Literature DB >> 21992578

The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys.

J M Garonzik-Wang1, N T James, K C Weatherspoon, N A Deshpande, J A Berger, E C Hall, R A Montgomery, D L Segev.   

Abstract

Despite the fact that suboptimal kidneys have worse outcomes, differences in waiting times and wait-list mortality have led to variations in the use of these kidneys. It is unknown whether aggressive center-level use of one type of suboptimal graft clusters with aggressive use of other types of suboptimal grafts, and what center characteristics are associated with an overall aggressive phenotype. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from 2005 to 2009 for adult kidney transplant recipients was aggregated to the center level. An aggressiveness score was assigned to each center based on usage of suboptimal grafts. Deceased-donor transplant volume correlated with aggressiveness in lower volume, but not higher volume centers. Aggressive centers were mostly found in regions 2 and 9. Aggressiveness was associated with wait-list size (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.20-2.34, p = 0.002), organ shortage (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.57-3.37, p < 0.001) and waiting times (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20-2.57, p = 0.004). No centers in single-center OPOs were classified as aggressive. In cluster analysis, the most aggressive centers were aggressive in all metrics and vice versa; however, centers with intermediate aggressiveness had phenotypic patterns in their usage of suboptimal kidneys. In conclusion, wait-list size, waiting times, geographic region and OPO competition seem to be driving factors in center-level aggressiveness.
© 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21992578     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03789.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  22 in total

Review 1.  New Solutions to Reduce Discard of Kidneys Donated for Transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Meera N Harhay; Peter L Abt; Matthew H Levine; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Influence of kidney offer acceptance behavior on metrics of allocation efficiency.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Survival Benefit in Older Patients Associated With Earlier Transplant With High KDPI Kidneys.

Authors:  Colleen L Jay; Kenneth Washburn; Patrick G Dean; Ryan A Helmick; Jacqueline A Pugh; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Patients prioritize waitlist over posttransplant outcomes when evaluating kidney transplant centers.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Corey Brennan; Ariane Michelson; Demetra Tsapepas; Rachel E Patzer; Jesse D Schold; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Association Between Organ Procurement Organization Social Network Centrality and Kidney Discard and Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Neel M Butala; Marissa D King; William Reitsma; Richard N Formica; Peter L Abt; Peter P Reese; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Geographic disparity in kidney transplantation under KAS.

Authors:  Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Xun Luo; Jessica M Ruck; Eric K H Chow; Mary G Bowring; Sunjae Bae; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients.

Authors:  Kristen L King; S Ali Husain; Jesse D Schold; Rachel E Patzer; Peter P Reese; Zhezhen Jin; Lloyd E Ratner; David J Cohen; Stephen O Pastan; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  National Variation in Increased Infectious Risk Kidney Offer Acceptance.

Authors:  Courtenay M Holscher; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Sommer E Gentry; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Associations of deceased donor kidney injury with kidney discard and function after transplantation.

Authors:  I E Hall; B Schröppel; M D Doshi; J Ficek; F L Weng; R D Hasz; H Thiessen-Philbrook; P P Reese; C R Parikh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The prognostic value of kidney transplant center report cards.

Authors:  J D Schold; L D Buccini; E L G Heaphy; D A Goldfarb; A R Sehgal; J Fung; E D Poggio; M W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.