| Literature DB >> 27490805 |
Kristina Stuopelyte1, Kristina Daniunaite1, Arnas Bakavicius2, Juozas R Lazutka1, Feliksas Jankevicius2,3, Sonata Jarmalaite1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this paper, the utility of urine-circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as the potential biomarker of prostate cancer (PCa), the second most prevalent male cancer worldwide, was evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27490805 PMCID: PMC5023772 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Workflow of miRNA expression study in tissue and urine of PCa patients and controls.
Clinical-pathological characteristics of patients with prostate cancer (PCa), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and asymptomatic controls (ASCs)
| Mean±s.e.m., years | 61.6±0.9 | 62.0±0.6 | 61.4±0.6 | 61.7±0.9 | 74.2±1.4 | 63.3±1.2 |
| Range, years | 48–73 | 53–70 | 42–74 | 41–73 | 59–83 | 30–81 |
| 6; | 20 (35.7) | 75 (52.4) | 15 (20.8) | |||
| ⩾7; | 36 (64.3) | — | 68 (47.6) | 56 (77.8) | — | — |
| Unknown; | — | — | 1 (1.4) | |||
| ⩽(3+4); | 49 (87.5) | 118 (82.5) | 53 (73.6) | |||
| ⩾(4+3); | 7 (12.5) | — | 10 (7.0) | 18 (25.0) | — | — |
| Unknown; | — | 15 (10.5) | 1 (1.4) | |||
| ⩽2; | 38 (67.9) | 112 (78.3) | 55 (76.4) | |||
| 3; | 18 (32.1) | — | 31 (21.7) | 16 (22.2) | — | — |
| Unknown; | — | — | 1 (1.4) | |||
| Yes; | 18 (32.1) | 26 (18.2) | 9 (12.5) | |||
| No; | 37 (66.1) | — | 105 (73.4) | 45 (62.5) | — | — |
| Unknown; | 1 (1.8) | 12 (8.4) | 18 (25.0) | |||
| Mean±s.e.m., ng ml−1 | 10.8±4.5 | 6.6±1.8 | 9.7±1.0 | 8.5±0.9 | 7.8±1.3 | |
| Range, ng ml−1 | 2.8–84.2 | 2.6–17.0 | 0.1–84.2 | 2.3–38.0 | 0.8–28.1 | — |
| Unknown; | 2 (3.6) | — | 3 (2.1) | — | 2 (8.7) | |
| Yes; | 37 (66.1) | 56 (39.2) | 16 (22.2) | |||
| No; | 19 (33.9) | — | 41 (28.7) | 10 (13.9) | — | — |
| Unknown; | — | 46 (32.2) | 46 (63.9) | |||
| Positive; | 22 (39.3) | |||||
| Negative; | 34 (60.7) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Unknown; | — | |||||
Abbreviations: BCR=biochemical recurrence; NPT=non-cancerous prostate tissue; PSA=prostate-specific antigen.
Figure 2Differentially expressed miRNAs in prostate cancer (PCa) MiRNA expression was analysed applying global normalisation method (white) or selected ECs (black) in the (A) screening and (B) validation steps. (C) The heat map illustrates the expression of the 11 most significantly deregulated miRNAs in the screening step. A full colour version of this figure is available online.
Figure 3MiRNA levels in prostate tissues and urine specimens. Significant (P-value <0.05) associations between (A) miRNAs assayed on human microRNA custom-design cards and characteristics of PCa and miRNA levels in urine from PCa cases and controls: (B) PCa1 cohort vs BPH, (C) PCa2 cohort vs ASCs, and (D) all PCa cases vs combined controls. Column bars and lines within boxes indicate the median values of log2-normalised data, whiskers – minimum to maximum, *P<0.05, and **P<0.001. Abbreviations: T-E+/−=TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene-positive/-negative tumours; G=Gleason score; pT=pathological stage.
Figure 4ROC curve analysis of PCa biomarkers.Urinary miR-148a, miR-375, and combination of them in (A–C) cohort PCa1 and (D–F) in cohort PCa2.
Figure 5ROC curve analysis of PCa biomarkers and PSA. (A) Serum PSA and (B) combination of urinary miRNAs with PSA in (C) all PSA range and (D) in PSA grey zone (4–10 ng ml−1) only. Analyses were carried out in the PCa1 cohort only.