Oliver von Richter1, Giorgio Massimini2, Holger Scheible3, Istvan Udvaros4, Andreas Johne1. 1. Merck KGaA, Clinical Pharmacology, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany. 2. Merck KGaA, Early Clinical Oncology, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany. 3. Merck KGaA, DMPK, 85567, Grafing, Germany. 4. PRA International, EDS Patient Pharmacology, 1076, Budapest, Hungary.
Abstract
AIM: This trial (NCT: 01713036) investigated the absolute bioavailability, mass balance and metabolite profile of pimasertib in a new design combining these investigations in a single group of patients. METHODS: Six male patients with pathologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1. In Part A of the trial, patients received a 60 mg oral dose of unlabelled pimasertib followed by an intravenous (i.v.) tracer dose of [14 C]pimasertib 2 μg (equalling 9 kBq) as a bolus injection, one hour after the oral dose, on Day 1. On Day 8, all patients received 60 mg pimasertib capsules spiked with 2.6 MBq of [14 C]pimasertib. Patients received 60 mg oral unlabelled pimasertib twice daily from Day 3 to Day 21 of Part A and in subsequent 21-day cycles in Part B. RESULTS: Following i.v. administration, [14 C]pimasertib exhibited a geometric mean total body clearance of 45.7 l h-1 (geometric coefficient of variation [geometric CV]: 47.2%) and a volume of distribution of 229 l (geometric CV: 42.0%). Absolute bioavailability was 73%. The majority of the oral [14 C] dose (85.1%) was recovered in excreta. Total radioactivity was mainly excreted into urine (52.8%) and faeces (30.7%) with 78.9% of the [14 C] dose recovered as metabolites. Two major circulating metabolites were identified in plasma: a carboxylic acid (M445) and a phosphoethanolamine conjugate (M554). The safety profile was in line with the published pimasertib trials. CONCLUSION: Pimasertib showed a favourable pharmacokinetic profile with high absolute bioavailability and a unique metabolic pathway (conjugation with phosphoethanolamine).
AIM: This trial (NCT: 01713036) investigated the absolute bioavailability, mass balance and metabolite profile of pimasertib in a new design combining these investigations in a single group of patients. METHODS: Six male patients with pathologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1. In Part A of the trial, patients received a 60 mg oral dose of unlabelled pimasertib followed by an intravenous (i.v.) tracer dose of [14 C]pimasertib 2 μg (equalling 9 kBq) as a bolus injection, one hour after the oral dose, on Day 1. On Day 8, all patients received 60 mg pimasertib capsules spiked with 2.6 MBq of [14 C]pimasertib. Patients received 60 mg oral unlabelled pimasertib twice daily from Day 3 to Day 21 of Part A and in subsequent 21-day cycles in Part B. RESULTS: Following i.v. administration, [14 C]pimasertib exhibited a geometric mean total body clearance of 45.7 l h-1 (geometric coefficient of variation [geometric CV]: 47.2%) and a volume of distribution of 229 l (geometric CV: 42.0%). Absolute bioavailability was 73%. The majority of the oral [14 C] dose (85.1%) was recovered in excreta. Total radioactivity was mainly excreted into urine (52.8%) and faeces (30.7%) with 78.9% of the [14 C] dose recovered as metabolites. Two major circulating metabolites were identified in plasma: a carboxylic acid (M445) and a phosphoethanolamine conjugate (M554). The safety profile was in line with the published pimasertib trials. CONCLUSION:Pimasertib showed a favourable pharmacokinetic profile with high absolute bioavailability and a unique metabolic pathway (conjugation with phosphoethanolamine).
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Erika Martinelli; Teresa Troiani; Elena D'Aiuto; Floriana Morgillo; Donata Vitagliano; Anna Capasso; Sarah Costantino; Loreta Pia Ciuffreda; Francesco Merolla; Loredana Vecchione; Veerle De Vriendt; Sabine Tejpar; Anna Nappi; Vincenzo Sforza; Giulia Martini; Liberato Berrino; Raffaele De Palma; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: May Y K Ho; Michael J Morris; Jill L Pirhalla; John W Bauman; Carolyn B Pendry; Keith W Orford; Royce A Morrison; Donna S Cox Journal: Xenobiotica Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 1.908
Authors: Jerson L Silva; Carolina G S Lima; Luciana P Rangel; Giulia D S Ferretti; Fernanda P Pauli; Ruan C B Ribeiro; Thais de B da Silva; Fernando C da Silva; Vitor F Ferreira Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2020-04-20
Authors: Kinga B Stopa; Agnieszka A Kusiak; Mateusz D Szopa; Pawel E Ferdek; Monika A Jakubowska Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.923