Literature DB >> 21630429

Vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor 2 delivery from spinal cord bridges to enhance angiogenesis following injury.

Laura De Laporte1, Anne des Rieux, Hannah M Tuinstra, Marina L Zelivyanskaya, Nora M De Clerck, Andrei A Postnov, Véronique Préat, Lonnie D Shea.   

Abstract

The host response to spinal cord injury can lead to an ischemic environment that can induce cell death and limits cell transplantation approaches to promote spinal cord regeneration. Spinal cord bridges that provide a localized and sustained release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) were investigated for their ability to promote angiogenesis and nerve growth within the injury. Bridges were fabricated by fusion of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres using a gas foaming/particulate leaching technique, and proteins were incorporated by encapsulation into the microspheres and/or mixing with the microspheres before foaming. Compared to the mixing method, encapsulation reduced the losses during leaching and had a slower protein release, while VEGF was released more rapidly than FGF-2. In vivo implantation of bridges loaded with VEGF enhanced the levels of VEGF within the injury at 1 week, and bridges releasing VEGF and FGF-2 increased the infiltration of endothelial cells and the formation of blood vessel at 6 weeks postimplantation. Additionally, substantial neurofilament staining was observed within the bridge; however, no significant difference was observed between bridges with or without protein. Bridges releasing angiogenic factors may provide an approach to overcome an ischemic environment that limits regeneration and cell transplantation-based approaches.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21630429      PMCID: PMC3190227          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  53 in total

Review 1.  VEGF: once regarded as a specific angiogenic factor, now implicated in neuroprotection.

Authors:  Erik Storkebaum; Diether Lambrechts; Peter Carmeliet
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells.

Authors:  Qin Shen; Susan K Goderie; Li Jin; Nithin Karanth; Yu Sun; Natalia Abramova; Peter Vincent; Kevin Pumiglia; Sally Temple
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Microenvironmental VEGF concentration, not total dose, determines a threshold between normal and aberrant angiogenesis.

Authors:  Clare R Ozawa; Andrea Banfi; Nicole L Glazer; Gavin Thurston; Matthew L Springer; Peggy E Kraft; Donald M McDonald; Helen M Blau
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Cryogenic prototyping of chitosan scaffolds with controlled micro and macro architecture and their effect on in vivo neo-vascularization and cellular infiltration.

Authors:  Tze Chiun Lim; Kerm Sin Chian; Kah Fai Leong
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Engineering vascular networks in porous polymer matrices.

Authors:  Martin C Peters; Peter J Polverini; David J Mooney
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-06-15

6.  Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on motor neuron degeneration.

Authors:  Ludo Van Den Bosch; Erik Storkebaum; Vicky Vleminckx; Lieve Moons; Ludo Vanopdenbosch; Wendy Scheveneels; Peter Carmeliet; Wim Robberecht
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Potent synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in the induction of angiogenesis in vitro.

Authors:  M S Pepper; N Ferrara; L Orci; R Montesano
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Prevascularization with gelatin microspheres containing basic fibroblast growth factor enhances the benefits of cardiomyocyte transplantation.

Authors:  Yutaka Sakakibara; Kazunobu Nishimura; Keiichi Tambara; Masaya Yamamoto; Fanglin Lu; Yasuhiko Tabata; Masashi Komeda
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Vascular endothelial growth factor improves functional outcome and decreases secondary degeneration in experimental spinal cord contusion injury.

Authors:  J Widenfalk; A Lipson; M Jubran; C Hofstetter; T Ebendal; Y Cao; L Olson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Promotion of regeneration of corticospinal tract axons in rats with recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor alone and combined with adenovirus coding for this factor.

Authors:  Francesco Facchiano; Eduardo Fernandez; Salvatore Mancarella; Giulio Maira; Massimo Miscusi; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Graziella Cimino-Reale; Maria Laura Falchetti; Maurizio C Capogrossi; Roberto Pallini
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  Heparin-chitosan nanoparticle functionalization of porous poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for localized lentivirus delivery of angiogenic factors.

Authors:  Aline M Thomas; Andrew J Gomez; Jaime L Palma; Woon Teck Yap; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Hydrogels for lentiviral gene delivery.

Authors:  Stephanie K Seidlits; Robert Michael Gower; Jaclyn A Shepard; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 3.  Gene delivery strategies to promote spinal cord repair.

Authors:  Christopher M Walthers; Stephanie K Seidlits
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2015-04-09

4.  Effect of Local Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Subcutaneously Allotransplanted Ovarian Tissue in Ovariectomized Mice.

Authors:  Jiangman Gao; Ying Huang; Min Li; Hongcui Zhao; Yue Zhao; Rong Li; Jie Yan; Yang Yu; Jie Qiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A perspective on the role of class III semaphorin signaling in central nervous system trauma.

Authors:  Vasil Mecollari; Bart Nieuwenhuis; Joost Verhaagen
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Angiogenic microspheres promote neural regeneration and motor function recovery after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Shukui Yu; Shenglian Yao; Yujun Wen; Ying Wang; Hao Wang; Qunyuan Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  VEGF and FGF2 Improve Revascularization, Survival, and Oocyte Quality of Cryopreserved, Subcutaneously-Transplanted Mouse Ovarian Tissues.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsiang Li; Yuh-Ming Hwu; Chung-Hao Lu; Hsiao-Ho Chang; Cheng-En Hsieh; Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  The Role of Biomaterials as Angiogenic Modulators of Spinal Cord Injury: Mimetics of the Spinal Cord, Cell and Angiogenic Factor Delivery Agents.

Authors:  Luís A Rocha; Rui A Sousa; David A Learmonth; António J Salgado
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Spinal Cord Molecular and Cellular Changes Induced by Adenoviral Vector- and Cell-Mediated Triple Gene Therapy after Severe Contusion.

Authors:  Andrei A Izmailov; Tatyana V Povysheva; Farid V Bashirov; Mikhail E Sokolov; Filip O Fadeev; Ravil R Garifulin; Boris S Naroditsky; Denis Y Logunov; Ilnur I Salafutdinov; Yuri A Chelyshev; Rustem R Islamov; Igor A Lavrov
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Bridging the lesion-engineering a permissive substrate for nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Liliana R Pires; Ana P Pêgo
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2015-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.