Literature DB >> 27485482

Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Joaquín Cubiella1, Fernando Carballo2, Isabel Portillo3, José Cruzado Quevedo4, Dolores Salas5, Gemma Binefa6, Núria Milà6, Cristina Hernández7, Montse Andreu8, Álvaro Terán9, Eunate Arana-Arri10, Akiko Ono2, María José Valverde4, Luis Bujanda11, Vicent Hernández12, Juan Diego Morillas13, Rodrigo Jover14, Antoni Castells15.   

Abstract

Background and study aims: The European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have established high-risk (≥ 5 adenomas or an adenoma ≥ 20 mm) and intermediate-risk (3 - 4 adenomas or at least one adenoma 10 - 19 mm in size, or villous histology, or high grade dysplasia) groups with different endoscopic surveillance intervals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in the incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma or CRC) between the two risk groups. Patients and methods: This retrospective group study included patients meeting high- or intermediate-risk criteria for adenomas detected in CRC screening programs and the COLONPREV study before European guidelines were adopted in Spain (June 2011) with a 3-year surveillance recommendation according to Spanish guidelines. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients undergoing surveillance. The secondary outcome measure was the CRC incidence. We used an adjusted proportional hazards regression model to control confounding variables.
Results: The study included 5401 patients (3379 intermediate risk, 2022 high risk). Endoscopic surveillance was performed in 65.5 % of the patients (2.8 ± 1 years). The incidence of advanced neoplasia in the high- and intermediate-risk groups was 16.0 % (59.0 cases/1000 patient-years) and 12.3 % (41.2 cases/1000 patient-years), respectively. The CRC incidence was 0.5 % (1.4 cases/1000 patient-years) and 0.4 % (1 case/1000 patient-years), respectively. The advanced neoplasia and CRC attributable risk to the high risk group was of 3.7 % and 0.1 %, respectively. In the proportional hazards analysis, the risk of advanced neoplasia was greater in the high-risk group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 1.8), with no significant differences in the CRC incidence (HR 1.6, 95 %CI 0.6 - 3.8). Conclusions: Patients meeting high-risk criteria have a higher incidence of advanced neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance. No differences were found in the CRC incidence at a 3-year surveillance recommendation. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485482     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  5 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors of advanced neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection of colonic laterally spreading lesions.

Authors:  Amol Agarwal; Sidyarth Garimall; Caitlin Colling; Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; Gregory G Ginsberg; Vinay Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG).

Authors:  Kevin J Monahan; Nicola Bradshaw; Sunil Dolwani; Bianca Desouza; Malcolm G Dunlop; James E East; Mohammad Ilyas; Asha Kaur; Fiona Lalloo; Andrew Latchford; Matthew D Rutter; Ian Tomlinson; Huw J W Thomas; James Hill
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

4.  Impact of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020 guidelines on the number of scheduled post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopies: Meeting presentations: Partial results of this research were published in abstract form at ESGE Days 2020.

Authors:  Marco Bustamante-Balén; Maria García-Campos; Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga; Noelia Alonso-Lázaro; Cristina Sanchez-Montes; Lidia Argüello-Viudez; Vicente Pons-Beltrán
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14

5.  Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Emma C Robbins; Kevin Pack; Iain Stenson; Matthew D Rutter; Andrew M Veitch; Brian P Saunders; Stephen W Duffy; Kate Wooldrage
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 9.776

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.