| Literature DB >> 27462308 |
Amel Ismail1, Leila Ktari1, Mehboob Ahmed2, Henk Bolhuis3, Abdellatif Boudabbous4, Lucas J Stal5, Mariana Silvia Cretoiu3, Monia El Bour1.
Abstract
Macroalgae belonging to the genus Padina are known to produce antibacterial compounds that may inhibit growth of human- and animal pathogens. Hitherto, it was unclear whether this antibacterial activity is produced by the macroalga itself or by secondary metabolite producing epiphytic bacteria. Here we report antibacterial activities of epiphytic bacteria isolated from Padina pavonica (Peacocks tail) located on northern coast of Tunisia. Eighteen isolates were obtained in pure culture and tested for antimicrobial activities. Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences the isolates were closely related to Proteobacteria (12 isolates; 2 Alpha- and 10 Gammaproteobacteria), Firmicutes (4 isolates) and Actinobacteria (2 isolates). The antimicrobial activity was assessed as inhibition of growth of 12 species of pathogenic bacteria (Aeromonas salmonicida, A. hydrophila, Enterobacter xiangfangensis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus sp., Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus sp., Vibrio alginoliticus, V. proteolyticus, V. vulnificus) and one pathogenic yeast (Candida albicans). Among the Firmicutes, isolate P8, which is closely related to Bacillus pumilus, displayed the largest spectrum of growth inhibition of the pathogenic bacteria tested. The results emphasize the potential use of P. pavonica associated antagonistic bacteria as producers of novel antibacterial compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus pumilus; Padina pavonica; antibiotics; epibionts; seaweed
Year: 2016 PMID: 27462308 PMCID: PMC4940378 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Primers used for PCR and DNA sequencing.
| B8F | AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG |
| U1492R | GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT |
| C5 | AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAGG |
| C26 | GGGCGGTGTGTACAAGG |
| C72 | CCGGAATIATTGGGCGTAA |
| C112 | CTCGTTGCGGGACTTAACCC |
Identification of 18 bacterial strains associated with .
| P1 | 98 | Alphaproteobacteria | ||
| P2 | 99 | Alphaproteobacteria | ||
| P3 | 99 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P4 | 96 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P5 | 98 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P6 | 96 | Actinobacteria | ||
| P7 | 97 | Firmicutes | ||
| P8 | 99 | Firmicutes | ||
| P9 | 93 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P11 | 95 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P12 | 100 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P14 | 94 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P17 | 95 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P18 | 100 | Firmicutes | ||
| P19 | 98 | Actinobacteria | ||
| P20 | 100 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P26 | 99 | Gammaproteobacteria | ||
| P27 | 88 | Firmicutes |
Antibacterial and antifungal activities of isolate P8, P9, P11, P12, and P20 against pathogen bacteria.
| + | ++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| ++ | +++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| ++ | +++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| + | + | + | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| + | +++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| + | ++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| ++ | ++++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| + | +++ | + | ++ | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | |
| + | +++ | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ++ | |
| +++ | ++++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |
| + | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | |
| ++ | ++++ | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | ++ | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | |
| ++ | +++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
D, Drop method; O, overlay method; Inhibition zones > to 25 mm were declared as very strong (++++), Inhibition zones from 15 to 25 mm as strong (+++), from 7 to 15 as moderate (++) and < 7 as weak activities (+), no activity (−).
Figure 1Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from P9, P11, and P20 isolates and Pseudomonas genus (B) P8 isolate and Bacillus genus (C) P12 isolate and Pseudoalteromonas genus.
Figure 2Plates testing antimicrobial activity of strain P8 isolated from .
Antagonistic activity of isolate P8 against sensitive .
| +++ | |
| + | |
| ++ | |
| +++ |
Inhibition zones from 15 to 25 mm were considered strong (+++), from 7 to 15 moderate (++) and < 7 weak activities (+).
Effects of enzymatic and heat treatments on antibacterial activity of .
| P8 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| P9 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| P11 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| P12 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − |
| P20 | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − |
S, supernatant; T, supernatant treated by trypsin; P, supernatant treated by pepsin; T1, supernatant heated at 60°C; T2, supernatant heated at 80°C; T3, supernatant heated at 100°C. +, active; −, not active.
Figure 3Influence of supernatant heating treatment on the P8 antibacterial activity against .
Figure 4Comparison between .
Biological activities of .
| Marine bacterial pathogens | Hill et al., | |
| Prieto et al., | ||
| Gram positive and Gram negative fouling bacteria; | Kanagasabhapathy et al., | |
| Ismail-Ben Ali et al., | ||
| Soil | Hasan et al., | |
| Soil | Bacitracin (peptide) active against | Awais et al., |
| Endophytic bacteria from ethnovarieties of cassava | Active against the fungi | Pereira de Melo et al., |
| Lipopeptide biosurfactants (LPBSs) from | Agriculture, chemical, food, and pharmaceutical industries | Roongsawang et al., |
| Soil and water samples | Pumilicin 4, inhibits several Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA and VRE | Aunpad and Na-Bangchang, |
| Soil | Sawale et al., | |
| Clinical specimens | Fungicidal activity against Mucoraceae and | Bottone and Peluso, |
| Soil | Kuta et al., |
MRSA, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRE, Vancomycin-Resistant-Enterococci; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.