| Literature DB >> 27467559 |
L Z Wang1,2, M L Zhou1, J W Wang1, D Wu1, T Yan1,2.
Abstract
Twenty castrated Boer crossbred goats were used in the present study with two treatments to examine the effect of dietary replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on nutrient utilization, enteric methane emission and ruminal archaea structure and composition. Two treatment diets contained (DM basis) 70.0% of forage, 21.8% of concentrates and 8.2% of either ordinary rice (control) or red yeast rice (RYR). Nutrient utilization was measured and enteric methane emissions were determined in respiration chambers. Results showed that RYR had significantly lower digestibility of N and organic matter compared to control group. However, feeding red yeast rice did not affect N retention as g/d or a proportion of N intake, and reduced heat production as MJ/d or as a proportion of metabolizable energy intake, thus leading to a higher proportion of metabolizable energy intake to be retained in body tissue. RYR also had significantly lower methane emissions either as g/d, or as a proportion of feed intake. Although feeding red yeast rice had no negative effect on any rumen fermentation variables, it decreased serum contents of total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol. In the present study, 75616 archaeal sequences were generated and clustered into 2364 Operational Taxonomic Units. At the genus level, the predominant archaea in the rumen of goats was Methanobrevibacter, which was significantly inhibited with the supplementation of red yeast rice. In conclusion, red yeast rice is a potential feed ingredient for mitigation of enteric methane emissions of goats. However, caution should be taken when it is used because it may inhibit the digestibility of some nutrients. Further studies are required to evaluate its potential with different diets and animal species, as well as its effects on animal health and food safety.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27467559 PMCID: PMC4965012 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The ingredient composition and chemical contents of diets.
| CT | RYR | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredient composition (%, DM basis) | ||
| Alfalfa meal | 34.8 | 34.8 |
| Rice straw | 35.2 | 35.2 |
| Corn | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Ordinary rice | 8.2 | 0 |
| Red yeast rice | 0 | 8.2 |
| Soybean meal | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Wheat bran | 12.4 | 12.4 |
| Premix | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Salt | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Chemical contents (%, DM basis) | ||
| Metabolizable energy | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Crude protein | 10.9 | 11.0 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 49.4 | 48.6 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 29.4 | 29.0 |
| Calcium | 0.99 | 1.04 |
| Phosphorus | 0.33 | 0.35 |
aPremix provides: Ca (as calcium carbonate) 1.5 g/kg DM; Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 30 mg/kg DM; Cu (as copper sulfate) 10 mg/kg DM; Zn (as zinc sulfate) 50 mg/kg DM; Mn (as manganese sulfate) 60 mg/kg DM; Vitamin A 2937 IU/kg DM; Vitamin D 343 IU/kg DM; Vitamin E 30 IU/kg DM.
bMetabolizable energy was calculated using gross energy intake minus energy excretions from feces, urine and methane and then divided by DM intake, with all data measured in metabolizable cages and calorimeter chambers.
The effect of replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on DM intake and apparent nutrient digestibility in goats (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter intake (kg/d) | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.01 | 0.439 |
| Average daily body weight gain (kg/d) | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.775 |
| Nutrient digestibility (%) | ||||
| Dry matter | 58.1 | 57.2 | 0.42 | 0.067 |
| Organic matter | 61.3 | 56.1 | 0.50 | 0.002 |
| Nitrogen | 66.4 | 61.7 | 0.55 | <0.001 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 57.2 | 58.3 | 1.93 | 0.574 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 48.1 | 43.4 | 5.25 | 0.400 |
The effect of replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on N metabolism in goats (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen intake and output (g/d) | ||||
| Nitrogen intake (NI) | 19.1 | 19.3 | 0.12 | 0.709 |
| Fecal nitrogen (FN) | 6.4 | 7.4 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
| Urine nitrogen (UN) | 7.8 | 8.1 | 0.49 | 0.580 |
| Retention nitrogen (RN) | 4.9 | 3.8 | 0.51 | 0.071 |
| Nitrogen utilization (%) | ||||
| FN/NI | 33.6 | 38.3 | 0.01 | <0.001 |
| UN/NI | 40.7 | 41.9 | 0.03 | 0.621 |
| RN/NI | 25.6 | 19.8 | 2.89 | 0.061 |
The effect of replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on energy metabolism in goats (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy intake and output (MJ/d) | ||||
| Gross energy intake (GE) | 18.2 | 18.3 | 0.12 | 0.763 |
| Fecal energy (FE) | 7.4 | 7.9 | 0.10 | 0.001 |
| Urine energy (UE) | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.03 | 0.606 |
| CH4 energy | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.02 | <0.001 |
| Heat production (HP) | 6.1 | 4.9 | 0.13 | <0.001 |
| Digestible energy (DE) intake | 10.8 | 10.4 | 0.13 | 0.007 |
| Metabolizable energy (ME) intake | 9.1 | 8.7 | 0.14 | 0.047 |
| Retained energy (RE) | 3.0 | 3.8 | 0.15 | <0.001 |
| Energy utilization (%) | ||||
| DE/GE | 59.5 | 57.0 | 0.52 | 0.001 |
| ME/GE | 49.7 | 47.9 | 0.63 | 0.018 |
| ME/DE | 83.6 | 84.0 | 0.44 | 0.310 |
| HP/ME | 67.4 | 56.4 | 1.46 | <0.001 |
| RE/ME | 32.7 | 43.6 | 1.46 | <0.001 |
The effect of replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on enteric methane emission in goats (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH4 (g/d) | 21.9 | 19.9 | 0.27 | <0.001 |
| CH4/Dry matter intake (g/kg) | 20.3 | 18.3 | 0.29 | <0.001 |
| CH4/Organic matter intake (g/kg) | 21.4 | 19.4 | 0.34 | 0.001 |
| CH4 energy /Gross energy (%) | 7.2 | 6.5 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
| CH4 energy /Digestible energy (%) | 12.2 | 11.4 | 0.21 | 0.004 |
| CH4 energy /Metabolizable energy (%) | 14.6 | 13.5 | 0.30 | 0.008 |
The effect of replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on serum lipids and rumen fermentation in goats (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum variables (mmol/L) | ||||
| Total cholesterol | 1.77 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.019 |
| Triglycerides | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.026 |
| HDL- Cholesterol | 0.96 | 0.66 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| LDL- Cholesterol | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.02 | <0.001 |
| Rumen fermentation variables (mmol/L) | ||||
| Total short chain fatty acid | 87.9 | 72.5 | 9.83 | 0.151 |
| Acetic acid | 68.4 | 55.1 | 7.20 | 0.102 |
| Propionic acid | 12.2 | 11.3 | 1.82 | 0.638 |
| Butyric acid | 7.2 | 6.0 | 1.00 | 0.253 |
| Ammonia-N | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.44 | 0.952 |
| Acetic/propionic acid | 5.8 | 4.9 | 0.25 | 0.008 |
Fig 1Venn plot showing the shared and unique Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) found in RYR group and CT group (n = 20).
The effect of replacement of ordinary rice with red yeast rice on alpha diversity of archaeal communities at a depth of 720 sequences in goats (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chao1 | 141.7 | 146.7 | 13.6 | 0.722 |
| Observed species | 84.3 | 95.8 | 8.6 | 0.218 |
| Shannon-Wiener | 4.0 | 5.1 | 0.45 | 0.035 |
The comparison of archaeal abundances from level phylum to level genus in goat rumen between RYR group and CT group (% of sequences) (n = 20).
| CT | RYR | SED | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | ||||
| | 4.0 | 19.4 | 3.62 | 0.002 |
| | 95.8 | 78.7 | 4.11 | 0.002 |
| Unclassified Archaea | 0.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.025 |
| Class | ||||
| | 4.0 | 19.4 | 3.62 | 0.002 |
| | 64.0 | 32.6 | 4.42 | <0.001 |
| | 2.7 | 8.5 | 2.00 | 0.017 |
| Order | ||||
| Unclassified | 3.9 | 19.1 | 3.61 | 0.002 |
| | 64.0 | 32.6 | 4.42 | <0.001 |
| | 2.1 | 8.2 | 2.04 | 0.015 |
| Family | ||||
| | 64.0 | 32.6 | 4.42 | <0.001 |
| | 2.1 | 8.1 | 2.02 | 0.015 |
| Unclassified | 3.6 | 7.8 | 1.60 | 0.026 |
| Genus | ||||
| | 63.8 | 32.3 | 4.49 | <0.001 |
| Unclassified | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.04 | 0.007 |
| | 2.1 | 8.1 | 2.02 | 0.015 |
aOnly the taxa that were significantly different (P < 0.05) between treatments were presented.
Fig 2Principal Co-ordinate Analysis (PCoA) of archaeal Operational Taxonomic Units from goat rumen fluid.
The archaeal genera shared by CT group (n = 10), RYR group (n = 10) and all goats (n = 20) and their abundance (Means ± SD, % of sequences).
| Genus | CT | RYR | All animals |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Order) Unclassified | 3.9±2.8 | 19.1±11.8 | 11.5±11.4 |
| 63.8±15.7 | 32.4±15.3 | 48.05±22.1 | |
| 0.1±0.1 | / | / | |
| 2.1±1.7 | 8.1±6.4 | 5.1±5.5 | |
| 0.6±0.9 | / | / | |
| (Family)Unclassified | 5.5±7.4 | 3.5±3.8 | 4.5±5.8 |
| 17.6±9.2 | 23.3±12.9 | 20.5±11.3 | |
| (Family)unclassified | 3.6±4.1 | 7.8±5.9 | 5.7±5.4 |
| (Class)unclassified | 2.4±1.5 | 3.0±3.8 | 2.7±2.8 |
| (phylum)unclassified Archaea | / | 1.9±2.2 | / |
aTaxa that could not be assigned to a genus but still shared by the samples were displayed using the highest taxonomic level that could be assigned to them and the level is shown in parentheses.
b “/”means this item did not exist in this column.