Literature DB >> 27495758

Survival Benefit in Older Patients Associated With Earlier Transplant With High KDPI Kidneys.

Colleen L Jay1, Kenneth Washburn, Patrick G Dean, Ryan A Helmick, Jacqueline A Pugh, Mark D Stegall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given high dialysis mortality rates for patients older than 60 years, accepting a kidney with a high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) score could enable earlier and potentially preemptive transplantation (preKT). However, evidence regarding the risks of high KDPI allografts in older patients is limited. Our objective was to determine the relative benefit for older patients of KDPI greater than 85% transplant either preemptively or not compared with remaining on the waitlist.
METHODS: United Network of Organ Sharing data from 2003 to 2012 for adult deceased donor kidney transplant candidates was analyzed to evaluate patient survival in patients older than 60 years for preKT and non-preKT KDPI greater than 85% transplants compared with candidates remaining on the waitlist including patients who received KDPI 0% to 85% transplants according to multivariate Cox regression models.
RESULTS: In the first year posttransplant for KDPI greater than 85% of transplants in recipients older than 60 years, preKT had a reduced mortality hazard (hazards ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.41-0.90) and non-preKT an increased mortality hazard (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.27) compared with the waitlist including KDPI 0% to 85% transplant recipients. At 1 to 2 years and after 2 years, both KDPI greater than 85% groups had significant reductions in mortality (1-2 years: preKT HR, 0.38; 95% CI, [0.23-0.60] and non-preKT HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.61; and 2+ years: preKT HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.66 and non-preKT HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: PreKT and non-preKT KDPI greater than 85% transplant was associated with lower mortality hazard after the first year compared with the waitlist including KDPI 0% to 85% transplants in patients older than 60 years. Further consideration should be given to increased utilization of high KDPI grafts in older patients with the goal of avoiding or limiting time on dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27495758      PMCID: PMC5292097          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  22 in total

1.  The kidney allocation system.

Authors:  John J Friedewald; Ciara J Samana; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Darren Stewart; Wida Cherikh; Richard N Formica
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Balancing accountable care with risk aversion: transplantation as a model.

Authors:  D A Axelrod
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Listing for expanded criteria donor kidneys in older adults and those with predicted benefit.

Authors:  M E Grams; K L Womer; R M Ugarte; N M Desai; R A Montgomery; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Survival benefit of primary deceased donor transplantation with high-KDPI kidneys.

Authors:  A B Massie; X Luo; E K H Chow; J L Alejo; N M Desai; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Preemptive kidney transplantation: the advantage and the advantaged.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Jon J Snyder; Arthur J Matas; Mary D Ellison; John S Gill; Annamaria T Kausz
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys.

Authors:  J M Garonzik-Wang; N T James; K C Weatherspoon; N A Deshpande; J A Berger; E C Hall; R A Montgomery; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Differential outcomes of expanded-criteria donor renal allografts according to recipient age.

Authors:  Joshua D Mezrich; John D Pirsch; Luis A Fernandez; David P Foley; Janet M Bellingham; Jon S Odorico; Glen E Leverson; Alejandro Munoz-Del-Rio; Hans W Sollinger; Dixon B Kaufman; Anthony M D'Alessandro
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Half of kidney transplant candidates who are older than 60 years now placed on the waiting list will die before receiving a deceased-donor transplant.

Authors:  Jesse Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Ashwini R Sehgal; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Patient selection and volume in the era surrounding implementation of Medicare conditions of participation for transplant programs.

Authors:  Sarah L White; Dawn M Zinsser; Matthew Paul; Gregory N Levine; Tempie Shearon; Valarie B Ashby; John C Magee; Yi Li; Alan B Leichtman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study.

Authors:  W E Harmon; D Stablein; S R Alexander; A Tejani
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  31 in total

1.  Early Experience with the New Kidney Allocation System: A Perspective from UNOS.

Authors:  Darren E Stewart; David K Klassen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Pre-implantation kidney biopsy: value of the expertise in determining histological score and comparison with the whole organ on a series of discarded kidneys.

Authors:  Ilaria Girolami; Giovanni Gambaro; Claudio Ghimenton; Serena Beccari; Anna Caliò; Matteo Brunelli; Luca Novelli; Ugo Boggi; Daniela Campani; Gianluigi Zaza; Luigino Boschiero; José Ignacio López; Guido Martignoni; Antonia D'Errico; Dorry Segev; Desley Neil; Albino Eccher
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Functional status-based risk-benefit analyses of high-KDPI kidney transplant versus dialysis.

Authors:  Kevin Bui; Vikram Kilambi; Sanjay Mehrotra
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.782

4.  Evaluation of Accepting Kidneys of Varying Quality for Transplantation or Expedited Placement With Decision Trees.

Authors:  Vikram Kilambi; Kevin Bui; Gordon B Hazen; John J Friedewald; Daniela P Ladner; Bruce Kaplan; Sanjay Mehrotra
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Characteristics and Performance of Unilateral Kidney Transplants from Deceased Donors.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Mariana C Chiles; Samnang Lee; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer; Bekir Tanriover; Lloyd E Ratner; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Reevaluation of the Kidney Donor Risk Index.

Authors:  Yingchao Zhong; Douglas E Schaubel; John D Kalbfleisch; Valarie B Ashby; Panduranga S Rao; Randall S Sung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Measuring transplant center performance: The goals are not controversial but the methods and consequences can be.

Authors:  Colleen Jay; Jesse D Schold
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-02-08

8.  Impact of Extending Eligibility for Reinstatement of Waiting Time After Early Allograft Failure: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  S Ali Husain; Kristen L King; Joel T Adler; Sumit Mohan; Rimma Perotte
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  An opt-out model for kidney transplant referral: The time has come.

Authors:  Anne M Huml; John R Sedor; Emilio Poggio; Rachel E Patzer; Jesse D Schold
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Immunosuppression Considerations for Older Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Krista L Lentine; Jane C Tan; Matthew Kaufmann; Yasar Caliskan; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Ngan N Lam; Mark Schnitzler; David A Axelrod
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2021-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.