| Literature DB >> 27483256 |
Sheng-Hsiang Li1,2, Yuh-Ming Hwu3,4,5,6, Chung-Hao Lu7, Hsiao-Ho Chang8, Cheng-En Hsieh9, Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee10,11,12.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) on revascularization, survival, and oocyte quality of cryopreserved, subcutaneously-transplanted mouse ovarian tissue. Autologous subcutaneous transplantation of vitrified-thawed mouse ovarian tissues treated with (experimental group) or without (control group) VEGF and FGF2 was performed. After transplantation to the inguinal region for two or three weeks, graft survival, angiogenesis, follicle development, and oocyte quality were examined after gonadotropin administration. VEGF coupled with FGF2 (VEGF/FGF2) promoted revascularization and significantly increased the survival rate of subcutaneously-transplanted cryopreserved ovarian tissues compared with untreated controls. The two growth factors did not show long-term effects on the ovarian grafts. In contrast to the untreated ovarian grafts, active folliculogenesis was revealed as the number of follicles at various stages and of mature oocytes in antral follicles after gonadotropin administration were remarkably higher in the VEGF/FGF2-treated groups. Although the fertilization rate was similar between the VEGF/FGF2 and control groups, the oocyte quality was much better in the VEGF/FGF2-treated grafts as demonstrated by the higher ratio of blastocyst development. Introducing angiogenic factors, such as VEGF and FGF2, may be a promising strategy to improve revascularization, survival, and oocyte quality of cryopreserved, subcutaneously-transplanted mouse ovarian tissue.Entities:
Keywords: angiogenic factor; fertility reservation; oocyte quality; ovarian cryopreservation; ovarian transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27483256 PMCID: PMC5000635 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17081237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure A1Experimental scheme of this study. The cryopreserved mouse ovarian tissues were autologously transplanted to the subcutaneous site of the inguinal region. The VEGF/FGF2-treated ovarian tissues were implanted into one side of the subcutaneous space, and the ones without treatment of VEGF/FGF2 were inserted into the opposite side of the same mouse. For the assay purpose, ovarian grafts were removed one, two, or three weeks after transplantation as shown on the diagram.
Figure 1Morphology, survival rate, and blood vessels of the cryopreserved ovarian tissue after transplantation. (A) The morphologies of the grafted ovarian tissue. Left: VEGF/FGF2-treated tissue; right: untreated control tissue. An arrow shows the larger blood vessel; (B) The survival rate of the grafted ovarian tissue two and three weeks after transplantation. Survival rate is defined in the text. ** p < 0.01 compared with relative control group; (C–F) Immunohistochemical staining of vessels. The von Willebrand factor (vWF) protein, a marker of the endothelial cells of blood vessels, was stained red-brown (where arrow pointed); (G,H) Representative photos of H&E-stained ovarian sections show the morphology of ovarian grafts two weeks after transplantation. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Figure 2Analysis of protein levels of angiogenic cytokines in the grafted ovarian tissues treated with or without VEGF and FGF2. The grafted ovarian tissues one, two, and three weeks (A–C, respectively) after transplantation were retrieved. The relative amount of angiogenic cytokines determined by ELISA was represented as bar charts.
Comparison of the average number of follicles in subcutaneously transplanted cryopreserved ovarian tissue, treated with or without vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), after gonadotropin administration.
| Gonadotropins | Untreated Control | VEGF/FGF2 Treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IU | PMF | PF | PAF | AF | PMF | PF | PAF | AF |
| 0 | 22.50 ± 10.65 | 17.33 ± 6.12 | 12.00 ± 2.97 ** | 12.00 ± 4.69 | 21.17 ± 21.08 | 13.67 ± 11.06 | 6.33 ± 3.88 | 6.33 ± 6.71 |
| 50 | 22.14 ± 14.37 | 12.29 ± 10.72 | 5.86 ± 7.31 | 6.71 ± 5.71 | 38.43 ± 17.60 * | 27.71 ± 13.78 * | 8.14 ± 7.38 | 13.14 ± 10.56 |
| 150 | 29.36 ± 13.50 | 13.91 ± 10.89 | 8.64 ± 5.92 | 6.73 ± 6.07 | 36.64 ± 22.35 | 24.09 ± 13.74 * | 11.73 ± 6.48 | 17.91 ± 12.19 * |
| 250 | 15.75 ± 12.09 | 9.75 ± 8.66 | 4.25 ± 3.86 | 4.50 ± 5.26 | 52.75 ± 13.84 ** | 39.25 ± 15.11 * | 18.00 ± 11.80 | 18.00 ± 16.75 |
Data represent the mean ± SD of the number of follicles at each stages (for 0, 50, 150, and 250 IU, n = 6, 7, 11, and 4, respectively). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the untreated control. IU, international unit; PMF, primordial follicle; PF, primary follicle; PAF, preantral follicle; AF, antral follicle.
Outcomes of oocyte maturation in antral follicles collected from cryopreserved, subcutaneously-transplanted ovarian tissue, treated with or without VEGF and FGF2, after gonadotropin administration.
| Oocyte Status | No. Oocytes—Control | No. Oocytes—VEGF/FGF2 |
|---|---|---|
| GV | 111 (69%) | 98 (51%) |
| MI | 18 (11%) | 28 (14%) |
| MII | 33 (20%) | 65 (35%) |
| Total No. oocytes | 162 | 191 |
Three weeks after transplantation, mice (n = 24) grafted with ovarian tissue were treated with 150 IU gonadotropins, and various stages of oocytes were collected from the antral follicles of the ovarian grafts. GV, germinal vesicle; MI, metaphase I; MII, metaphase II.
Figure 3The effect of VEGF and FGF2 on the rate of metaphase II (MII) oocyte, fertilization, and blastocyst development. Mice (n = 24) grafted with ovarian tissue three weeks after transplantation were treated with 150 IU gonadotropins, and MII oocytes were collected from the antral follicles for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Fertilization oocytes were cultured to the blastocyst stage. (A) The rate of MII oocytes; (B) fertilization rate; and (C) the rate of blastocyst formation. These results were statistically analyzed using the relative percentage data shown in Table S3. Values are the mean ± SD of six independent experiments (n = 4 each). * p < 0.05 compared with the control group.