Literature DB >> 27496276

High frequency ultrasound to assess skin thickness in healthy adults.

T J S Van Mulder1, M de Koeijer2, H Theeten3, D Willems2, P Van Damme3, M Demolder4, G De Meyer4, K C L Beyers5, V Vankerckhoven6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intradermal immunization is gaining increased attention due to multiple factors: (1) intradermal (ID) vaccination has been shown to induce improved immunogenicity compared to intramuscular (IM) vaccination; (2) ID vaccination has been shown to have a dose-sparing potential over IM leading to a reduced vaccine cost and an increased availability of vaccines worldwide. However, the currently used Mantoux technique for ID injection is difficult to standardize and requires training. The aim of the study was (1) to assess the epidermal and dermal thickness at the proximal ventral and dorsal forearm (PVF & PDF) and deltoid in adults aged 18-65years (2) to determine the maximum penetration depth and needle characteristics for the development of a platform of medical devices suited for intradermal injection, VAX-ID™.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mean thickness of the PVF, PDF and deltoid were measured using high-frequency ultrasound of healthy adults aged 18-65years. Correlation with gender, age and BMI was assessed using Mann-Whitney U Test, Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, respectively.
RESULTS: Results showed an overall mean skin thickness of 1.19mm (0.65-1.55mm) at the PVF, 1.44mm (0.78-1.84mm) at the PDF, and 2.12mm (1,16-3.19mm) at the deltoid. Thickness of PVF &amp; PDF and deltoid were significantly different for men vs women (pmean<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and pmin<0.001, 0.012, <0.001, respectively). A significant association was found for age at the deltoid region (p<0.001). Skin thickness for PVF, PDF &amp; deltoid was significantly associated to BMI (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Significant differences in skin thickness were seen for the PVF, PDF and deltoid region for gender, and BMI. Age only influenced the skin thickness at deltoid region. A needle length of 1.0mm is best option for intradermal injection at the dorsal forearm (NCT02363465).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Injection device; Intradermal; Skin thickness; Vaccine delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27496276     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of Forces in Intradermal Injection Devices: Hydrodynamic Versus Human Factors.

Authors:  Stijn Verwulgen; Koen Beyers; Timothi Van Mulder; Thomas Peeters; Steven Truijen; Francis Dams; Vanessa Vankerckhoven
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Translational optical coherence elastography for assessment of systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Liu; Shervin Assassi; Sam Theodore; Christopher Smith; Alexander Schill; Manmohan Singh; Salavat Aglyamov; Chandra Mohan; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.207

3.  Effects of phase aberration on transabdominal focusing for a large aperture, lowf-number histotripsy transducer.

Authors:  Ellen Yeats; Dinank Gupta; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 4.  The potential role of using vaccine patches to induce immunity: platform and pathways to innovation and commercialization.

Authors:  Kamran Badizadegan; James L Goodson; Paul A Rota; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 5.  Mesotherapy: From Historical Notes to Scientific Evidence and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Massimo Mammucari; Enrica Maggiori; Domenico Russo; Chiara Giorgio; Gianpaolo Ronconi; Paola E Ferrara; Flora Canzona; Luciano Antonaci; Bartolomeo Violo; Renato Vellucci; Domenico Rocco Mediati; Alberto Migliore; Umberto Massafra; Barbara Bifarini; Fabio Gori; Massimo di Carlo; Stefano Brauneis; Teresa Paolucci; Piergiovanni Rocchi; Anna Cuguttu; Raffaele Di Marzo; Alessandro Bomprezzi; Stefania Santini; Manuela Giardini; Anna Rosa Catizzone; Fiammetta Troili; Dario Dorato; Alessandra Gallo; Costanza Guglielmo; Silvia Natoli
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-05-01

6.  Cellular and animal models of skin alterations in the autism-related ADNP syndrome.

Authors:  Pilar Mollinedo; Oxana Kapitansky; Domingo Gonzalez-Lamuño; Adi Zaslavsky; Pedro Real; Illana Gozes; Alberto Gandarillas; Jose L Fernandez-Luna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Vaccination into the Dermal Compartment: Techniques, Challenges, and Prospects.

Authors:  Johanna Hettinga; Robert Carlisle
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

8.  The Role of Clinical Examination in Midface Volume Correction Using Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Should Patients Be Stratified by Skin Thickness?

Authors:  Andreas Nikolis; Kaitlyn M Enright; Desislava Lazarova; John Sampalis
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2020-02-06

9.  Ultrasound image of healthy skin in newborns in the first 24 hours of life.

Authors:  Paulina Przybysz; Teresa Jackowska; Maria Wilińska; Sylwia Malinowska; Joanna Wójtowicz; Robert Krzysztof Mlosek
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2020-12-18

10.  In Vivo Study on Site of Action of Sinapine Thiocyanate following Acupoint Herbal Patching.

Authors:  Shan Chen; Yu-Tong Jin; Zheng-Yang Zhu; Ling-Tao Wu; Ping Yang; Ping Jin; Li-Hua Xuan
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.