| Literature DB >> 27481364 |
Yoon Young Cho1,2,3, Kee-Ho Song4, Young Nam Kim1, Seong Hee Ahn5,6, Hyeonmok Kim5, Sooyoun Park4, Sunghwan Suh7, Beom-Jun Kim5, Soo-Youn Lee8, Sail Chun9, Jung-Min Koh5, Seung Hun Lee10, Jae Hyeon Kim11,12,13.
Abstract
The development of advanced imaging techniques has increased the detection of subclinical pheochromocytomas. Because of the substantial proportions of subclinical pheochromocytomas, measurement of urine metanephrine concentrations is crucial due to detect or exclude pheochromocytoma. Although urine metanephrines are elevated in symptomatic subjects, diagnostic cut-offs according to the presence of adrenergic symptoms have not been studied. Pheochromocytomas patients who underwent adrenalectomy at Samsung Medical Center and a control group were compared to determine cut-off concentrations of urine metanephrines. An independent population was analyzed for urine metanephrines with different kits to validate the improvement in diagnostic accuracy using adjusted cut-offs. Symptom-dependent cut-offs of urine metanephrines were higher for symptomatic patients (307 μg/day in males, 235 μg/day in females for urine metanephrine, and 1,045 μg/day in males and 457 μg/day in females for urine normetanephrine) than for asymptomatic patients (206 μg/day in males, 199 μg/day in females for urine metanephrine, and 489 μg/day in males and 442 μg/day in females for urine normetanephrine). Symptom-dependent cut-offs of urine metanephrines improved a specificity from 92.7 % to 96.3 % and a high sensitivity of 97.8 % was maintained. Using the Symptom-dependent cut-offs raised diagnostic accuracy by 5.5 % (p <0.001). Similar trend was also observed in an independent population using different hormone kits. Using symptom-dependent cut-offs of urine metanephrines in symptomatic patients for pheochromocytomas resulted in a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy in two separate cohorts.Entities:
Keywords: Pheochromocytoma; Republic of Korea; Symptom; Urine metanephrine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27481364 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-016-1049-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrine ISSN: 1355-008X Impact factor: 3.633