Literature DB >> 23572424

Multiple gene polymorphisms can improve prediction of nonvertebral fracture in postmenopausal women.

Seung Hun Lee1, Seon Woo Lee, Seong Hee Ahn, Taehyeung Kim, Kyeong-Hye Lim, Beom-Jun Kim, Eun-Hee Cho, Sang-Wook Kim, Tae-Ho Kim, Ghi Su Kim, Shin-Yoon Kim, Jung-Min Koh, Changwon Kang.   

Abstract

Clinical risk factors (CRFs), with or without bone mineral density (BMD), are used to determine the risk of osteoporotic fracture (OF), which has a heritable component. In this study we investigated whether genetic profiling can additionally improve the ability to predict OF. Using 1229 unrelated Korean postmenopausal women, 39 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 30 human genomic loci were tested for association with osteoporosis-related traits, such as BMD, osteoporosis, vertebral fracture (VF), nonvertebral fracture (NVF), and any fracture. To estimate the effects of genetic profiling, the genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated using five prediction models: (Model I) GRSs only; (Model II) BMD only; (Model III) CRFs only; (Model IV) CRFs and BMD; and (Model V) CRFs, BMD, and GRS. A total of 21 SNPs within 19 genes associated with one or more osteoporosis-related traits and were included for GRS calculation. GRS associated with BMD before and after adjustment for CRFs (p ranging from <0.001 to 0.018). GRS associated with NVF before and after adjustment for CRFs and BMD (p ranging from 0.017 to 0.045), and with any fracture after adjustment for CRFs and femur neck BMD (p = 0.049). In terms of predicting NVF, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for Model I was 0.55, which was lower than the AUCs of Models II (0.60), III (0.64), and IV (0.65). Adding GRS to Model IV (in Model V) increased the AUC to 0.67, and improved the accuracy of NVF classification by 11.5% (p = 0.014). In terms of predicting any fracture, the AUC of Model V (0.68) was similar to that of Model IV (0.68), and Model V did not significantly improve the accuracy of any fracture classification (p = 0.39). Thus, genetic profiling may enhance the accuracy of NVF predictions and help to delineate the intervention threshold.
© 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRACTURE; GENETIC PROFILING; INDIVIDUALIZED PROGNOSIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; RECLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23572424     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

1.  Genetics help predict the risk of non-vertebral factures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-07-24

2.  Symptom-dependent cut-offs of urine metanephrines improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting pheochromocytomas in two separate cohorts, compared to symptom-independent cut-offs.

Authors:  Yoon Young Cho; Kee-Ho Song; Young Nam Kim; Seong Hee Ahn; Hyeonmok Kim; Sooyoun Park; Sunghwan Suh; Beom-Jun Kim; Soo-Youn Lee; Sail Chun; Jung-Min Koh; Seung Hun Lee; Jae Hyeon Kim
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  BMP7 gene polymorphisms are not associated with bone mineral density or osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  Li-Hong Gao; Shan-Shan Li; Chong Shao; Wen-Zhen Fu; Yu-Juan Liu; Jin-Wei He; Zhen-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Impact of the environment on the skeleton: is it modulated by genetic factors?

Authors:  Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Improved prediction of fracture risk leveraging a genome-wide polygenic risk score.

Authors:  Tianyuan Lu; Vincenzo Forgetta; Julyan Keller-Baruch; Maria Nethander; Derrick Bennett; Marie Forest; Sahir Bhatnagar; Robin G Walters; Kuang Lin; Zhengming Chen; Liming Li; Magnus Karlsson; Dan Mellström; Eric Orwoll; Eugene V McCloskey; John A Kanis; William D Leslie; Robert J Clarke; Claes Ohlsson; Celia M T Greenwood; J Brent Richards
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 11.117

6.  Genetic risk score based on the prevalence of vertebral fracture in Japanese women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Heying Zhou; Seijiro Mori; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Atsushi Takahashi; Koichi Matsuda; Yukihiro Koretsune; Shiro Minami; Masahiko Higashiyama; Shinji Imai; Kozo Yoshimori; Minoru Doita; Akira Yamada; Satoshi Nagayama; Kazuo Kaneko; Satoshi Asai; Masaki Shiono; Michiaki Kubo; Hideki Ito
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2016-07-12

7.  Genetic risk factors identified in populations of European descent do not improve the prediction of osteoporotic fracture and bone mineral density in Chinese populations.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Li; Cheng Peng; Ji-Gang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Chao Xu; Yong Lin; Xiao-Ying Fu; Qing Tian; Lei Zhang; Yang Xiang; Victor Sheng; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Performance of FRAX in Predicting Fractures in US Postmenopausal Women with Varied Race and Genetic Profiles.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Xiangxue Xiao; Yingke Xu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.