Literature DB >> 24838079

Patient selection and volume in the era surrounding implementation of Medicare conditions of participation for transplant programs.

Sarah L White1, Dawn M Zinsser, Matthew Paul, Gregory N Levine, Tempie Shearon, Valarie B Ashby, John C Magee, Yi Li, Alan B Leichtman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence of practice changes affecting kidney transplant program volumes, and donor, recipient and candidate selection in the era surrounding the introduction of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) conditions of participation (CoPs) for organ transplant programs. DATA: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients; CMS ESRD and Medicare claims databases.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of national registry data.
METHODS: A Cox proportional hazards model of 1-year graft survival was used to derive risks associated with deceased-donor kidney transplants performed from 2001 to 2010.
FINDINGS: Among programs with ongoing noncompliance with the CoPs, kidney transplant volumes declined by 38 percent (n = 766) from 2006 to 2011, including a 55 percent drop in expanded criteria donor transplants. Volume increased by 6 percent (n = 638) among programs remaining in compliance. Aggregate risk of 1-year graft failure increased over time due to increasing recipient age and obesity, and longer ESRD duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Although trends in aggregate risk of 1-year kidney graft loss do not indicate that the introduction of the CoPs has systematically reduced opportunities for marginal candidates or that there has been a systematic shift away from utilization of higher risk deceased donor kidneys, total volume and expanded criteria donor utilization decreased overall among programs with ongoing noncompliance. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Medicare; kidney transplantation; quality improvement; regulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838079      PMCID: PMC4369212          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  20 in total

1.  DonorNet and the potential effects on organ utilization.

Authors:  D A Gerber; C J Arrington; S E Taranto; T Baker; R S Sung
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  SRTR program-specific reports on outcomes: a guide for the new reader.

Authors:  D M Dickinson; C J Arrington; G Fant; G N Levine; D E Schaubel; T L Pruett; M S Roberts; R A Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  American Society of Transplant Surgeons transplant center outcomes requirements--a threat to innovation.

Authors:  M M Abecassis; R Burke; G B Klintmalm; A J Matas; R M Merion; D Millman; K Olthoff; J P Roberts
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Improving organ transplantation in the United States--a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  T E Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors.

Authors:  Friedrich K Port; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Robert A Metzger; Dawn M Dykstra; Brenda W Gillespie; Eric W Young; Francis L Delmonico; James J Wynn; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Regulatory oversight in transplantation: are the patients really better off?

Authors:  Thomas E Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  The effects of DonorNet 2007 on kidney distribution equity and efficiency.

Authors:  A B Massie; S L Zeger; R A Montgomery; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006: the HRSA Breakthrough Collaboratives and the 58 DSA Challenge.

Authors:  A B Leichtman; D Cohen; D Keith; K O'Connor; M Goldstein; V McBride; C J Gould; L L Christensen; V B Ashby
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  The association of candidate mortality rates with kidney transplant outcomes and center performance evaluations.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Richard J Howard; Ian R Jamieson; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Effect of comorbidity adjustment on CMS criteria for kidney transplant center performance.

Authors:  E D Weinhandl; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  Considering potential benefits and consequences of hospital report cards: what are the next steps?

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Building an Ideal Quality Metric for ESRD Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Laura D Buccini; Michael P Phelan; Colleen L Jay; David A Goldfarb; Emilio D Poggio; John R Sedor
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Survival Benefit in Older Patients Associated With Earlier Transplant With High KDPI Kidneys.

Authors:  Colleen L Jay; Kenneth Washburn; Patrick G Dean; Ryan A Helmick; Jacqueline A Pugh; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Transplant community perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of alternative quality metrics for regulation.

Authors:  Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Sheng Zhou; Alvin G Thomas; Dorry L Segev; Lauren H Nicholas
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Alvin G Thomas; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Macey L Henderson; Sarah S Stith; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Measuring transplant center performance: The goals are not controversial but the methods and consequences can be.

Authors:  Colleen Jay; Jesse D Schold
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-02-08

7.  Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Allan B Massie; Rebecca Craig-Schapiro; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Failure to Advance Access to Kidney Transplantation over Two Decades in the United States.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Sumit Mohan; Anne Huml; Laura D Buccini; John R Sedor; Joshua J Augustine; Emilio D Poggio
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Quality-based ratings in Medicare and trends in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.734

10.  Patient selection in the presence of regulatory oversight based on healthcare report cards of providers: the case of organ transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé; Kurt E Schnier
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2021-01-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.