Literature DB >> 31823324

Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: Do Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Enrolled Patients Receive the Same Care?

Amanda Fazzalari1,2, Natalie Pozzi3, David Alfego4, Qiming Shi4, Nathaniel Erskine5, Gary Tourony6, Jomol Mathew7, Demetrius Litwin5, Mitchell A Cahan5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nationally, Medicaid enrollees with emergency surgical conditions experience worse outcomes overall when compared with privately insured patients. The goal of this study is to investigate disparities in the treatment of cholecystitis based on insurance type and to identify contributing factors.
METHODS: Adults with cholecystitis at a safety-net hospital in Central Massachusetts from 2017-2018 were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were compared based on Medicaid enrollment status (Medicare excluded). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the frequency of surgery, time to surgery (TTS), length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates between groups.
RESULTS: The sample (n = 203) included 69 Medicaid enrollees (34%), with a mean age of 44.4 years. Medicaid enrollees were younger (p = 0.0006), had lower levels of formal education (high school diploma attainment, p < 0.0001), were more likely to be unmarried (p < 0.0001), Non-White (p = 0.0012), and require an interpreter (p < 0.0001). Patients in both groups experienced similar rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TTS, and LOS; however, Medicaid enrollees experienced more readmissions within 30 days of discharge (30.4% vs 17.9%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Despite anticipated population differences, the treatment of acute cholecystitis was similar between Medicaid and Non-Medicaid enrollees, with the exception of readmission. Further research is needed to identify patient, provider, and/or population factors driving this disparity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystitis; Disparities; Emergency general surgery; Medicaid

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31823324     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04471-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  35 in total

1.  A composite index for predicting readmission following emergency general surgery.

Authors:  Gajanthan Muthuvel; Sarah E Tevis; Amy E Liepert; Suresh K Agarwal; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Statewide assessment of surgical outcomes and the acute care surgery model.

Authors:  Nicholas L Bandy; Sarah C DeShields; Tina D Cunningham; Rebecca C Britt
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  Robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yeqian Huang; Terence C Chua; Guy J Maddern; Jaswinder S Samra
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Association of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion With Access to and Quality of Care for Surgical Conditions.

Authors:  Andrew P. Loehrer; David C. Chang; John W. Scott; Matthew M. Hutter; Virendra I. Patel; Jeffrey E. Lee; Benjamin D. Sommers
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Treatment of appendicitis: Do Medicaid and non-Medicaid-enrolled patients receive the same care?

Authors:  Amanda Fazzalari; Natalie Pozzi; David Alfego; Nathaniel Erskine; Qiming Shi; Gary Tourony; Jomol Mathew; Demetrius Litwin; Mitchell A Cahan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Racial Disparities in Access and Outcomes of Cholecystectomy in the United States.

Authors:  John V Gahagan; Mark H Hanna; Matthew D Whealon; Steven Maximus; Michael J Phelan; Michael Lekawa; Cristobal Barrios; Nicole P Bernal
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  The association of lacking insurance with outcomes of severe sepsis: retrospective analysis of an administrative database*.

Authors:  Gagan Kumar; Amit Taneja; Tilottama Majumdar; Elizabeth R Jacobs; Jeff Whittle; Rahul Nanchal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Nitin Jain; Lesley H Curtis; Daniel Oertli; Michael Heberer; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Massachusetts health care reform and reduced racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Andrew P Loehrer; Zirui Song; Hugh G Auchincloss; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Defining Rates and Risk Factors for Readmissions Following Emergency General Surgery.

Authors:  Joaquim M Havens; Olubode A Olufajo; Zara R Cooper; Adil H Haider; Adil A Shah; Ali Salim
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 14.766

View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of socioeconomic status on telemedicine utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic among surgical clinics at an academic tertiary care center.

Authors:  Jay Zhu; Alex W Lois; Baraka Gitonga; Judy Y Chen-Meekin; Estell J Williams; Saurabh Khandelwal; Rocio Carrera Ceron; Brant K Oelschlager; Andrew S Wright
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.