Literature DB >> 27463707

Halichoblelide D, a New Elaiophylin Derivative with Potent Cytotoxic Activity from Mangrove-Derived Streptomyces sp. 219807.

Ying Han1, Erli Tian2, Dongbo Xu3, Min Ma4, Zixin Deng5, Kui Hong6.   

Abstract

During our search for interesting bioactive secondary metabolites from mangrove actinomycetes, the strain Streptomyces sp. 219807 which produced a high elaiophylin yield of 4486 mg/L was obtained. A new elaiophylin derivative, halichoblelide D (1), along with seven known analogues 2-8 was isolated and identified from the culture broth. Their chemical structures were determined by detailed analysis of 1D and 2D NMR and HRMS data. The absolute configuration of halichoblelide D (1) was confirmed by comparing the CD spectrum with those of the reported analogues. Compounds 1-7 exhibited potent cytotoxic activities against HeLa and MCF-7 cells with IC50 values ranging from 0.19 to 2.12 μM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Streptomyces sp. 219807; cytotoxic; elaiophylin; mangrove actinomycetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27463707      PMCID: PMC6273579          DOI: 10.3390/molecules21080970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

There is a continuous and urgent demand for iterative cycles of drug discovery and development to combat new emerging human diseases and multi-drug resistant pathogens [1,2]. Microbial natural products have delivered a plethora of structurally diverse specialized metabolites with potent pharmaceutical properties [3]. Microorganisms derived from underexplored habitats, such as mangrove ecosystems, are especially noteworthy, in part owing to their unique biosynthetic potential and the corresponding attenuation of the likelihood of finding high numbers of known compounds [4,5,6]. Mangrove ecosystems are extensively distributed in the interface between terrestrial and marine environments at tropical and subtropical latitudes, thereby suffering from extremely harsh stresses, including temperature, salinity, moisture and anoxia [7]. Therefore, mangrove-derived actinomycetes are distinct from terrestrial isolates in physiology and genotype to cope with the rigorous environments. Several decades of studies have demonstrated that actinomycetes recovered from mangrove systems are increasingly recognized as a vast reservoir of new bioactive natural products, such as salinosporamide A [8], xiamycins [9], and streptocarbazoles A and B [10]. Accordingly, our studies are focused on the mangrove ecosystem actinomycetes. After an initial cytotoxic screening of fermentation extracts of actinomycetes isolated from mangrove soil collected in Sanya, the active strain Streptomyces sp. 219807 was selected for further investigation. By means of HRMS match in the AntiBase 2012, elaiophylin and many unassigned elaiophylin-related compounds were successfully detected in the ethyl acetate extract of the fermentation broth. Elaiophylins are a family of glycosylated 16-membered macrolides featuring C2 symmetry produced by several Streptomyces spp. [11,12,13,14,15], which exhibit remarkable biological properties, such as antibacterial [16,17], anthelminthic [18], anticancer [19], antiviral [20] and immunosuppressant activities [21]. Chemical investigation of the bioactive extract led to the discovery of eight elaiophylins including a new derivative, halichoblelide D (1), together with 2-methyl-11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophylin (2), 2-methylelaiophylin (3), elaiophylin (4), 11-O-methyl-elaiophylin (5), 11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophylin (6), efomycin G (7) and 11′,12′-dehydroelaiophylin (8) (Figure 1). Details of their isolation, structure elucidation and bioactivities are reported herein.
Figure 1

Chemical structures of compounds 1–8.

2. Results

2.1. Structure Elucidation

Halichoblelide D (1) was obtained as a white needle-like crystals. Its molecular formula was determined as C49H80O15 by the negative HRESIMS at m/z 943.5183 [M + Cl]− (calc. for C49H80O15Cl−, 943.5186), implying 10 degrees of unsaturation. The UV (252 nm) and IR (1699, 1636 cm−1) absorption indicated the presence of an aliphatic conjugated ester system in the molecule [22]. A close inspection of the 1H-NMR (Table 1) and 1H-1H COSY spectra of 1 revealed the presence of two same sets of conjugated trans-dienes at δH 5.69 (1H, d, J = 15.4 Hz, H-2, H-2′), 6.99 (1H, dd, J = 15.3, 11.2 Hz, H-3, H-3′), 6.14 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 11.3 Hz, H-4, H-4′), 5.64 (1H, dd, J = 15.0, 9.6 Hz, H-5, H-5′), together with a methoxy moiety, eleven methyl groups, thirty sp3-hybridized methines and methylenes. The 13C-NMR and DEPT spectra illustrated characteristic signals attributable to two carbonyls at δC 170.3, 170.2, two same groups of olefinic methines at δC 121.2, 145.3, 132.3, 144.5, along with two hemiketal carbon at δC 99.3, 99.4. Through detailed analysis of NMR data, the fragments of 1 resembled those of the known compound elaiophylin (4) (please see Supplementary Materials Table S1 for the detailed data) in the macrodiolide ring, polyketide side chains, hemiketal rings and one sugar moiety, except that the 2-deoxy-l-fucose sugar unit in 4 was replaced with a methoxyl group at δH 3.34 (3H, s)/δC 56.7. The methoxyl group was attached to C-13′ based on the HMBC correlation (Figure 2), and thus the planar structure of 1 was identified.
Table 1

13C- and 1H-NMR data (500 MHz, CDCl3) for 1.

PositionsδCδH (J in Hz)PositionsδCδH (J in Hz)
1170.3 s-1′170.2 s-
2121.2 d5.69 (d, 15.4)2′121.2 d5.69 (d, 15.4)
3145.3 d6.99 (dd, 15.3, 11.2)3′145.3 d6.99 (dd, 15.3, 11.2)
4132.3 d6.14 (dd, 15.1, 11.3)4′132.3 d6.14 (dd, 15.1, 11.3)
5144.5 d5.64 (dd, 15.0, 9.6)5′144.5 d5.64 (dd, 15.0, 9.6)
641.0 d2.54 (m)6′41.0 d2.54 (m)
778.1 d4.72 (d, 10.3)7′77.4 d4.72 (d, 10.3)
836.1 d1.95 (m)8′36.1 d1.95 (m)
970.9 d4.10 (m)9′70.8 d4.10 (m)
9-OH 4.12 (overlapped) 4.12 (overlapped)
1041.8 d1.70 (t, 7.5)10′41.8 d1.70 (t, 7.5)
1199.3 s-11′99.4 d-
11-OH 5.30 (d, 2.0) 5.23 (d, 1.9)
1239.1 t1.00 (m)2.37 (dd, 11.9, 4.5)12′39.1 t1.00 (m)2.45 (dd, 12.0, 4.5)
1370.4 d3.95 (m)13′76.1 d3.47 (td, 10.7, 4.7)
1448.6 d1.18 (m)14′49.3 d1.13 (m)
1566.7 d3.91 (m)15′67.3 d3.85 (m)
1619.5 q1.09 (d, 6.2)16′19.4 q1.08 (d, 6.3)
1715.1 q1.03 (d, 6.6)17′15.1 q1.03 (d, 6.6)
188.9 q0.81 (d, 6.8)18′8.9 q0.81 (d, 6.8)
197.3 q0.99 (d, 7.2)19′7.3 q0.99 (d, 7.2)
2019.6 t1.43 (m); 1.60 (m)20′19.6 t1.43 (m); 1.60 (m)
219.3 q0.83 (t, 7.5)21′10.2 q0.86 (t, 7.5)
2293.4 d5.03 (t, 2.1)13′-OCH356.7 q3.34 (s)
2333.8 t1.78 (dd, 8.6, 2.4)
2466.1 d3.97 (m)
2571.7 d3.60 (br s)
2666.3 d3.98 (m)
2717.0 q1.23 (d, 6.6)
Figure 2

Selected HMBC and COSY correlations of compound 1 in CDCl3.

The measured vicinal coupling constants of the protons and NOESY correlations (Figure S6) are observed to be closely resembled those of the known halichoblelide B [23], allowing the assignment of the relative stereochemistry of 1. Furthermore, the absolute configuration of 1 was concluded to be the same with halichoblelide B due to the nearly superimposable Cotton effects [23]. Therefore, the structure of compound 1 was determined as 13′-de-2-deoxy-l-fucose-13′-O-methylelaiophylin (Figure 2) and named as halichoblelide D following the examples of halichoblelide B and C [23]. Seven known metabolites were also isolated in this investigation and respectively identified as 2-methyl-11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophylin (2) [24], 2-methylelaiophylin (3) [24], elaiophylin (4) [11,19], 11-O-methylelaiophylin (5) [16], 11,11′-O-dimethylelaiophylin (6) [16], efomycin G (7) [14] and 11′,12′-dehydroelaiophylin (8) [17] by comparing their spectral data with the reported literature.

2.2. Yield of Elaiophylin in Shake-Flask Fermentation under Laboratory Conditions

Strain 219807 has been cultured on 18 different media available in our lab, and was found to produce the highest yield of elaiophylin on DO medium (50 mL in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask), the yield of elaiophylin (4) measured by HPLC was calculated based on its standard curve [25]. The regression equation of elaiophylin was obtained as y = 630x − 1.6007, and the calibration curve showed good linearity (R2 = 0.9993) (Figure S11). According to the equation, the yield of elaiophylin reached 4486 mg/L in shake-flask fermentation under laboratory conditions, which was significantly more (>2 fold) than the highest yield reported before [26]. This high yield was primarily dependent on the strain of the microorganism. The proper medium DO which contained a complex carbon sources as observed by other reports [27,28] also contributed to the high production.

2.3. Cytotoxic Activity of Compounds

Compounds 1–7 showed potent activities against human cervical carcinoma HeLa and breast cancer MCF-7 cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 0.19 to 2.12 μM (Table 2). Remarkably, the new compound 1 exhibited cytotoxic activities against HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines with IC50 values of 0.30 and 0.33 μM, respectively. Compound 8 was not evaluated in cytotoxicity assays for the scarcity of material.
Table 2

Cytotoxicities of compounds 1–7 against HeLa and MCF-7 cells.

CompoundsIC50 (μM)
HeLaMCF-7
10.30.33
21.122.12
30.290.29
40.290.19
4–6 a0.570.96
70.590.79
5-Fluorouracil770770

a Compounds 4, 5 and 6 could partly interconvert when dissolved in MeOH [24].

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Procedures

Optical rotations were measured using a 341 polarimeter (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). UV spectra were recorded on a UV-2600 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). IR spectra were obtained from Nicolet Nexus 470 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 1D and 2D NMR spectra were determined with AM-400 and DRX-500 spectrometers (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) using TMS as the internal standard. Circular dichroism spectra were recorded with a Chirascan spectropolarimeter (Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, UK). High-resolution mass spectrometric (HRMS) data were measured on a linear trapquadrupole (LTQ)-Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Analytical HPLC was carried out on a Waters 2998 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The semi-preparative HPLC instrument used (Agilent 1260 Infinity, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was equipped with an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 column (250 mm × 9.4 mm, 5 μm). Thin-layer chromatography was conducted on precoated silica gel 60 GF254 plates (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical, Qingdao, China) and column chromatography was performed using silica gel (200–300 mesh; Qingdao Haiyang Chemical). 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-z-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (Amresco, Cleveland, OH, USA) and 5-fluorouracil (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) were employed for cytotoxicity assays. An Infinite M200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland) was used for measuring the absorbance.

3.2. Material and Fermentation

The strain 219807 was isolated from mangrove soil collected in Sanya, Hainan Province, China and characterized as Streptomyces sp. by 16S rRNA sequence (GenBank accession number HQ992731). A voucher specimen was deposited in the Key Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery (Wuhan University, Wuhan, China), Ministry of Education, and Wuhan University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (http://pharmacy.whu.edu.cn/NewsDetail.asp?MaxSort=xygk&MaxUrl=about&id=450) and the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC No:M 2015276). The strain was pre-cultured on ISP2 agar medium (0.4% glucose, 0.4% yeast extract, 1% malt extract, pH 7.0, supplemented with 2% agar) for 5–7 days. A single colony was inoculated into 50 mL of ISP2 liquid medium in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks on a rotatory shaker (220 rpm) at 28 °C for 3 days. Subsequently, 10 mL of seed culture was inoculated to 1 L Erlenmeyer flask containing 250 mL of DO fermentation medium (1% glucose, 2.5% dextrin, 2% oatmeal, 1% cottonseed flour, 0.5% fish meal, 0.2% yeast extract, 0.3% CaCO3, pH 6.0). Total 5 L of the fermentation broth was incubated for 8 days at 220 rpm and 28 °C. The highest yield of elaiophylin (4) was obtained while using 50 mL liquid culture of DO medium in 250 mL flask, observed by HPLC and calculated based on its standard curve [25].

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The fermentation broth was separated into the mycelium and supernatant after centrifuging at 12,000× g for 1 h at 4 °C. The mycelium was disrupted by 80% acetone aqueous solution through ultrasonication for three times and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield 10.0 g of crude extract. The extract was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using gradient elution with cyclohexane and acetone mixture (v/v, 90:10–0:100) to afford nine fractions: A1–A9. Fraction A5 was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (3 mL/min, UV detection at 252 nm) with a gradient of CH3CN (A)/H2O (B) (0–5 min, 65% A; 5–6 min, 65%–80% A; 6–14 min, 80% A; 14–15 min, 80%–95% A; 15–19 min, 95% A; 19–20 min, 95%–100% A; 20–23 min, 100% A; 23–25 min, 65% A), to yield 1 (2.8 mg, t 23.6 min). Fraction A7 was purified by reversed-phase HPLC with a gradient of CH3CN (A)/H2O (B) (0–12 min, 79% A; 12–13 min, 79%–90% A; 13–29 min, 90% A; 29–30 min, 90%–79% A; 30–38 min, 79% A) to afford six subfractions A7A–A7F. Pure compounds 4 (75.3 mg, t 5.5 min), 5 (170.2 mg, t 14.1 min) and 6 (386.2 mg, t 34.0 min) were directly obtained from A7A, A7B and A7E, respectively. Subfraction A7C was further purified by reverse-phase HPLC eluted with CH3CN/H2O (64:36) to give 8 (2.8 mg, t 10.0 min). Subfraction A7D was separated by reverse-phase HPLC with an isocratic solvent system of CH3CN/H2O (53:47) to obtain 7 (15.2 mg, t 10.5 min). Subfraction A7F was subjected to reversed-phase HPLC with a gradient of CH3CN (A)/H2O (B) (0–4 min, 80% A; 4–5 min, 80%–87% A; 5–12 min, 87% A; 12–13 min, 87%–99% A; 13–25 min, 99% A; 25–26 min, 99%–80% A; 26–30 min, 80% A) to afford 3 (5.1 mg, t 13.1 min) and 2 (15.2 mg, t 28.4 min). 13′-De-2-deoxy- (Halichoblelide D, 1): White needle-like crystals (2.8 mg), [α] −3.36 (c 0.055, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 252 (4.29) nm; IR (νmax cm−1) 3523, 3445, 3333, 2977, 2931, 1699, 1636, 1458, 1382, 1302, 1222, 1184, 1088, 981, 807, 743, 695, 641, 567; CD (MeOH) 213 (Δε −14.2), 250 (Δε −34.9), 279 (Δε +23.9); HRESIMS: m/z 943.5183 [M + Cl]− (calc. for C49H80O15Cl−, 943.5186). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.69 (1H, d, J = 15.4 Hz, H-2), 6.99 (1H, dd, J = 15.3, 11.2 Hz, H-3), 6.14 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 11.3 Hz, H-4), 5.64 (1H, dd, J = 15.0, 9.6 Hz, H-5), 2.54 (1H, m, H-6), 4.72 (1H, d, J = 10.3 Hz, H-7), 1.95 (1H, m, H-8), 4.10 (1H, m, H-9), 4.12 (1H, overlapped, 9-OH), 1.70 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-10), 5.30 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, 11-OH), 1.00 (1H, m, H-12a), 2.37 (1H, dd, J = 11.9, 4.5 Hz, H-12b), 3.95 (1H, m, H-13), 1.18 (1H, m, H-14), 3.91 (1H, m, H-15), 1.09 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H-16), 1.03 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H-17), 0.81 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, H-18), 0.99 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, H-19), 1.43 (1H, m, H-20a); 1.60 (1H, m, H-20b), 0.83 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-21), 5.03 (1H, t, J = 2.1 Hz, H-22), 1.78 (2H, dd, J = 8.6, 2.4 Hz, H-23), 3.97 (1H, m, H-24), 3.60 (1H, br s, H-25), 3.98 (1H, m, H-26), 1.23 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H-27), 5.69 (1H, d, J = 15.4 Hz, H-2′), 6.99 (1H, dd, J = 15.3, 11.2 Hz, H-3′), 6.14 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 11.3 Hz, H-4′), 5.64 (1H, dd, J = 15.0, 9.6 Hz, H-5′), 2.54 (1H, m, H-6′), 4.72 (1H, d, J = 10.3 Hz, H-7′), 1.95 (1H, m, H-8′), 4.10 (1H, m, H-9′), 4.12 (1H, overlapped, 9′-OH), 1.70 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-10′), 5.23 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, 11′-OH), 1.00 (1H, m, H-12′a), 2.45 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 4.5 Hz, H-12b), 3.47 (1H, td, J = 10.7, 4.7 Hz, H-13′), 1.13 (1H, m, H-14′), 3.85 (1H, m, H-15′), 1.08 (3H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, H-16′), 1.03 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H-17′), 0.81 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, H-18′), 0.99 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, H-19′), 1.43 (1H, m, H-20′a); 1.60 (1H, m, H-20′b), 0.86 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-21′), 3.34 (3H, s, 13′-OCH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ170.3 (C-1), 170.2 (C-1′), 121.2(C-2, 2′), 145.3 (C-3, C-3′), 132.3 (C-4, C-4′), 144.5 (C-5, C-5′), 41.0 (C-6, C-6′), 78.1 (C-7), 77.4 (C-7′), 36.1 (C-8, C-8′), 70.9 (C-9), 70.8 (C-9′), 41.8 (C-10, C-10′), 99.3 (C-11), 99.4 (C-11′), 39.1 (C-12, C-12′), 70.4 (C-13), 76.1 (C-13′), 56.7 (13′-OCH3), 48.6 (C-14), 49.3 (C-14′), 66.7 (C-15), 67.3 (C-15′),19.5 (C-16), 19.4 (C-16′), 15.1 (C-17, C-17′), 8.9 (C-18, C-18′), 7.3 (C-19, C-19′), 19.6 (C-20, C-20′), 9.3 (C-21), 10.2 (C-21′), 93.4 (C-22), 33.8 (C-23), 66.1 (C-24), 71.7 (C-25), 66.3 (C-26), 17.0 (C-27).

3.4. Cytotoxic Activity Assay

Compounds 1–7 were evaluated for cytotoxic effects against HeLa and MCF-7 cells according to the previously described MTT method [29],. The absorbance at 570 nm was determined on a Tecan Infinite M200 Pro reader, and the reference wavelength was 690 nm. The experiment was conducted in triplicate. 5-Fluorouracil was employed as positive control.

4. Conclusions

Eight a group of elaiophylins comprised of a new derivative, halichoblelide D (1), together with seven known compounds 2–8 was isolated and identified from mangrove-derived Streptomyces sp. 219807. Compounds 1–7 displayed significant cytotoxic activities against HeLa and MCF-7 cells with IC50 values 0.19–2.12 μM, and were thus promising candidates for future development of antineoplastic drugs. Notably, the strain possesses the capacity of producing elaiophylin (4) reaching the hitherto highest yield (4486 mg/L) reported at lab scale.
  8 in total

1.  Imaging mass spectrometry and MS/MS molecular networking reveals chemical interactions among cuticular bacteria and pathogenic fungi associated with fungus-growing ants.

Authors:  Cristopher A Boya P; Hermógenes Fernández-Marín; Luis C Mejía; Carmenza Spadafora; Pieter C Dorrestein; Marcelino Gutiérrez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Natural Products Research in China From 2015 to 2016.

Authors:  Haishan Liu; Guoliang Zhu; Yaqin Fan; Yuqi Du; Mengmeng Lan; Yibo Xu; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 3.  Simple glycolipids of microbes: Chemistry, biological activity and metabolic engineering.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohammad Abdel-Mawgoud; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-15

4.  Diversity, Novelty, and Antimicrobial Activity of Endophytic Actinobacteria From Mangrove Plants in Beilun Estuary National Nature Reserve of Guangxi, China.

Authors:  Zhong-Ke Jiang; Li Tuo; Da-Lin Huang; Ilya A Osterman; Anton P Tyurin; Shao-Wei Liu; Dmitry A Lukyanov; Petr V Sergiev; Olga A Dontsova; Vladimir A Korshun; Fei-Na Li; Cheng-Hang Sun
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Antiangiogenic Potential of Microbial Metabolite Elaiophylin for Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Haet Nim Lim; Jun-Pil Jang; Jang Mi Han; Jae-Hyuk Jang; Jong Seog Ahn; Hye Jin Jung
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Natural Occurrence, Bioactivity and Biosynthesis of Elaiophylin Analogues.

Authors:  Min Gui; Meng-Xue Zhang; Wen-Hui Wu; Peng Sun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Lead Compounds from Mangrove-Associated Microorganisms.

Authors:  Elena Ancheeva; Georgios Daletos; Peter Proksch
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 8.  Anticancer Drug Discovery from Microbial Sources: The Unique Mangrove Streptomycetes.

Authors:  Jodi Woan-Fei Law; Lydia Ngiik-Shiew Law; Vengadesh Letchumanan; Loh Teng-Hern Tan; Sunny Hei Wong; Kok-Gan Chan; Nurul-Syakima Ab Mutalib; Learn-Han Lee
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.