OBJECTIVES: Most studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) incidence and prevalence among workers have been limited by small sample sizes or restricted to a small subset of jobs. We established a common CTS case definition and then pooled CTS prevalence and incidence data across six prospective studies of musculoskeletal outcomes to measure CTS frequency and allow better studies of etiology. METHODS: Six research groups collected prospective data at > 50 workplaces including symptoms characteristic of CTS and electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) of the median and ulnar nerves across the dominant wrist. While study designs and the timing of data collection varied across groups, we were able to create a common CTS case definition incorporating both symptoms and EDS results from data that were collected in all studies. RESULTS: At the time of enrollment, 7.8% of 4321 subjects met our case definition and were considered prevalent cases of CTS. During 8833 person-years of follow-up, an additional 204 subjects met the CTS case definition for an overall incidence rate of 2.3 CTS cases per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Both prevalent and incident CTS were common in data pooled across multiple studies and sites. The large number of incident cases in this prospective study provides adequate power for future exposure-response analyses to identify work- and non-work-related risk factors for CTS. The prospective nature allows determination of the temporal relations necessary for causal inference.
OBJECTIVES: Most studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) incidence and prevalence among workers have been limited by small sample sizes or restricted to a small subset of jobs. We established a common CTS case definition and then pooled CTS prevalence and incidence data across six prospective studies of musculoskeletal outcomes to measure CTS frequency and allow better studies of etiology. METHODS: Six research groups collected prospective data at > 50 workplaces including symptoms characteristic of CTS and electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) of the median and ulnar nerves across the dominant wrist. While study designs and the timing of data collection varied across groups, we were able to create a common CTS case definition incorporating both symptoms and EDS results from data that were collected in all studies. RESULTS: At the time of enrollment, 7.8% of 4321 subjects met our case definition and were considered prevalent cases of CTS. During 8833 person-years of follow-up, an additional 204 subjects met the CTS case definition for an overall incidence rate of 2.3 CTS cases per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Both prevalent and incident CTS were common in data pooled across multiple studies and sites. The large number of incident cases in this prospective study provides adequate power for future exposure-response analyses to identify work- and non-work-related risk factors for CTS. The prospective nature allows determination of the temporal relations necessary for causal inference.
Authors: Robert A Werner; Alfred Franzblau; Nancy Gell; Anne G Hartigan; Marissa Ebersole; Thomas J Armstrong Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Lucia Isolani; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Giovanni B Raffi; Francesco S Violante Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2002-01-30 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Fredric Gerr; Michele Marcus; Cindy Ensor; David Kleinbaum; Susan Cohen; Alicia Edwards; Eileen Gentry; Daniel J Ortiz; Carolyn Monteilh Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Roberta Bonfiglioli; Stefano Mattioli; Cristiana Fiorentini; Francesca Graziosi; Stefania Curti; Francesco S Violante Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2006-07-25 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Teryl Nuckols; Craig Conlon; Michael Robbins; Michael Dworsky; Julie Lai; Carol P Roth; Barbara Levitan; Seth Seabury; Rachana Seelam; Steven M Asch Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Jay M Kapellusch; Frederic E Gerr; Elizabeth J Malloy; Arun Garg; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Stephen S Bao; Susan E Burt; Ann Marie Dale; Ellen A Eisen; Bradley A Evanoff; Kurt T Hegmann; Barbara A Silverstein; Matthew S Theise; David M Rempel Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Angelique Zeringue; Carisa Harris-Adamson; David Rempel; Stephen Bao; Matthew S Thiese; Linda Merlino; Susan Burt; Jay Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Fred Gerr; Kurt T Hegmann; Ellen A Eisen; Bradley Evanoff Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: David Rempel; Fred Gerr; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Kurt T Hegmann; Matthew S Thiese; Jay Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Susan Burt; Stephen Bao; Barbara Silverstein; Linda Merlino; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley Evanoff Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Kevin W Park; Martin I Boyer; Richard H Gelberman; Ryan P Calfee; Jeffrey G Stepan; Daniel A Osei Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.020