Literature DB >> 19824776

Magnitude and timing of conditioned responses in delay and trace classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

E James Kehoe1, Elliot A Ludvig, Richard S Sutton.   

Abstract

The present experiment characterized conditioned nictitating membrane (NM) movements as a function of CS duration, using the full range of discernible movements (>.06 mm) rather than movements exceeding a conventional criterion (>.50 mm). The CS-US interval was fixed at 500 ms, while across groups, the duration of the CS was 50 ms (trace), 550 ms (delay), or 1050 ms (extended delay). The delay group showed the highest level of acquisition. When tested with the different CS durations, the delay and extended delay groups showed large reductions in their responses when their CS was shortened to 50 ms, but the trace group maintained its response at all durations. Timing of the conditioned movements appeared similar across all manipulations. The results suggest that the CS has both a fine timing function tied to CS onset and a general predictive function tied to CS duration, both of which may be mediated by cerebellar pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19824776     DOI: 10.1037/a0017112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  8 in total

1.  Hippocampus, time, and memory--a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Warren H Meck; Russell M Church; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Towards a unified model of pavlovian conditioning: short review of trace conditioning models.

Authors:  V I Kryukov
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Mind the gap: olfactory trace conditioning in honeybees.

Authors:  Paul Szyszka; Christiane Demmler; Mariann Oemisch; Ludwig Sommer; Stephanie Biergans; Benjamin Birnbach; Ana F Silbering; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Evaluating the TD model of classical conditioning.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; Richard S Sutton; E James Kehoe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Intertrial unconditioned stimuli differentially impact trace conditioning.

Authors:  Douglas A Williams; Travis P Todd; Chrissy M Chubala; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 6.  Bridging the interval: theory and neurobiology of trace conditioning.

Authors:  Jonathan D Raybuck; K Matthew Lattal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Cerebellar associative sensory learning defects in five mouse autism models.

Authors:  Alexander D Kloth; Aleksandra Badura; Amy Li; Adriana Cherskov; Sara G Connolly; Andrea Giovannucci; M Ali Bangash; Giorgio Grasselli; Olga Peñagarikano; Claire Piochon; Peter T Tsai; Daniel H Geschwind; Christian Hansel; Mustafa Sahin; Toru Takumi; Paul F Worley; Samuel S-H Wang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Trace conditioning in insects-keep the trace!

Authors:  Kristina V Dylla; Dana S Galili; Paul Szyszka; Alja Lüdke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.