Literature DB >> 27466264

Abbreviated Steady State Intervals for Measuring Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Laura A Olejnik1, Emily N Peters1, J Scott Parrott1, Andrea F Marcus1, Rebecca A Brody1, Rosa K Hand2, Justin J Fiutem2, Laura D Byham-Gray1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry requires a steady state (SS) protocol to determine measured resting energy expenditure (mREE). Achieving stringent criteria for an SS interval may be difficult for patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD), as they may become uncomfortable because of the test itself or their health status. The study aim was to explore if a shortened SS interval was within acceptable limits for bias and precision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this cross-sectional secondary analysis, adults (N = 125) who received MHD thrice weekly were enrolled. The indirect calorimetry test was performed for a length of total time ≤30 consecutive minutes. SS was evaluated in accordance with intervals of 10, 5, 4, 3, and 2 minutes. The mREE at the 10-minute SS was compared with the mREE at 5, 4, 3, and 2 minutes, via t tests and Bland-Altman analysis, to determine degree of bias and level of agreement. The a priori alpha level was set at ≤0.5.
RESULTS: The sample was primarily male, African American, and non-Hispanic, with a mean ± SD age of 55.4 ± 12.2 years, who reported being on MHD for an average of 62.4 ± 74.3 months. None of the mREE measures were significantly different from that of the 10-minute SS interval. Seventy-two percent of the participants were able to achieve SS at the 10-minute interval, 83.2% at 5 minutes, 87.2% at 4 minutes, and 89.6% for both 3 and 2 minutes.
CONCLUSION: For patients on MHD, an abbreviated SS interval of <10 minutes (eg, 5 minutes) yielded valid mREE measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; calorimetry; life cycle; nutrition; nutrition assessment; renal disease; research and diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27466264      PMCID: PMC5272914          DOI: 10.1177/0148607116660981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  25 in total

1.  Mortality risk in hemodialysis patients and changes in nutritional indicators: DOPPS.

Authors:  Trinh B Pifer; Keith P McCullough; Friedrich K Port; David A Goodkin; Bradley J Maroni; Philip J Held; Eric W Young
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Reducing the time period of steady state does not affect the accuracy of energy expenditure measurements by indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Marina M Reeves; Peter S W Davies; Judith Bauer; Diana Battistutta
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-03-12

3.  On heat, respiration, and calorimetry.

Authors:  David C Frankenfield
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 4.  Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlene Compher; David Frankenfield; Nancy Keim; Lori Roth-Yousey
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-06

5.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures.

Authors:  P S Myles; J Cui
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Validity Test of a New Open-Circuit Indirect Calorimeter.

Authors:  Christine M Ashcraft; David C Frankenfield
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Increased energy expenditure in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  T A Ikizler; R L Wingard; M Sun; J Harvell; R A Parker; R M Hakim
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 8.  Etiology of the protein-energy wasting syndrome in chronic kidney disease: a consensus statement from the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM).

Authors:  Juan Jesús Carrero; Peter Stenvinkel; Lilian Cuppari; T Alp Ikizler; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; George Kaysen; William E Mitch; S Russ Price; Christoph Wanner; Angela Y M Wang; Pieter ter Wee; Harold A Franch
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.655

9.  Achievement of steady state optimizes results when performing indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; David A Spain; Judah L Skolnick; Cynthia C Lowen; Melissa J Kieber; Patrice S Wickerham; Janet R Vogt; Stephen W Looney
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Increased resting energy expenditure in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Roxanna Neyra; Kong Y Chen; Ming Sun; Yu Shyr; Raymond M Hakim; T Alp Ikizler
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modeling a Predictive Energy Equation Specific for Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Laura D Byham-Gray; J Scott Parrott; Emily N Peters; Susan Gould Fogerite; Rosa K Hand; Sean Ahrens; Andrea Fleisch Marcus; Justin J Fiutem
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Comparison of Subjective Global Assessment and Protein Energy Wasting Score to Nutrition Evaluations Conducted by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in Identifying Protein Energy Wasting Risk in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Simon Siu-Man Sum; Andrea F Marcus; Debra Blair; Laura A Olejnik; Joyce Cao; J Scott Parrott; Emily N Peters; Rosa K Hand; Laura D Byham-Gray
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.655

3.  Energy Expenditure and Shivering Severity During Targeted Temperature Management at 36°C After Cardiac Arrest: A Case Series.

Authors:  Makayla Cordoza; Lingtak-Neander Chan; Elizabeth Bridges; David J Carlbom; Hilaire Thompson
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Q       Date:  2020 Jul/Sep

4.  Current methods for developing predictive energy equations in maintenance dialysis are imprecise.

Authors:  Alainn Bailey; Rebecca Brody; Joachim Sackey; J Scott Parrott; Emily Peters; Laura Byham-Gray
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.