Literature DB >> 34110495

Novel calcium phosphate ion-rechargeable and antibacterial adhesive to inhibit dental caries.

Faisal Al-Qarni1, Michael Weir2, Mary A Melo2, Yousif Al-Dulaijan1, Khalid S Almulhim3, Hockin H K Xu2,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop an antibacterial and calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) rechargeable adhesive and investigate the effects of dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM) and nanoparticles of amorphous calcium phosphate (NACP) on dentin bonding, biofilm response, and repeated Ca and P ion recharge and re-release capability for the first time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pyromellitic glycerol dimethacrylate (PMGDM), ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate (EBPADMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and bisphenol A glycidyl dimethacrylate (BisGMA) formed the adhesive (PEHB). Three groups were tested: (1) Scotchbond (SBMP, 3 M) control, (2) PEHB + 30% NACP, and (3) PEHB + 30% NACP + 5% DMAHDM. Specimens were tested for dentin shear bond strength, and Ca and P ion release, recharge, and re-release. Biofilm lactic acid production and colony-forming units (CFU) on resins were analyzed.
RESULTS: The four groups had similar dentin shear bond strengths (p > 0.1). Adhesive with DMAHDM showed significant decrease in metabolic activity, lactic acid production, and biofilm CFU (p < 0.05). The adhesives containing NACP released high levels of Ca and P ions initially and after being recharged.
CONCLUSION: This study developed the first Ca and P ion-rechargeable and antibacterial adhesive, achieving strong antibacterial activity and Ca and P ion recharge and re-release for long-term remineralization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the restoration-tooth bonded interface being the weak link and recurrent caries at the margins being the primary reason for restoration failures, this novel calcium phosphate-rechargeable and antibacterial adhesive is promising for a wide range of tooth-restoration applications to inhibit caries.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-biofilm; Calcium phosphate nanoparticles; Dental adhesive; Dentin bonding; Ion recharge; Secondary caries

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34110495     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  62 in total

1.  Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation.

Authors:  B-S Lim; J L Ferracane; R L Sakaguchi; J R Condon
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods development.

Authors:  D C Watts; A S Marouf; A M Al-Hindi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Resin composite--state of the art.

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 4.  Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks.

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges.

Authors:  Yasaman Delaviz; Yoav Finer; J Paul Santerre
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.

Authors:  Niek J M Opdam; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Joost M Roeters; Bas A C Loomans
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 7.  Proteins, pathogens, and failure at the composite-tooth interface.

Authors:  P Spencer; Q Ye; A Misra; S E P Goncalves; J S Laurence
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles.

Authors:  Yong-jie Wei; Nick Silikas; Zhen-ting Zhang; David C Watts
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.

Authors:  M B Correa; M A Peres; K G Peres; B L Horta; A D Barros; F F Demarco
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials.

Authors:  J L Drummond
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.