| Literature DB >> 33500790 |
Paulina Przybysz1, Teresa Jackowska1, Maria Wilińska2, Sylwia Malinowska3, Joanna Wójtowicz1, Robert Krzysztof Mlosek4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound imaging is a safe, repeatable and easily available imaging procedure. Based on these qualities, it may become a useful tool for skin assessment in newborns. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of high-frequency ultrasound imaging for neonatal skin assessment. Another aim was to identify differences in ultrasound features of the skin in newborns depending on the examination site, sex, age, birth weight, and arterial blood gas results. MATERIAL ANDEntities:
Keywords: dermis; epidermis; newborn; skin ultrasound; subcutaneous tissue
Year: 2020 PMID: 33500790 PMCID: PMC7830153 DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2020.0043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ultrason ISSN: 2084-8404
Fig. 1.Automatic measurement of subcutaneous tissue thickness in the ultrasound image using Dramiński software (DermaMed)
Fig. 2.Ultrasound image of the skin in a newborn in the first 24 hours of life (thigh area), DermaMed unit with a 48 MHz probe. a – epidermis; b – dermis; c – subcutaneous tissue
Fig. 3.Relationship between epidermal thickness and body weight in all examined sites
Relationship between epidermal thickness and body weight in all examined sites
| Forearm | Abdomen | Thigh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.48 | |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Epidermal and dermal thickness [mm] in newborns in the first 24 hours of life in three examined sites – on the outer side of the forearm, on the abdomen, and on the thigh (epidermal thickness values on the forearm and thigh were normally distributed, while other values were non-normally distributed)
| Forearm | Abdomen | Thigh | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| epidermis | dermis | epidermis | dermis | epidermis | dermis | |
| 0.056 | 0.577 | 0.060 | 0.511 | 0.063 | 0.478 | |
| 0.073 | 0.676 | 0.072 | 0.641 | 0.073 | 0.617 | |
| 0.081 | 0.084 | |||||
| 0.086 | 0.769 | 0.090 | 0.786 | 0.090 | 0.781 | |
| 0.106 | 0.990 | 0.099 | 1.196 | 0.110 | 1.180 | |
| 0.734 | 0.082 | 0.732 | 0.705 | |||
| 0.078 | 0.712 | 0.079 | 0.703 | 0.080 | 0.676 | |
| 0.083 | 0.756 | 0.085 | 0.761 | 0.085 | 0.735 | |
Relationship between epidermal thickness in the first 24 hours of life and post-conceptional age
| Forearm | Abdomen | Thigh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.35 | |
| 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.013 |
Fig. 4.Relationship between dermal thickness and body weight on the thigh
Differences in the echogenicity of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue between the three examined sites
| Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test | |
| forearm vs abdomen | <0.05 |
| forearm vs thigh | NS |
| abdomen vs thigh | <0.05 |
| Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test | |
| forearm vs abdomen | <0.05 |
| forearm vs thigh | NS |
| abdomen vs thigh | <0.05 |
Fig. 5.Ultrasound image (DermaMed unit with a 48 MHz probe) of subcutaneous oedema in a newborn in the first 24 hours of life. A.Forearm B.Abdomen C.Thigh