Literature DB >> 27474808

Peripheral blood blast clearance is an independent prognostic factor for survival and response to acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy.

Nicholas J Short1, Christopher B Benton2, Hsiang-Chun Chen3, Peng Qiu4, Lisa Gu5, Sherry Pierce2, Mark Brandt2, Abhishek Maiti6, Taejin L Min5, Kiran Naqvi2, Alfonso Quintas-Cardama7, Marina Konopleva2, Tapan Kadia2, Jorge Cortes2, Guillermo Garcia-Manero2, Farhad Ravandi2, Elias Jabbour2, Hagop Kantarjian2, Michael Andreeff2.   

Abstract

In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), rapid reduction of circulating blasts with induction chemotherapy may serve as an in vivo marker of chemosensitivity. We performed a retrospective analysis of 363 patients with untreated AML who received induction chemotherapy in order to determine the relationship between day of blast disappearance (DOBD) and complete remission (CR) rates, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). DOBD ≤ 5 vs. >5 was identified as the most discriminating cutoff for OS. DOBD > 5 was observed in 35 patients (9.6%). The CR rate for patients with DOBD ≤ 5 vs. >5 was 74.0 and 28.6%, median EFS was 9.4 and 1.8 months, and median OS was 17.1 and 5.8 months, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). DOBD > 5 was independently associated with a lower CR rate and shorter EFS and OS (P < 0.001 for all). DOBD > 5 retained prognostic significance for EFS and OS when patients were stratified by cytogenetic risk group, de novo vs. secondary or therapy-related AML, European LeukemiaNet-based risk groups, and whether CR was achieved. We propose DOBD > 5 as a simple and early marker of disease resistance that identifies patients with poor prognosis who otherwise may not be identified with existing risk stratification systems. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1221-1226, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27474808      PMCID: PMC5118152          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  36 in total

Review 1.  Management of AML: who do we really cure?

Authors:  Jane Liesveld
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  In vivo determination of the fractional kill of human tumor cells by chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  M C Berenbaum
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1972-10

3.  Laboratory models: some historical perspective.

Authors:  H E Skipper
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

4.  Phase I/II study of combination therapy with sorafenib, idarubicin, and cytarabine in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Daniel Jones; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Marina Y Konopleva; Susan O'Brien; Zeev Estrov; Gautam Borthakur; Deborah Thomas; Sherry R Pierce; Mark Brandt; Anna Byrd; B Nebiyou Bekele; Keith Pratz; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Mark Levis; Michael Andreeff; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the "3 + 7" induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Yishai Ofran; Ronit Leiba; Chezi Ganzel; Revital Saban; Moshe Gatt; Ron Ram; Ariela Arad; Shlomo Bulvik; Ilana Hellmann; Sharon Gino-Moor; Tsila Zuckerman; Ron Hoffman; Netanel Horowitz; Noa Lavi; Shimrit Ringelstein; Israel Henig; Michal Hayun; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 6.  Prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukaemia in adults--biological significance and clinical use.

Authors:  Ruediger Liersch; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Wolfgang E Berdel; Utz Krug
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Bone marrow aspirate on the 14th day of induction treatment as a prognostic tool in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  V Liso; F Albano; D Pastore; P Carluccio; G Mele; M Lamacchia; A Mestice; G Specchia
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Randomized comparison of fixed-schedule versus response-oriented individualized induction therapy and use of ubenimex during and after consolidation therapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG GML200 Study.

Authors:  Atsushi Wakita; Shigeki Ohtake; Satoru Takada; Fumiharu Yagasaki; Hirokazu Komatsu; Yasushi Miyazaki; Kohmei Kubo; Yukihiko Kimura; Akihiro Takeshita; Yoko Adachi; Hitoshi Kiyoi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Minoru Yoshida; Kazunori Ohnishi; Shuichi Miyawaki; Tomoki Naoe; Ryuzo Ueda; Ryuzo Ohno
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Peter L Greenberg; John M Bennett; Bob Lowenberg; Pierre W Wijermans; Stephen D Nimer; Antonio Pinto; Miloslav Beran; Theo M de Witte; Richard M Stone; Moshe Mittelman; Guillermo F Sanz; Steven D Gore; Charles A Schiffer; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanfeng Liu; Pengcheng He; Feng Liu; Lili Shi; Huachao Zhu; Jing Zhao; Yuan Wang; Xiaoyan Cheng; Mei Zhang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  [Expert consensus on minimal residual disease detection of acute leukemia and plasma cell neoplasms by multi-parameter flow cytometry].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-12-14

2.  Comprehensive analysis for cellular senescence-related immunogenic characteristics and immunotherapy prediction of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Yan Mao; Jinwen Xu; Xuejiao Xu; Jiayun Qiu; Zhengyun Hu; Feng Jiang; Guoping Zhou
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.