Literature DB >> 27495932

Intertrial unconditioned stimuli differentially impact trace conditioning.

Douglas A Williams1, Travis P Todd2, Chrissy M Chubala2, Elliot A Ludvig3.   

Abstract

Three experiments assessed how appetitive conditioning in rats changes over the duration of a trace conditioned stimulus (CS) when unsignaled unconditioned stimuli (USs) are introduced into the intertrial interval. In Experiment 1, a target US occurred at a fixed time either shortly before (embedded), shortly after (trace), or at the same time (delay) as the offset of a 120-s CS. During the CS, responding was most suppressed by intertrial USs in the trace group, less so in the delay group, and least in the embedded group. Unreinforced probe trials revealed a bell-shaped curve centered on the normal US arrival time during the trace interval, suggesting that temporally specific learning occurred both with and without intertrial USs. Experiments 2a and 2b confirmed that the bulk of the trace CS became inhibitory when intertrial USs were scheduled, as measured by summation and retardation tests, even though CS offset evoked a temporally precise conditioned response. Thus, an inhibitory CS may give rise to new stimuli specifically linked to its termination, which are excitatory. A modification to the microstimulus temporal difference model is offered to account for the data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned inhibition; Temporal conditioning; Temporal-difference models; Timing; Trace conditioning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27495932     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  24 in total

1.  Timing for the absence of a stimulus: the gap paradigm reversed.

Authors:  C V Buhusi; W H Meck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-07

2.  Temporal landmarks: proximity prevails.

Authors:  S Fairhurst; C R Gallistel; J Gibbon
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN THE GOLDFISH AS A FUNCTION OF THE CS-US INTERVAL.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-12

4.  A modular theory of learning and performance.

Authors:  Paulo Guilhardi; Linun Yi; Russell M Church
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

5.  Stimulus representation and the timing of reward-prediction errors in models of the dopamine system.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; Richard S Sutton; E James Kehoe
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to a CSA-CSB-US serial compound: manipulations of CSB's associative character.

Authors:  C M Gibbs; E J Kehoe; I Gormezano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-10

Review 7.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Temporal encoding as a determinant of blocking.

Authors:  R C Barnet; N J Grahame; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1993-10

9.  Magnitude and timing of conditioned responses in delay and trace classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  E James Kehoe; Elliot A Ludvig; Richard S Sutton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Timed excitatory conditioning under zero and negative contingencies.

Authors:  Douglas A Williams; Carla Lawson; Rachel Cook; Amber A Mather; Kenneth W Johns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Altered balance of excitatory and inhibitory learning in a genetically modified mouse model of glutamatergic dysfunction relevant to schizophrenia.

Authors:  David J Sanderson; Aletheia Lee; Rolf Sprengel; Peter H Seeburg; Paul J Harrison; David M Bannerman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.478

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.