Literature DB >> 27490160

From the Patient Perspective, Consent Forms Fall Short of Providing Information to Guide Decision Making.

Christine J Manta1, Jacqueline Ortiz2, Benjamin W Moulton3, Seema S Sonnad1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gather qualitative feedback on patient perceptions of informed consent forms and elicit recommendations to improve readability and utility for enhanced patient safety and engagement in shared decision making.
METHODS: Sixty interviews in personal interviews were conducted consisting of a literacy and numeracy assessment, a comprehension quiz to assess retention of key information, and open-ended questions to determine reactions, clarity of information, and suggestions for improvement.
RESULTS: Although 68% of the participants had education beyond high school, many still missed comprehension questions and found the forms difficult to read. Recurrent suggestions included specific formatting changes to enhance readability, a need for additional sources of information, mixed attitudes toward inclusion of risk information, and the recognized importance of physician-patient conversations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence from the patient perspective that consent forms are too complex and fail to achieve comprehension. Future studies should be conducted using patients' suggestions for form redesign and inclusion of supplemental educational tools to optimize communication and safety to achieve more informed health care decision making.
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 27490160      PMCID: PMC5290300          DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.243


  25 in total

1.  Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction.

Authors:  M M Bottrell; H Alpert; R L Fischbach; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Cherry-Ann Waldron; Trudy van der Weijden; Sabine Ludt; John Gallacher; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-05-14

Review 3.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.

Authors:  Benjamin Moulton; Jaime S King
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Y Godwin
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2000-03

6.  Improving patient-provider communication for patients having surgery: patient perceptions of a revised health literacy-based consent process.

Authors:  Michael J Miller; Mary Ann Abrams; Barb Earles; Kirk Phillips; Erin M McCleeary
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Reconceptualizing the informed consent process at eight innovative hospitals.

Authors:  Jennifer Matiasek; Matthew K Wynia
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-03

8.  Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Dylan M Smith; Peter A Ubel; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel; Aleksandra Jankovic; Holly A Derry; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Converting the informed consent from a perfunctory process to an evidence-based foundation for patient decision making.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; Carole Decker; Homaa Ahmad; Olawale Olabiyi; Surya Mundluru; Kimberly J Reid; Gabriel E Soto; Sarah Gansert; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2008-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  The Appropriateness of Language Found in Research Consent Form Templates: A Computational Linguistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Villafranca; Stephanie Kereliuk; Colin Hamlin; Andrea Johnson; Eric Jacobsohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Reaffirming and Clarifying the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Policy Statement on the Critical Role of Phase I Trials in Cancer Research and Treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna S Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Improving readability of informed consents for research at an academic medical institution.

Authors:  Kristie B Hadden; Latrina Y Prince; Tina D Moore; Laura P James; Jennifer R Holland; Christopher R Trudeau
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-12

4.  Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Emma C Hitchcock; Causes Study; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 5.  Utilizing the "teach-back" method to improve surgical informed consent and shared decision-making: a review.

Authors:  Kevin D Seely; Jordan A Higgs; Andrew Nigh
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2022-03-05

6.  Optimised patient information materials and recruitment to a study of behavioural activation in older adults: an embedded study within a trial.

Authors:  Peter Knapp; Simon Gilbody; Janet Holt; Ada Keding; Natasha Mitchell; David K Raynor; Jonathan Silcock; David Torgerson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-05-21

Review 7.  Rebooting consent in the digital age: a governance framework for health data exchange.

Authors:  Nivedita Saksena; Rahul Matthan; Anant Bhan; Satchit Balsari
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.