Literature DB >> 28525471

Cervical Disk Replacement With Discover Versus Fusion in a Single-Level Cervical Disk Disease: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Trial With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Marjan Rožanković1, Sergej M Marasanov, Miroslav Vukić.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome after Discover arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients treated for symptomatic single-level cervical disk disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is still the gold standard for surgical treatment of cervical spine degenerative disk disease. However, results of many studies suggest that it may cause degenerative changes at levels immediately above and below the fusion, known as adjacent segment degenerative disease. Cervical arthroplasty has recently been introduced as an alternative to standard procedure of ACDF. It showed decreased surgical morbidity, decreased complications from postoperative immobilization, and an earlier return to previous level of function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive patients with single-level cervical disk disease, producing radiculopathy and/or myelopathy were randomly divided into groups to undergo ACDF or Discover arthroplasty. All patients were evaluated with preoperative and postoperative serial radiographic studies and clinically, using Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale and neurological status at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: The results of our study indicate that cervical arthroplasty using Discover Artificial Cervical Disc provides favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes in a follow-up period of 24 months. There has been significant improvement in clinical parameters, Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index, at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months in arthroplasty group comparing to control group.
CONCLUSION: The Discover artificial cervical disc replacement offers favorable outcome compared with ACDF for a single-level cervical disk disease at short-term and long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28525471     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  15 in total

Review 1.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Melvin C Makhni; Joseph A Osorio; Paul J Park; Joseph M Lombardi; Kiehyun Daniel Riew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Michael S Hisey; Jack E Zigler; Robert Jackson; Pierce D Nunley; Hyun W Bae; Kee D Kim; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study.

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Frode Kolstad; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Are Hugo Pripp; Hege Andresen; Erling Myrseth; Kay Müller; Øystein P Nygaard; John-Anker Zwart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.

Authors:  Michael D Staudt; Kaushik Das; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monish M Maharaj; Ralph J Mobbs; Jarred Hogan; Dong Fang Zhao; Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  So Kato; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhao-Ming Zhong; Shi-Yuan Zhu; Jing-Shen Zhuang; Qian Wu; Jian-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  Cervical total disc replacement is superior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yujie Zhang; Chengzhen Liang; Yiqing Tao; Xiaopeng Zhou; Hao Li; Fangcai Li; Qixin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in symptomatic cervical degenerative disc diseases (CDDDs): an updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Authors:  Lin Xie; Ming Liu; Fan Ding; Peng Li; Dezhang Ma
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.