BACKGROUND: The etiology of hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) is often multidrug-resistant infections. The evaluation of new antibacterial drugs for efficacy in this population is important, as many antibacterial drugs have demonstrated limitations when studied in this population. HABP/VABP trials are expensive and challenging to conduct due to protocol complexity and low patient enrollment, among other factors. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) seeks to advance antibacterial drug development by streamlining HABP/VABP clinical trials to improve efficiency and feasibility while maintaining ethical rigor, patient safety, information value, and scientific validity. METHODS: In 2013, CTTI engaged a multidisciplinary group of experts to discuss challenges impeding the conduct of HABP/VABP trials. Separate workstreams identified challenges associated with HABP/VABP protocol complexity. The Project Team developed potential solutions to streamline HABP/VABP trials using a Quality by Design approach. RESULTS: CTTI recommendations focus on 4 key areas to improve HABP/VABP trials: informed consent processes/practices, protocol design, choice of an institutional review board (IRB), and trial outcomes. Informed consent processes should include legally authorized representatives. Protocol design decisions should focus on eligibility criteria, prestudy antibacterial therapy considerations, use of new diagnostics, and sample size. CTTI recommends that sponsors use a central IRB and discuss trial endpoints with regulators, including defining a clinical failure and evaluating the impact of concomitant antibacterial drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Streamlining HABP/VABP trials by addressing key protocol elements can improve trial startup and patient recruitment/retention, reduce trial complexity and costs, and ensure patient safety while advancing antibacterial drug development.
BACKGROUND: The etiology of hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) is often multidrug-resistant infections. The evaluation of new antibacterial drugs for efficacy in this population is important, as many antibacterial drugs have demonstrated limitations when studied in this population. HABP/VABP trials are expensive and challenging to conduct due to protocol complexity and low patient enrollment, among other factors. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) seeks to advance antibacterial drug development by streamlining HABP/VABP clinical trials to improve efficiency and feasibility while maintaining ethical rigor, patient safety, information value, and scientific validity. METHODS: In 2013, CTTI engaged a multidisciplinary group of experts to discuss challenges impeding the conduct of HABP/VABP trials. Separate workstreams identified challenges associated with HABP/VABP protocol complexity. The Project Team developed potential solutions to streamline HABP/VABP trials using a Quality by Design approach. RESULTS:CTTI recommendations focus on 4 key areas to improve HABP/VABP trials: informed consent processes/practices, protocol design, choice of an institutional review board (IRB), and trial outcomes. Informed consent processes should include legally authorized representatives. Protocol design decisions should focus on eligibility criteria, prestudy antibacterial therapy considerations, use of new diagnostics, and sample size. CTTI recommends that sponsors use a central IRB and discuss trial endpoints with regulators, including defining a clinical failure and evaluating the impact of concomitant antibacterial drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Streamlining HABP/VABP trials by addressing key protocol elements can improve trial startup and patient recruitment/retention, reduce trial complexity and costs, and ensure patient safety while advancing antibacterial drug development.
Authors: Truc T Tran; Sara Gomez Villegas; Samuel L Aitken; Susan M Butler-Wu; Alex Soriano; Brian J Werth; Jose M Munita Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Stephen P Bergin; Adrian Coles; Sara B Calvert; John Farley; John H Powers; Marcus J Zervos; Matthew Sims; Marin H Kollef; Michael J Durkin; Badih A Kabchi; Helen K Donnelly; Ana Cecilia Bardossy; Claire Greenshields; Daniel Rubin; Jie-Lena Sun; Karen Chiswell; Jonas Santiago; Peidi Gu; Pamela Tenaerts; Vance G Fowler; Thomas L Holland Journal: Chest Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Antoni Torres; Doug Rank; David Melnick; Ludmyla Rekeda; Xiang Chen; Todd Riccobene; Ian A Critchley; Hassan D Lakkis; Dianna Taylor; Angela K Talley Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Amy Corneli; Sara B Calvert; John H Powers; Teresa Swezey; Deborah Collyar; Brian Perry; John J Farley; Jonas Santiago; Helen K Donnelly; Carisa De Anda; Katelyn Blanchard; Vance G Fowler; Thomas L Holland Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-05-01
Authors: Ajay Sheshadri; Myrna Godoy; Jeremy J Erasmus; Stephen Gruschkus; Arain Hasan; Scott E Evans; Javier Barreda-Garcia; Roy F Chemaly; Burton Dickey; David Ost Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2019-12-23
Authors: Jessica E Ericson; John McGuire; Marian G Michaels; Adam Schwarz; Robert Frenck; Jaime G Deville; Swati Agarwal; Adam M Bressler; Jamie Gao; Tracy Spears; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith; John S Bradley Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.806
Authors: Stella Stergiopoulos; Sara B Calvert; Carrie A Brown; Josephine Awatin; Pamela Tenaerts; Thomas L Holland; Joseph A DiMasi; Kenneth A Getz Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Amy Corneli; Brian Perry; Deborah Collyar; John H Powers; John J Farley; Sara B Calvert; Jonas Santiago; Helen K Donnelly; Teresa Swezey; Carrie B Dombeck; Carisa De Anda; Vance G Fowler; Thomas L Holland Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-12-07