Literature DB >> 26435038

Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the "3 + 7" induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.

Yishai Ofran1,2, Ronit Leiba3, Chezi Ganzel4, Revital Saban4, Moshe Gatt5, Ron Ram6, Ariela Arad7, Shlomo Bulvik7, Ilana Hellmann8, Sharon Gino-Moor9, Tsila Zuckerman1,2, Ron Hoffman1,2, Netanel Horowitz1,2, Noa Lavi1,2, Shimrit Ringelstein1,2, Israel Henig1, Michal Hayun1, Jacob M Rowe1,2,4.   

Abstract

Evaluation of early response during induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is used for prognostication and re-induction strategy, yet the optimal evaluation time point is unknown. Clearance of bone marrow (BM) blasts by day 14 of therapy does not ensure remission; thus, some patients requiring re-induction are neglected. This study aimed to examine the role of earlier BM evaluation during induction for predicting remission and overall survival. Results of BM testing on the 5th and 14th day of intensive induction were prospectively compared in 127 adult patients with AML. Re-induction was given, based on Day 14 results, to 25 patients. Reduction of the BM blast count to <5% as early as by the fifth day of induction was more specifically associated with the achievement of remission compared to Day 14 (88.2% vs. 60%, respectively). Rapid responders have a better 3-year overall survival (OS). Day 5 results are a stronger predictor of OS by multivariate analysis and better segregate long-term survivors than the Day 14th BM count (66% vs. 30%, P = 0.0001 and 48% vs. 37%, respectively, P = 0.04). The Day 5 evaluation of BM carries significant clinical information. The benefit of prescribing re-induction based on such early evaluation should be prospectively studied.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26435038     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  8 in total

1.  How many cycles of 7+3 and for whom?

Authors:  Y Ofran; J M Rowe
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Peripheral blood blast clearance is an independent prognostic factor for survival and response to acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Christopher B Benton; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Peng Qiu; Lisa Gu; Sherry Pierce; Mark Brandt; Abhishek Maiti; Taejin L Min; Kiran Naqvi; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Marina Konopleva; Tapan Kadia; Jorge Cortes; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Elias Jabbour; Hagop Kantarjian; Michael Andreeff
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Serum Flt3 ligand is a biomarker of progenitor cell mass and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Paul Milne; Charlotte Wilhelm-Benartzi; Michael R Grunwald; Venetia Bigley; Richard Dillon; Sylvie D Freeman; Kathleen Gallagher; Amy Publicover; Sarah Pagan; Helen Marr; Gail L Jones; Anne M Dickinson; Angela Grech; Alan K Burnett; Nigel H Russell; Mark Levis; Steven Knapper; Matthew Collin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-10-22

4.  Effect of measurable ('minimal') residual disease (MRD) information on prediction of relapse and survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  M Othus; B L Wood; D L Stirewalt; E H Estey; S H Petersdorf; F R Appelbaum; H P Erba; R B Walter
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  In-silico comparison of two induction regimens (7 + 3 vs 7 + 3 plus additional bone marrow evaluation) in acute myeloid leukemia treatment.

Authors:  Jan Christoph Banck; Dennis Görlich
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2019-01-31

6.  Early response evaluation in AML using mass cytometry.

Authors:  Bjørn T Gjertsen; Benedicte S Tislevoll; Oda H E Fagerholt; Monica Hellesøy
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2019-06-30

7.  Acute myeloid leukemia: negative prognostic impact of early blast persistence can be in part overcome by a later remission prior to post-induction therapy.

Authors:  Jana Ihlow; Sophia Gross; Leonie Busack; Anne Flörcken; Julia Jesse; Michaela Schwarz; Nina Rosa Neuendorff; Ann-Christin von Brünneck; Ioannis Anagnostopoulos; Seval Türkmen; Igor Wolfgang Blau; Thomas Burmeister; David Horst; Lars Bullinger; Jörg Westermann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.047

8.  Cytarabine delivered by CD44 and bone targeting redox-sensitive liposomes for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Yuan Gao; Jia Ma; Maosong Hu; Jing Xia; Shuting Bao; Yuxi Liu; Kai Feng
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-08-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.