Karl Miller1, R Turró2, J W Greve3, C M Bakker3, J N Buchwald4, J C Espinós2. 1. Bariatric Medical Unit, Wehrle Diakonissen Private Clinic, Salzburg, Austria. karl@miller.co.at. 2. Unidad de Endoscopia, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. 3. Department of General Surgery, Bariatric and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands. 4. Division of Scientific Research Writing, Medwrite Medical Communications, Maiden Rock, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pose SM is an endolumenal weight-loss intervention in which suture anchors are placed endoscopically in the gastric fundus/distal gastric body. Observational studies of pose have shown safe, effective weight loss. Twelve-month results of a randomized controlled trial comparing weight loss and satiety after pose vs. conventional medical therapy are reported. METHODS:Subjects with classesI-II obesity were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to pose or diet/exercise guidance only (control). Pose subjects received gastric fundus and distal body suture-anchor plications with diet/exercise counseling. Total body (%TBWL) and excess weight loss (%EWL) were assessed at 6 and 12 months. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze 12-month %TBWL. Satiety changes were assessed at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS:From November 2013 to July 2014, 44 subjects were randomized (34, 77.3 % female; mean age, 38.3 ± 10.7 years; body mass index, 36.5 ± 3.4 kg/m2) to pose (n = 34) or control (n = 10) groups in three centers. Mean pose procedure time was 51.8 ± 14.5 min; pose subjects received a mean 8.8 ± 1.3 fundal and 4.2 ± 0.7 distal body plications. Twelve-month TBWL: pose, 13.0 % (EWL, 45.0 %), n = 30 vs. control group, 5.3 % (18.1 %), n = 9; significant mean difference, 7.7 % (95 % CI 2.2, 13.2; p < 0.01). Pose subjects showed significant reductions in satiety parameters (p < 0.001); controls experienced reduced caloric intake and satiety volume (p < 0.05). No serious device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial at 12 months, pose-treated subjects had significantly greater weight loss than those treated with diet/exercise guidance alone. At 6 and 12 months, pose subjects showed significant reduction in satiety parameters. STUDY REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier # NCT01843231.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pose SM is an endolumenal weight-loss intervention in which suture anchors are placed endoscopically in the gastric fundus/distal gastric body. Observational studies of pose have shown safe, effective weight loss. Twelve-month results of a randomized controlled trial comparing weight loss and satiety after pose vs. conventional medical therapy are reported. METHODS: Subjects with classes I-II obesity were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to pose or diet/exercise guidance only (control). Pose subjects received gastric fundus and distal body suture-anchor plications with diet/exercise counseling. Total body (%TBWL) and excess weight loss (%EWL) were assessed at 6 and 12 months. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze 12-month %TBWL. Satiety changes were assessed at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: From November 2013 to July 2014, 44 subjects were randomized (34, 77.3 % female; mean age, 38.3 ± 10.7 years; body mass index, 36.5 ± 3.4 kg/m2) to pose (n = 34) or control (n = 10) groups in three centers. Mean pose procedure time was 51.8 ± 14.5 min; pose subjects received a mean 8.8 ± 1.3 fundal and 4.2 ± 0.7 distal body plications. Twelve-month TBWL: pose, 13.0 % (EWL, 45.0 %), n = 30 vs. control group, 5.3 % (18.1 %), n = 9; significant mean difference, 7.7 % (95 % CI 2.2, 13.2; p < 0.01). Pose subjects showed significant reductions in satiety parameters (p < 0.001); controls experienced reduced caloric intake and satiety volume (p < 0.05). No serious device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial at 12 months, pose-treated subjects had significantly greater weight loss than those treated with diet/exercise guidance alone. At 6 and 12 months, pose subjects showed significant reduction in satiety parameters. STUDY REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier # NCT01843231.
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anne C Meyer-Gerspach; Bettina Wölnerhanssen; Bettina Beglinger; Falk Nessenius; Marylin Napitupulu; Felix H Schulte; Robert E Steinert; Christoph Beglinger Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2014-02-28
Authors: J C Espinós; R Turró; G Moragas; A Bronstone; J N Buchwald; F Mearin; A Mata; H Uchima; J Turró; S Delgado-Aros Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Pierre-Yves Cremieux; Henry Buchwald; Scott A Shikora; Arindam Ghosh; Haixia Elaine Yang; Marric Buessing Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Ben Gys; Philip Plaeke; Bas Lamme; Thierry Lafullarde; Niels Komen; Anthony Beunis; Guy Hubens Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Alia Hadefi; Marianna Arvanitakis; Vincent Huberty; Jacques Devière Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 4.623