Literature DB >> 27495809

Does Surgeon Experience Impact the Risk of Complications After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Eduardo N Novais1, Patrick M Carry2, Lauryn A Kestel2, Brian Ketterman2, Christopher M Brusalis3, Wudbhav N Sankar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a technically challenging procedure with potential risk for major complications and a previously reported steep learning curve. However, the impact of contemporary hip preservation fellowships on the learning curve of PAO has not been established. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What was the frequency of major complications during the PAO learning curve of two surgeons who recently graduated from hip preservation fellowships? (2) Is increasing level of experience associated with the risk of a complication and with operative time, a possible surrogate measure of surgical performance?
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 81 PAOs performed by one of two surgeons who recently graduated from a hip preservation fellowship during their first 4 years of practice in two institutions. One of the surgeons participated as a fellow in 78 PAOs with an increasing level of responsibility during the course of 1 full year. The other surgeon performed 41 PAOs as a fellow during 6 months, also with an increasing level of responsibility during that time. There were 68 (84%) female and 13 (16%) male patients (mean age, 18 years; range, 10-36 years). The frequency of complications was recorded early and at 1 year after surgery and graded according to a validated classification system describing five grades of complications. Complications that required surgical intervention (Grade III) and life-threatening complications (Grade IV) were considered major complications. Persistent pain after surgery, although considered a failure of PAO, was not considered a surgical complication as a result of the multifactorial etiology of pain after hip-preserving surgery. However, early reoperation and revision surgery were counted as complications. To evaluate the association between increasing level of experience and the occurrence of complications, we divided each surgeon's experience into his first 20 procedures (initial interval) and his second 20 (experienced interval) to test whether the incidence of complications or operative time was different between the two intervals. Because the association between experience and the likelihood of a complication was estimated to be consistent between the two surgeons, the analysis was performed with data pooled from the two surgeons. To test whether there was a difference in the likelihood of a complication in the initial and the experienced intervals, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed and the adjusted risk of a complication between the two intervals was calculated. Linear regression analyses were used to test the association between surgeon level of experience and operative time.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of major (Grade III or Grade IV) complications was 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-14%). These included deep infection (3% [three of 81]), intraoperative posterior column fracture (1% [one of 81]), and pulmonary embolism (1% [one of 81]). With the numbers available, the risk of a complication did not decrease with increasing surgeon experience. After controlling for body mass index and surgeon, the frequency of a complication did not decrease in the experienced interval relative to the initial interval (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.25-2.4; p = 0.6623). The adjusted risk difference between the experienced interval relative and the initial interval was 6% (95% CI, -11% to 23%). When experience was modeled as a continuous variable (number of PAOs performed), increasing experience was not associated with a lower likelihood of a complication (odds ratio per one PAO increase in experience, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04; p = 0.5478). However, after adjusting for body mass index and surgeon, increased experience was associated with a reduction in operative time (slope [change in log operative time per one procedure increase in experience], -0.005; 95% CI, -0.009 to -0.0005; p = 0.0292). For every one additional PAO increase in experience, there was a 0.45% decrease in operative time (95% CI, 0.05%-0.86% decrease].
CONCLUSIONS: With a case exposure greater than 40 PAOs and progressive surgical responsibility during contemporary structured training, two young surgeons were able to perform PAO with a low risk of complications. However, even with that surgical experience before independent practice, surgical time decreased over the first 40 PAOs they performed independently. Our data may help guide orthopaedic residency and hip preservation fellowship programs in establishing training requirements and assessing competency in PAO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27495809      PMCID: PMC5339113          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5010-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Periacetabular osteotomy without abductor dissection using direct anterior exposure.

Authors:  S B Murphy; M B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson; Jerod L Hines
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Impingement adversely affects 10-year survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy for DDH.

Authors:  Christoph E Albers; Simon D Steppacher; Reinhold Ganz; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: is transection of the rectus femoris tendon essential?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Young-Jo Kim; Patrick M Carry; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does previous reconstructive surgery influence functional improvement and deformity correction after periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Gregory G Polkowski; Eduardo N Novais; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Perry L Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Acetabular Dysplasia With a Periacetabular Osteotomy: Does Obesity Increase the Risk of Complications?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Gorden D Potter; Rafael J Sierra; Young-Jo Kim; John C Clohisy; Perry L Schoenecker; Robert T Trousdale; Patrick M Carry; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  The periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum 2 year followup in more than 100 hips.

Authors:  S J Trumble; K A Mayo; J W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Early experience and results with the periacetabular osteotomy. The Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  J Crockarell; R T Trousdale; M E Cabanela; D J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy.

Authors:  R Biedermann; L Donnan; A Gabriel; R Wachter; M Krismer; H Behensky
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  17 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: Operative Fluoroscopic Correction Is Reliable and Correlates With Postoperative Radiographic Correction in Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Computer-assisted surgery prevents complications during peri-acetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Nao Shibanuma; Kazunari Ishida; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Daud Tai Shan Chou; Lucian Bogdan Solomon; Kerry Costi; Susan Pannach; Oksana Tamara Holubowycz; Donald William Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A minimally invasive periacetabular osteotomy improves the radiographic parameters and functional outcomes in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adolescents and adults: surgical technique and early results.

Authors:  Yunfeng Tang; Dong Wang; Limin Wang; Wei Xiong; Qian Fang; Wei Lin; Guanglin Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Long-term results of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy using a dual approach in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Hyun Chul Shon; Woo Sung Park; Jae-Suk Chang; Seong-Eun Byun; Dong-Wook Son; Hee Jin Park; Sang Hoon Ha; Ki Tae Park; Jai Hyung Park
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes in spine surgery: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Zi Li; Zhong Lin; Zong-Ze Li; Zeng-Yan Yang; Yang Zheng; Yong Li; Hua-Ding Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-11

8.  Letter to the Editor: Structured-mentorship Program for Periacetabular Osteotomy Resulted in Few Complications for a Low-volume Pelvic Surgeon.

Authors:  Dominick A Tuason; Harold G Moore; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  What Proportion of Patients Undergoing Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy Experience Nonunion, and What Factors are Associated with Nonunion?

Authors:  Courtney M Selberg; Ariel D Davila-Parrilla; Kathryn A Williams; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  The poor quality and reliability of information on periacetabular osteotomy on the internet in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Takegami; Taisuke Seki; Takafumi Amano; Yoshitoshi Higuchi; Daigo Komatsu; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.131

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.