Han Zhou1, Huaibing Liu2, Michael D Weir3, Mark A Reynolds3, Ke Zhang4, Hockin H K Xu5. 1. Department of Endodontics, Periodontics and Prosthodontics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. Restorative Business Unit, Dentsply Sirona, Milford, DE 19963, USA. 3. Department of Endodontics, Periodontics and Prosthodontics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. 4. Department of Endodontics, Periodontics and Prosthodontics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: tuzizhangke@163.com. 5. Department of Endodontics, Periodontics and Prosthodontics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Center for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD 21250, USA. Electronic address: hxu@umaryland.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tooth-restoration interfaces are the weak link with secondary caries causing restoration failure. The objectives of this study were to develop an antimicrobial bonding agent with dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM), and investigate the effects of quaternary amine charge density on three-dimensional (3D) biofilms on dental resin for the first time. METHODS: DMAHDM was synthesized and incorporated into Scotchbond Multi-Purpose bonding agent at mass fractions of 0% (control), 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%. Streptococcus mutans bacteria were inoculated on the polymerized resin and cultured for two days to form biofilms. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to measure biofilm thickness, live and dead biofilm volumes, and live bacteria percentage in 3D biofilm vs. distance from resin surface. RESULTS: Charge density of the resin had a significant effect on the antibacterial efficacy (p<0.05). Biofilms on control resin had the greatest thicknesses. Biofilm thickness and live biofilm volume decreased with increasing surface charge density (p<0.05). There were significant variations in bacterial viability along the 3D biofilm thickness (p<0.05). At 2.5% and 5% DMAHDM, the bacterial inhibition was the greatest on or near the resin surface, and the killing effect decreased away from the resin surface. At 10% DMAHDM, the entire 3D biofilm was dead and the percentage of live bacteria was nearly 0% throughout the biofilm thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Adding new antibacterial monomer DMAHDM into dental bonding agent yielded a strong antimicrobial activity, substantially decreasing the 3D biofilm thickness, live biofilm volume, and percentage of live bacteria on cross-sections through the biofilm thickness. SIGNIFICANCE: Novel DMAHDM-containing bonding agent with capability of inhibiting 3D biofilms is promising for a wide range of dental restorative and preventive applications to inhibit biofilms at the tooth-restoration margins and prevent secondary caries.
OBJECTIVES: Tooth-restoration interfaces are the weak link with secondary caries causing restoration failure. The objectives of this study were to develop an antimicrobial bonding agent with dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM), and investigate the effects of quaternary amine charge density on three-dimensional (3D) biofilms on dental resin for the first time. METHODS:DMAHDM was synthesized and incorporated into Scotchbond Multi-Purpose bonding agent at mass fractions of 0% (control), 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%. Streptococcus mutans bacteria were inoculated on the polymerized resin and cultured for two days to form biofilms. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to measure biofilm thickness, live and dead biofilm volumes, and live bacteria percentage in 3D biofilm vs. distance from resin surface. RESULTS: Charge density of the resin had a significant effect on the antibacterial efficacy (p<0.05). Biofilms on control resin had the greatest thicknesses. Biofilm thickness and live biofilm volume decreased with increasing surface charge density (p<0.05). There were significant variations in bacterial viability along the 3D biofilm thickness (p<0.05). At 2.5% and 5% DMAHDM, the bacterial inhibition was the greatest on or near the resin surface, and the killing effect decreased away from the resin surface. At 10% DMAHDM, the entire 3D biofilm was dead and the percentage of live bacteria was nearly 0% throughout the biofilm thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Adding new antibacterial monomer DMAHDM into dental bonding agent yielded a strong antimicrobial activity, substantially decreasing the 3D biofilm thickness, live biofilm volume, and percentage of live bacteria on cross-sections through the biofilm thickness. SIGNIFICANCE: Novel DMAHDM-containing bonding agent with capability of inhibiting 3D biofilms is promising for a wide range of dental restorative and preventive applications to inhibit biofilms at the tooth-restoration margins and prevent secondary caries.
Authors: C Robinson; J Kirkham; R Percival; R C Shore; W A Bonass; S J Brookes; L Kusa; H Nakagaki; K Kato; B Nattress Journal: Caries Res Date: 1997 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Han Zhou; Michael D Weir; Joseph M Antonucci; Gary E Schumacher; Xue-Dong Zhou; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Int J Oral Sci Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 6.344
Authors: L Cheng; K Zhang; N Zhang; M A S Melo; M D Weir; X D Zhou; Y X Bai; M A Reynolds; H H K Xu Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Yuncong Li; Xiaoyi Hu; Yang Xia; Yadong Ji; Jianping Ruan; Michael D Weir; Xiaoying Lin; Zhihong Nie; Ning Gu; Radi Masri; Xiaofeng Chang; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Mary Anne S Melo; Michael D Weir; Vanara F Passos; Juliana P M Rolim; Christopher D Lynch; Lidiany K A Rodrigues; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Faisal Al-Qarni; Michael Weir; Mary A Melo; Yousif Al-Dulaijan; Khalid S Almulhim; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Ke Zhang; Bashayer Baras; Christopher D Lynch; Michael D Weir; Mary Anne S Melo; Yuncong Li; Mark A Reynolds; Yuxing Bai; Lin Wang; Suping Wang; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 3.623