Carisa Harris-Adamson1, Ellen A Eisen2, Andreas Neophytou2, Jay Kapellusch3, Arun Garg3, Kurt T Hegmann4, Matthew S Thiese4, Ann Marie Dale5, Bradley Evanoff5, Stephen Bao6, Barbara Silverstein6, Fred Gerr7, Susan Burt8, David Rempel9. 1. Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. 3. Center for Ergonomics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. 4. Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (RMCOEH), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 5. Division of General Medical Science, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. 6. Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, Olympia, Washington, USA. 7. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 8. formerly with National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 9. Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Between 2001 and 2010, six research groups conducted coordinated prospective studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) incidence among US workers from various industries to estimate exposure-response relationships. OBJECTIVE: This analysis examined the presence and magnitude of confounding between biomechanical and workplace psychosocial factors and incidence of dominant-hand CTS. METHODS: 1605 participants, without CTS at enrolment, were followed for up to 3.5 years (2471 person-years). Demographic information, medical history and workplace psychosocial stress measures were collected at baseline. Individual workplace biomechanical exposures were collected for each task and combined across the workweek using time-weighted averaging (TWA). CTS case criteria were based on symptoms and results of electrophysiological testing. HRs were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models. Confounding was assessed using causal diagrams and an empirical criterion of 10% or greater change in effect estimate magnitude. RESULTS: There were 109 incident CTS cases (IR=4.41/100 person-years; 6.7% cumulative incidence). The relationships between CTS and forceful repetition rate, % time forceful hand exertion and the Threshold Limit Value for Hand Activity Level (TLV-HAL) were slightly confounded by decision latitude with effect estimates being attenuated towards the null (10-14% change) after adjustment. The risk of CTS among participants reporting high job strain was attenuated towards the null by 14% after adjusting for the HAL Scale or the % time forceful hand exertions. CONCLUSIONS: Although attenuation of the relationships between CTS and some biomechanical and work psychosocial exposures was observed after adjusting for confounding, the magnitudes were small and confirmed biomechanical and work psychosocial exposures as independent risk factors for incident CTS. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Between 2001 and 2010, six research groups conducted coordinated prospective studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) incidence among US workers from various industries to estimate exposure-response relationships. OBJECTIVE: This analysis examined the presence and magnitude of confounding between biomechanical and workplace psychosocial factors and incidence of dominant-hand CTS. METHODS: 1605 participants, without CTS at enrolment, were followed for up to 3.5 years (2471 person-years). Demographic information, medical history and workplace psychosocial stress measures were collected at baseline. Individual workplace biomechanical exposures were collected for each task and combined across the workweek using time-weighted averaging (TWA). CTS case criteria were based on symptoms and results of electrophysiological testing. HRs were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models. Confounding was assessed using causal diagrams and an empirical criterion of 10% or greater change in effect estimate magnitude. RESULTS: There were 109 incident CTS cases (IR=4.41/100 person-years; 6.7% cumulative incidence). The relationships between CTS and forceful repetition rate, % time forceful hand exertion and the Threshold Limit Value for Hand Activity Level (TLV-HAL) were slightly confounded by decision latitude with effect estimates being attenuated towards the null (10-14% change) after adjustment. The risk of CTS among participants reporting high job strain was attenuated towards the null by 14% after adjusting for the HAL Scale or the % time forceful hand exertions. CONCLUSIONS: Although attenuation of the relationships between CTS and some biomechanical and work psychosocial exposures was observed after adjusting for confounding, the magnitudes were small and confirmed biomechanical and work psychosocial exposures as independent risk factors for incident CTS. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Francesco S Violante; Thomas J Armstrong; Cristiana Fiorentini; Francesca Graziosi; Alessandro Risi; Silvia Venturi; Stefania Curti; Francesca Zanardi; Robin M T Cooke; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Stefano Mattioli Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Carisa Harris-Adamson; David Rempel; Fred Gerr; Kurt Hegmann; Barbara Silverstein; Susan Burt; Arun Garg; Jay Kapellusch; Linda Merlino; Matthew S Thiese; Ellen A Eisen; Bradley Evanoff Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Jay M Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Stephen S Bao; Barbara A Silverstein; Susan E Burt; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff; Frederic E Gerr; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Kurt T Hegmann; Linda A Merlino; David M Rempel Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Carisa Harris-Adamson; Ellen A Eisen; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley Evanoff; Kurt T Hegmann; Matthew S Thiese; Jay M Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Susan Burt; Stephen Bao; Barbara Silverstein; Fred Gerr; Linda Merlino; David Rempel Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Amilcar Cardona; Matthew S Thiese; Jay Kapellusch; Andrew Merryweather; Eric Wood; Kurt T Hegmann Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Jennie A Jackson; David Olsson; Alex Burdorf; Laura Punnett; Bengt Järvholm; Jens Wahlström Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Valentina Scalise; Fabrizio Brindisino; Leonardo Pellicciari; Silvia Minnucci; Francesca Bonetti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Eva Tekavec; Lotta Löfqvist; Anna Larsson; Karin Fisk; Jakob Riddar; Tohr Nilsson; Catarina Nordander Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Aboubakari Nambiema; Julie Bodin; Susan Stock; Agnès Aublet-Cuvelier; Alexis Descatha; Bradley Evanoff; Yves Roquelaure Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Victor Ei-Wen Lo; Yi-Chen Chiu; Hsin-Hung Tu; Chien-Wei Liu; Chi-Yuang Yu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390