Literature DB >> 27500277

Tuning the selectivity and sensitivity of an OmpG nanopore sensor by adjusting ligand tether length.

Monifa A Fahie1, Bib Yang2, Bach Pham2, Min Chen1.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that a biotin ligand tethered to the rim of an OmpG nanopore can be used to detect biotin-binding proteins. Here, we investigate the effect of the length of the polyethylene glycol tether on the nanopore's sensitivity and selectivity. When the tether length was increased from 2 to 45 ethylene repeats, sensitivity decreased substantially for a neutral protein streptavidin and slightly for a positively charged protein (avidin). In addition, we found that two distinct avidin binding conformations were possible when using a long tether. These conformations were sensitive to the salt concentration and applied voltage. Finally, a longer tether resulted in reduced sensitivity due to slower association for a monoclonal anti-biotin antibody. Our results highlight the importance of electrostatic, electroosmotic and electrophoretic forces on nanopore binding kinetics and sensor readout.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OmpG; antibody; biotin; nanopore; sensing; streptavidin

Year:  2016        PMID: 27500277      PMCID: PMC4972499          DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Sens        ISSN: 2379-3694            Impact factor:   7.711


  59 in total

1.  Ion-beam sculpting at nanometre length scales.

Authors:  J Li; D Stein; C McMullan; D Branton; M J Aziz; J A Golovchenko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Imaging alpha-hemolysin with molecular dynamics: ionic conductance, osmotic permeability, and the electrostatic potential map.

Authors:  Aleksij Aksimentiev; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Protein biosensors based on biofunctionalized conical gold nanotubes.

Authors:  Zuzanna Siwy; Lacramioara Trofin; Punit Kohli; Lane A Baker; Christina Trautmann; Charles R Martin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A genetically encoded pore for the stochastic detection of a protein kinase.

Authors:  Stephen Cheley; Hongzhi Xie; Hagan Bayley
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.164

5.  A universal strategy for aptamer-based nanopore sensing through host-guest interactions inside α-hemolysin.

Authors:  Ting Li; Lei Liu; Yuru Li; Jiani Xie; Hai-Chen Wu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Electrostatic Interactions between OmpG Nanopore and Analyte Protein Surface Can Distinguish between Glycosylated Isoforms.

Authors:  Monifa A Fahie; Min Chen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Polymer capture by electro-osmotic flow of oppositely charged nanopores.

Authors:  C T A Wong; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient.

Authors:  Meni Wanunu; Will Morrison; Yitzhak Rabin; Alexander Y Grosberg; Amit Meller
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Unfoldase-mediated protein translocation through an α-hemolysin nanopore.

Authors:  Jeff Nivala; Douglas B Marks; Mark Akeson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Nanopore sensing of botulinum toxin type B by discriminating an enzymatically cleaved Peptide from a synaptic protein synaptobrevin 2 derivative.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Vedrana Montana; Vladimir Grubišić; Randy F Stout; Vladimir Parpura; Li-Qun Gu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 9.229

View more
  13 in total

1.  A Nanopore Approach for Analysis of Caspase-7 Activity in Cell Lysates.

Authors:  Bach Pham; Scott J Eron; Maureen E Hill; Xin Li; Monifa A Fahie; Jeanne A Hardy; Min Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Nanopore Sensing.

Authors:  Wenqing Shi; Alicia K Friedman; Lane A Baker
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Rapid and Accurate Determination of Nanopore Ionic Current Using a Steric Exclusion Model.

Authors:  James Wilson; Kumar Sarthak; Wei Si; Luyu Gao; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 7.711

4.  Mechanism of OmpG pH-Dependent Gating from Loop Ensemble and Single Channel Studies.

Authors:  Alan Perez-Rathke; Monifa A Fahie; Christina Chisholm; Jie Liang; Min Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Modifying the pH sensitivity of OmpG nanopore for improved detection at acidic pH.

Authors:  Monifa A V Fahie; Fanjun Li; Carolyn Palmer; Connie Yoon; Min Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Fast slow folding of an outer membrane porin.

Authors:  Eve E Weatherill; Monifa A Fahie; David P Marshall; Rachel A Andvig; Matthew R Cheetham; Min Chen; Mark I Wallace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  Advanced Nanoscale Approaches to Single-(Bio)entity Sensing and Imaging.

Authors:  Marta Maria Pereira da Silva Neves; Daniel Martín-Yerga
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-26

8.  A pH-independent quiet OmpG pore with enhanced electrostatic repulsion among the extracellular loops.

Authors:  Bach Pham; Christina M Chisholm; Joshua Foster; Emily Friis; Monifa A Fahie; Min Chen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Insertion state of modular protein nanopores into a membrane.

Authors:  Motahareh Ghahari Larimi; Jeung-Hoi Ha; Stewart N Loh; Liviu Movileanu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.747

10.  Current Blockades of Proteins inside Nanopores for Real-Time Metabolome Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Zernia; Nieck Jordy van der Heide; Nicole Stéphanie Galenkamp; Giorgos Gouridis; Giovanni Maglia
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.