Literature DB >> 27468198

Impact of biliary stent-related events in patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatobiliary tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy.

Angela Lamarca1, Christina Rigby1, Mairéad G McNamara1, Richard A Hubner1, Juan W Valle1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the impact (morbidity/mortality) of biliary stent-related events (SRE) (cholangitis or stent obstruction) in chemotherapy-treated pancreatico-biliary patients.
METHODS: All consecutive patients with advanced pancreatobiliary cancer and a biliary stent in-situ prior to starting palliative chemotherapy were identified retrospectively from local electronic case-note records (Jan 13 to Jan 15). The primary end-point was SRE rate and the time-to-SRE (defined as time from first stenting before chemotherapy to date of SRE). Progression-free survival and overall survival were measured from the time of starting chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier, Cox and Fine-Gray regression (univariate and multivariable) analyses were employed, as appropriate. For the analysis of time-to-SRE, death was considered as a competing event.
RESULTS: Ninety-six out of 693 screened patients were eligible; 89% had a metal stent (the remainder were plastic). The median time of follow-up was 9.6 mo (range 2.2 to 26.4). Forty-one patients (43%) developed a SRE during follow-up [cholangitis (39%), stent obstruction (29%), both (32%)]. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the SRE group and no-SRE groups. Recorded SRE-consequences were: none (37%), chemotherapy delay (24%), discontinuation (17%) and death (22%). The median time-to-SRE was 4.4 mo (95%CI: 3.6-5.5). Patients with severe comorbidities (P < 0.001) and patients with ≥ 2 baseline stents/biliary procedures [HR = 2.3 (95%CI: 1.2-4.44), P = 0.010] had a shorter time-to-SRE on multivariable analysis. Stage was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.029) in the multivariable analysis adjusted for primary tumour site, performance status and development of SRE (SRE group vs no-SRE group).
CONCLUSION: SREs are common and impact on patient's morbidity. Our results highlight the need for prospective studies exploring the role of prophylactic strategies to prevent/delay SREs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced biliary tract cancer; Biliary obstruction; Biliary stent; Pancreatic cancer; Stent-related event

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27468198      PMCID: PMC4948275          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.6065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  31 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Prevention of clogging of biliary stents by administration of levofloxacin and ursodeoxycholic acid].

Authors:  Carmelo Sciumè; Girolamo Geraci; Franco Pisello; Tiziana Facella; Francesco Li Volsi; Giuseppe Modica
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

3.  Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jimin Han; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Cheol Koo; Jee Heon Kang; Joon Hyuck Choi; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Ho Gak Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid and endoscopic sphincterotomy in long-term stenting for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Toshihiro Nishizawa; Hidekazu Suzuki; Masahiko Takahashi; Hiroshi Kaneko; Masayuki Suzuki; Toshifumi Hibi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial.

Authors:  G Costamagna; M Mutignani; G Rotondano; L Cipolletta; L Ghezzo; A Foco; A Zambelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Prevention of biliary stent occlusion using cyclical antibiotics and ursodeoxycholic acid.

Authors:  S Ghosh; K R Palmer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Advances in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  J W Valle
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  P H Davids; A K Groen; E A Rauws; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  How to Choose Between Percutaneous Transhepatic and Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Obstructive Jaundice: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Rizzo; Angela Dalia Ricci; Giorgio Frega; Andrea Palloni; Stefania DE Lorenzo; Francesca Abbati; Veronica Mollica; Simona Tavolari; Mariacristina DI Marco; Giovanni Brandi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-interventional treatment with stents.

Authors:  Alexander Waldthaler; Wiktor Rutkowski; Roberto Valente; Urban Arnelo; J-Matthias Löhr
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-31

3.  Is Palliative Percutaneous Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction Useful?

Authors:  Jarmo Niemelä; Raija Kallio; Pasi Ohtonen; Jukka Perälä; Juha Saarnio; Hannu Syrjälä
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Risk Factors for the Development of Stent-Associated Cholangitis Following Endoscopic Biliary Stent Placement.

Authors:  Brendan T Everett; Shelly Naud; Richard S Zubarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Use of Machine-Learning Algorithms in Intensified Preoperative Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer to Predict Individual Risk of Relapse.

Authors:  Pablo Sala Elarre; Esther Oyaga-Iriarte; Kenneth H Yu; Vicky Baudin; Leire Arbea Moreno; Omar Carranza; Ana Chopitea Ortega; Mariano Ponz-Sarvise; Luis D Mejías Sosa; Fernando Rotellar Sastre; Blanca Larrea Leoz; Yohana Iragorri Barberena; Jose C Subtil Iñigo; Alberto Benito Boíllos; Fernando Pardo; Javier Rodríguez Rodríguez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Imaging of abdominal and pelvic infections in the cancer patient.

Authors:  Malak Itani; Christine O Menias; Vincent M Mellnick; Aline El Zakhem; Khaled Elsayes; Venkata Katabathina; Margarita V Revzin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01-02

7.  Use of self-expandable metallic stents for endoscopic biliary decompression decreases stent complications in pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sini Vehviläinen; Hanna Seppänen; Anna Nurmi; Caj Haglund; Harri Mustonen; Marianne Udd; Leena Kylänpää
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.