| Literature DB >> 27478511 |
Juan de Toro-Martín1, Frédéric Guénard1, André Tchernof2, Yves Deshaies3, Louis Pérusse4, Frédéric-Simon Hould5, Stéfane Lebel5, Picard Marceau5, Marie-Claude Vohl1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The TOMM20 gene was previously identified as differentially expressed and methylated between severely obese subjects with and without metabolic syndrome (MS). Since metabolic complications do not affect all obese patients to the same extent, the aim of this study was to identify methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTL) potentially associated with MS-related complications within the TOMM20 locus.Entities:
Keywords: Lipid profile; Obesity; TOMM20; Visceral adipose tissue; meQTL
Year: 2016 PMID: 27478511 PMCID: PMC4966599 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-016-0171-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Characteristics of subjects
| Study population | Methylation sub-population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS+ | MS− | MS+ | MS− | |
| Number of subjects | 1402 | 315 | 25 | 23 |
| Age (years) | 43.9 ± 10.5 | 38.7 ± 9.8*** | 33.9 ± 9.4 | 32.0 ± 7.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 51.8 ± 8.5 | 51.3 ± 8.7 | 52.6 ± 12.7 | 52.3 ± 8.4 |
| Waist girth (cm) | 141.5 ± 17.2 | 135.6 ± 18.5*** | 149.4 ± 24.8 | 143.3 ± 17.1 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 6.85 ± 2.43 | 5.11 ± 0.98*** | 6.61 ± 2.79 | 4.95 ± 0.46** |
| Lipid profile (mmol/L) | ||||
| Total-C | 4.67 ± 0.96 | 4.80 ± 0.82* | 4.93 ± 0.75 | 4.47 ± 0.87** |
| LDL-C | 2.65 ± 0.83 | 2.79 ± 0.75** | 2.89 ± 0.65 | 2.68 ± 0.77 |
| HDL-C | 1.18 ± 0.32 | 1.49 ± 0.37*** | 0.96 ± 0.19 | 1.28 ± 0.17*** |
| TG | 1.97 ± 1.12 | 1.17 ± 0.37*** | 2.40 ± 1.30 | 1.12 ± 0.45*** |
| Total-C/HDL-C | 4.18 ± 1.34 | 3.33 ± 0.74*** | 5.32 ± 1.49 | 3.51 ± 0.56*** |
| Blood pressure (mm Hg) | ||||
| SBP | 139 ± 16.7 | 134.7 ± 15.7*** | 145 ± 19.8 | 130.8 ± 13.2** |
| DBP | 84 ± 11.3 | 83.0 ± 10.3 | 89 ± 12.0 | 78.0 ± 9.7** |
Metabolic and anthropometric values in the study population (n = 1720) and in the methylation sub-population (n = 48) of severely obese subjects with and without MS (MS+ and MS−, respectively). Data is expressed as mean ±SD. Asterisks stand for significant differences between MS+ vs. MS− subjects using unpaired Student’s t test (*** P ≤ 0.0001, ** P ≤ 0.01, * P ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant)
BMI body mass index, Total-C total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG triglycerides, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure
Fig. 1Methylation profile and linkage disequilibrium (LD) map within the TOMM20 locus. The upper part of the figure shows mean methylation levels of the 20 CpG (CpG island—grey bars; upstream and downstream regions—black bars) identified within TOMM20 locus in visceral adipose tissue samples (n = 48). Methylation levels shown as average β values ranging from 0 (unmethylated) to 1 (completely methylated). The lower part shows the LD map of genotyped and imputed SNPs within TOMM20 locus in the study population (n = 1720), considering the CEU panel (Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry) of the latest release of the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3). LD r2 values (%) are shown in boxes. The imputed SNP is marked with an asterisk
Fig. 2Mean degree of cg10738648 methylation for each meQTL identified in visceral adipose tissue samples. CpG methylation levels are shown as average β values ranging from 0 (unmethylated) to 1 (completely methylated). Values presented (mean ± SE) and P values were obtained by general linear models (type III sum of squares) adjusted for the effect of age, sex and BMI (n = 48). Pairwise comparisons among genotype groups were performed using least square means (LS-means) and asterisks represent significant differences vs. common homozygotes. ***P ≤ 0.0001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05
Haplotype and diplotype patterns and frequencies for TOMM20
| Haplotypes (H) | rs4567344 (A > G) | rs11301 (T > C) | rs4551650 (G > A) | rs17523127 (G > C) | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 25.3 |
| H2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10.1 |
| H3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 35.1 |
| H4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29.5 |
| Diplotypes | |||||
| H1/H1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 6.6 |
| H1/H2 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 5.1 |
| H1/H3 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 18.0 |
| H1/H4 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/0 | 1/0 | 14.4 |
| H2/H2 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0.7 |
| H2/H3 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 7.2 |
| H2/H4 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/0 | 1/0 | 6.3 |
| H3/H3a | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 12.0 |
| H3/H4 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 1/0 | 1/0 | 21.2 |
| H4/H4 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8.6 |
Numbers 1 and 0 indicate common and rare allele, respectively
aThe reference diplotype
Diplotype- and sex-based logistic regression analysis
| All | Men | Women | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wald χ2 ( | OR (95 % CI) | Wald χ2 ( | OR (95 % CI) | Wald χ2 ( | OR (95 % CI) | ||
| Total-C | H1/H2 | 5.9 ( | 2.03 (1.59–3.59) | 4.7 ( | 3.00 (1.11–8.06) | 1.7 (0.19) | 1.60 (0.79–3–24) |
| H1/H3 | 1.5 (0.23) | 1.29 (0.85–1.96) | 4.3 ( | 2.10 (1.04–4.25) | 0.0 (0.99) | 1.00 (0.60–1.68) | |
| LDL–C | H1/H2 | 4.6 ( | 1.86 (1.06–3.27) | 6.2 ( | 3.54 (1.31–9.58) | 0.6 (0.45) | 1.31 (0.65–2.62) |
| H1/H3 | 1.9 (0.17) | 1.34 (0.89–2.02) | 7.1 ( | 2.64 (1.29–5.41) | 0.1 (0.80) | 0.94 (0.57–1.55) | |
| TG | H1/H2 | 8.1 ( | 2.19 (1.28–3.74) | 9.8 ( | 7.02 (2.07–13.76) | 1.4 (0.24) | 1.46 (0.78–272) |
| H1/H3 | 3.3 ( | 1.53 (1.03–2.26) | 6.1 ( | 2.43 (1.20–4.93) | 0.3 (0.57) | 1.14 (0.73–1.78) | |
Diplotype-based logistic regression analyses were fitted including sex, age and BMI as confounding factors in the entire population (n = 1720), and including age and BMI when men and women were analyzed separately (n = 537 and n = 1183, respectively). The H3/H3 diplotype was set as the reference group for comparison purposes since it carries wild type alleles of the four meQTLs tested. Significant Wald-tests are shown in italic face (P ≤ 0.05)
OR odds ratio, CI 95 % Wald’s confidence intervals, Total-C total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG triglycerides
Fig. 3Mean methylation levels of cg10738648 for each diplotype and a schematic representation of Erg1-binding sites. a Mean degree of cg16490124 methylation levels for diplotypes in visceral adipose tissue samples. CpG methylation levels are shown as average β values ranging from 0 (unmethylated) to 1 (completely methylated). Values presented (mean ±SE) and P values were obtained by general linear models (type III sum of squares) adjusted for the effect of age, sex and BMI (n = 48). Asterisks represent significant differences vs. H3/H3 (reference diplotype). ***P ≤ 0.0001. b Schematic representation of the TOMM20 promoter region showing Erg1-binding sites (horizontal red bar), CpG island (horizontal green bar), cg16490124 and rs175231127, obtained from ENCODE data in the UCSC genome browser. c Sequence logo is the graphical representation of the Egr1 position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) identified by TRAP and obtained from the Transfac database (ID: M00243). Sequence logo shows the base preference, sized and sorted relative to their occurrence in the PSSM. The location of the CpG-SNP rs175231127 (G > C) within the Egr1-binding site is marked with an arrow