Literature DB >> 29744577

Incidence and risk factors of advanced neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection of colonic laterally spreading lesions.

Amol Agarwal1, Sidyarth Garimall2, Caitlin Colling3, Nuzhat A Ahmad4, Michael L Kochman4, Gregory G Ginsberg4, Vinay Chandrasekhara5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate advanced neoplasia (AN) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colonic laterally spreading lesions (LSLs).
METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent injection-assisted EMR of colonic LSLs ≥ 10 mm was performed. Primary outcome was overall rate of AN at initial surveillance colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were the rates of residual AN (rAN) at the EMR site and metachronous AN (mAN), and analysis of risk factors for AN, including effect of surveillance guidance.
RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients underwent successful EMR for 388 LSLs. AN occurred in 66/374 (17.6%) patients on initial surveillance colonoscopy at median follow-up of 364.5 days. Two patients had both rAN and mAN, for a total of 68 instances of AN, including 30/374 (8.0%) cases of rAN and 38/374 (10.2%) cases of mAN. On multivariate analysis, use of piecemeal resection was associated with increased likelihood of residual AN (P = 0.003, OR 9.2, 95% CI 2.1-33.3). Twenty-nine out of thirty cases (96.7%) of rAN were successfully endoscopically managed at surveillance colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: AN occurred in 17.6% of all patients at initial surveillance colonoscopy at a median of 1 year after EMR. Roughly half of the instances of AN were metachronous lesions. Our data support a 1-year surveillance interval after EMR of LSLs ≥ 10 mm with careful inspection of the entire colon, not just the prior resection site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced neoplasia; Colon; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Laterally spreading lesion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29744577     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3075-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  33 in total

1.  Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon.

Authors:  Timothy A Woodward; Michael G Heckman; Patrick Cleveland; Silvio De Melo; Massimo Raimondo; Michael Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Pragmatic classification of superficial neoplastic colorectal lesions.

Authors:  René Lambert; Shin Ei Kudo; Michael Vieth; John I Allen; Hiroaki Fujii; Takahiro Fujii; Hiroshi Kashida; Takahisa Matsuda; Masaki Mori; Hiroshi Saito; Tadakazu Shimoda; Shinji Tanaka; Hidenobu Watanabe; Joseph J Sung; Andrew D Feld; John M Inadomi; Michael J O'Brien; David A Lieberman; David F Ransohoff; Roy M Soetikno; Ann Zauber; Claudio Rolim Teixeira; Jean Francois Rey; Edgar Jaramillo; Carlos A Rubio; Andre Van Gossum; Michael Jung; Jeremy R Jass; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection: not your father's polypectomy anymore.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Fang Xu; Jill S Barnholtz Sloan; Mark D Schluchter; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Proportion of flat- and depressed-type and laterally spreading tumor among advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Eisuke Kaku; Yasushi Oda; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hideyo Goto; Tomofumi Tanaka; Kiwamu Hasuda; Makoto Yasunaga; Kiyoharu Ito; Kouichi Sakurai; Takahiro Fujimori; Masahiro Hattori; Yutaka Sasaki
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner; Carlos Guarner-Argente; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Takahisa Matsuda; Shusei Fukunaga; Taku Sakamoto; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Hisatomo Ikehara; Kuang-I Fu; Takao Itoi; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A standardized imaging protocol is accurate in detecting recurrence after EMR.

Authors:  Lobke Desomer; Nicholas Tutticci; David J Tate; Stephen J Williams; Duncan McLeod; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  High yield of synchronous lesions in referred patients with large lateral spreading colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Benjamin L Bick; Prasanna L Ponugoti; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Incidence and predictors of "late" recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas.

Authors:  Mouen Khashab; Emely Eid; Michael Rusche; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  The First Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer in the North of Iran.

Authors:  Hossein-Ali Nikbakht; Javad Shokri-Shirvani; Hassan Ashrafian-Amiri; Haleh Ghaem; Ali Jafarnia; Sedigheh Alijanpour; Seyed-Mostaffa Mirzad; Soheil Hassanipour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.