Sandrah P Eckel1, Myles Cockburn1, Yu-Hsiang Shu2, Huiyu Deng1, Frederick W Lurmann3, Lihua Liu1, Frank D Gilliland1. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA. 3. Sonoma Technology Inc., Petaluma, California, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Exposure to ambient air pollutants has been associated with increased lung cancer incidence and mortality, but due to the high case fatality rate, little is known about the impacts of air pollution exposures on survival after diagnosis. This study aimed to determine whether ambient air pollutant exposures are associated with the survival of patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Participants were 352 053 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer during 1988-2009 in California, ascertained by the California Cancer Registry. Average residential ambient air pollutant concentrations were estimated for each participant's follow-up period. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs relating air pollutant exposures to all-cause mortality overall and stratified by stage (localised only, regional and distant site) and histology (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, small cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma and others) at diagnosis, adjusting for potential individual and area-level confounders. RESULTS: Adjusting for histology and other potential confounders, the HRs associated with 1 SD increases in NO2, O3, PM10, PM2.5 for patients with localised stage at diagnosis were 1.30 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.32), 1.04 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.05), 1.26 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.28) and 1.38 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.41), respectively. Adjusted HRs were smaller in later stages and varied by histological type within stage (p<0.01, except O3). The largest associations were for patients with early-stage non-small cell cancers, particularly adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: These epidemiological findings support the hypothesis that air pollution exposures after lung cancer diagnosis shorten survival. Future studies should evaluate the impacts of exposure reduction. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
RATIONALE: Exposure to ambient air pollutants has been associated with increased lung cancer incidence and mortality, but due to the high case fatality rate, little is known about the impacts of air pollution exposures on survival after diagnosis. This study aimed to determine whether ambient air pollutant exposures are associated with the survival of patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Participants were 352 053 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer during 1988-2009 in California, ascertained by the California Cancer Registry. Average residential ambient air pollutant concentrations were estimated for each participant's follow-up period. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs relating air pollutant exposures to all-cause mortality overall and stratified by stage (localised only, regional and distant site) and histology (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, small cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma and others) at diagnosis, adjusting for potential individual and area-level confounders. RESULTS: Adjusting for histology and other potential confounders, the HRs associated with 1 SD increases in NO2, O3, PM10, PM2.5 for patients with localised stage at diagnosis were 1.30 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.32), 1.04 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.05), 1.26 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.28) and 1.38 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.41), respectively. Adjusted HRs were smaller in later stages and varied by histological type within stage (p<0.01, except O3). The largest associations were for patients with early-stage non-small cell cancers, particularly adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: These epidemiological findings support the hypothesis that air pollution exposures after lung cancer diagnosis shorten survival. Future studies should evaluate the impacts of exposure reduction. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Lynn T Tanoue; Nichole T Tanner; Michael K Gould; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: S L Zeger; D Thomas; F Dominici; J M Samet; J Schwartz; D Dockery; A Cohen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Xiaohui Xu; Sandie Ha; Haidong Kan; Hui Hu; Barbara A Curbow; Claudia T K Lissaker Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ghassan B Hamra; Francine Laden; Aaron J Cohen; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Michael Brauer; Dana Loomis Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ghassan B Hamra; Neela Guha; Aaron Cohen; Francine Laden; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Jonathan M Samet; Paolo Vineis; Francesco Forastiere; Paulo Saldiva; Takashi Yorifuji; Dana Loomis Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Heejoo Jo; Sandrah P Eckel; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Myles Cockburn; Mayra P Martinez; Ting Chow; Fred Lurmann; William E Funk; Rob McConnell; Anny H Xiang Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Heejoo Jo; Sandrah P Eckel; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Myles Cockburn; Mayra P Martinez; Ting Chow; Frederick W Lurmann; William E Funk; Anny H Xiang; Rob McConnell Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Farnaz Fouladi; Maximilian J Bailey; William B Patterson; Michael Sioda; Ivory C Blakley; Anthony A Fodor; Roshonda B Jones; Zhanghua Chen; Jeniffer S Kim; Frederick Lurmann; Cameron Martino; Rob Knight; Frank D Gilliland; Tanya L Alderete Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Tanya L Alderete; Rima Habre; Claudia M Toledo-Corral; Kiros Berhane; Zhanghua Chen; Frederick W Lurmann; Marc J Weigensberg; Michael I Goran; Frank D Gilliland Journal: Diabetes Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Verónica M Vieira; Carolina Villanueva; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Robert E Bristow Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Jason Y Y Wong; Helene G Margolis; Mitchell Machiela; Weiyin Zhou; Michelle C Odden; Bruce M Psaty; John Robbins; Rena R Jones; Jerome I Rotter; Stephen J Chanock; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan; Jennifer S Lee Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Michelle C Turner; Zorana J Andersen; Andrea Baccarelli; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; C Arden Pope; Diddier Prada; Jonathan Samet; George Thurston; Aaron Cohen Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 508.702