Literature DB >> 27485306

Altered corticospinal function during movement preparation in humans with spinal cord injury.

Paolo Federico1, Monica A Perez1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: In uninjured humans, transmission in the corticospinal pathway changes in a task-dependent manner during movement preparation. We investigated whether this ability is preserved in humans with incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Our results show that corticospinal excitability is altered in the preparatory phase of an upcoming movement when there is a need to suppress but not to execute rapid index finger voluntary contractions in individuals with SCI compared with controls. This is probably related to impaired transmission at a cortical and spinal level after SCI. Overall our findings indicate that deficits in corticospinal transmission in humans with chronic incomplete SCI are also present in the preparatory phase of upcoming movements. ABSTRACT: Corticospinal output is modulated in a task-dependent manner during the preparatory phase of upcoming movements in humans. Whether this ability is preserved after spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. In this study, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical (MEPs) and subcortical (CMEPs) stimulation of corticospinal axons and short-interval intracortical inhibition in the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the preparatory phase of a reaction time task where individuals with chronic incomplete cervical SCI and age-matched controls needed to suppress (NOGO) or initiate (GO) ballistic index finger isometric voluntary contractions. Reaction times were prolonged in SCI participants compared with control subjects and stimulation was provided ∼90 ms prior to movement onset in each group. During NOGO trials, both MEPs and CMEPs remained unchanged compared to baseline in SCI participants but were suppressed in control subjects. Notably, during GO trials, MEPs increased to a similar extent in both groups but CMEPs increased only in controls. The magnitude of short-interval intracortical inhibition increased in controls but not in SCI subjects during NOGO trials and decreased in both groups in GO trials. These novel observations reveal that humans with incomplete cervical SCI have an altered ability to modulate corticospinal excitability during movement preparation when there is a need to suppress but not to execute upcoming rapid finger movements, which is probably related to impaired transmission at a cortical and spinal level. Thus, deficits in corticospinal transmission after human SCI extend to the preparatory phase of upcoming movements.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor cortex; movement inhibition; movement preparation; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485306      PMCID: PMC5199749          DOI: 10.1113/JP272266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  56 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Human cortical activities during Go/NoGo tasks with opposite motor control paradigms.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamanaka; Toshitaka Kimura; Makoto Miyazaki; Noritaka Kawashima; Daichi Nozaki; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Hideo Yano; Yoshiharu Yamamoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract.

Authors:  J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-04

4.  Higher anticipated force required a stronger inhibitory process in go/nogo tasks.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Koji Inui; Toshiaki Wasaka; Yohei Tamura; Kosuke Akatsuka; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; T Furubayashi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; D J Crammond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; N Petersen; J E Butler; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Slowed down: response time deficits in well-recovered subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Rob Labruyère; Marion Zimmerli; Hubertus J van Hedel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  N D Schluter; M F Rushworth; R E Passingham; K R Mills
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  12 in total

1.  Nothing either good or bad but action makes it so.

Authors:  Jonathan R Wolpaw; Aiko K Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cortical contributions to anticipatory postural adjustments in the trunk.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chiou; Madeleine Hurry; Thomas Reed; Jing Xiao Quek; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Reticulospinal Contributions to Gross Hand Function after Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Stuart N Baker; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Phase-dependent deficits during reach-to-grasp after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A novel cortical target to enhance hand motor output in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jinyi Long; Paolo Federico; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Spinal Cord Injury and Loss of Cortical Inhibition.

Authors:  Bruno Benedetti; Annika Weidenhammer; Maximilian Reisinger; Sebastien Couillard-Despres
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Operant conditioning of the tibialis anterior motor evoked potential in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Rachel H Cote; Janice M Sniffen; Jodi A Brangaccio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modulation of corticospinal output in agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles during motor preparation.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Martin Gagné; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stimulating the Healthy Brain to Investigate Neural Correlates of Motor Preparation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Acute intermittent hypoxia boosts spinal plasticity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Lasse Christiansen; Bing Chen; Yuming Lei; M A Urbin; Michael S A Richardson; Martin Oudega; Milap Sandhu; W Zev Rymer; Randy D Trumbower; Gordon S Mitchell; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 5.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.