A Learn; Tracey Koehlmoos; Adil H Haider; Louis L Nguyen Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Jason D Young; Edward C Dee; Adele Levine; Daniel J Sturgeon; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Andrew J Schoenfeld Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 4.755