M W Long1, Z J Ward2, S C Resch2, A L Cradock3, Y C Wang4, C M Giles3, S L Gortmaker3. 1. Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. 2. Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: State-specific obesity prevalence data are critical to public health efforts to address the childhood obesity epidemic. However, few states administer objectively measured body mass index (BMI) surveillance programs. This study reports state-specific childhood obesity prevalence by age and sex correcting for parent-reported child height and weight bias. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: As part of the Childhood Obesity Intervention Cost Effectiveness Study (CHOICES), we developed childhood obesity prevalence estimates for states for the period 2005-2010 using data from the 2010 US Census and American Community Survey (ACS), 2003-2004 and 2007-2008 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) (n=133 213), and 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (n=9377; ages 2-17). Measured height and weight data from NHANES were used to correct parent-report bias in NSCH using a non-parametric statistical matching algorithm. Model estimates were validated against surveillance data from five states (AR, FL, MA, PA and TN) that conduct censuses of children across a range of grades. RESULTS: Parent-reported height and weight resulted in the largest overestimation of childhood obesity in males ages 2-5 years (NSCH: 42.36% vs NHANES: 11.44%). The CHOICES model estimates for this group (12.81%) and for all age and sex categories were not statistically different from NHANES. Our modeled obesity prevalence aligned closely with measured data from five validation states, with a 0.64 percentage point mean difference (range: 0.23-1.39) and a high correlation coefficient (r=0.96, P=0.009). Estimated state-specific childhood obesity prevalence ranged from 11.0 to 20.4%. CONCLUSION: Uncorrected estimates of childhood obesity prevalence from NSCH vary widely from measured national data, from a 278% overestimate among males aged 2-5 years to a 44% underestimate among females aged 14-17 years. This study demonstrates the validity of the CHOICES matching methods to correct the bias of parent-reported BMI data and highlights the need for public release of more recent data from the 2011 to 2012 NSCH.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: State-specific obesity prevalence data are critical to public health efforts to address the childhood obesity epidemic. However, few states administer objectively measured body mass index (BMI) surveillance programs. This study reports state-specific childhood obesity prevalence by age and sex correcting for parent-reported child height and weight bias. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: As part of the Childhood Obesity Intervention Cost Effectiveness Study (CHOICES), we developed childhood obesity prevalence estimates for states for the period 2005-2010 using data from the 2010 US Census and American Community Survey (ACS), 2003-2004 and 2007-2008 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) (n=133 213), and 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (n=9377; ages 2-17). Measured height and weight data from NHANES were used to correct parent-report bias in NSCH using a non-parametric statistical matching algorithm. Model estimates were validated against surveillance data from five states (AR, FL, MA, PA and TN) that conduct censuses of children across a range of grades. RESULTS: Parent-reported height and weight resulted in the largest overestimation of childhood obesity in males ages 2-5 years (NSCH: 42.36% vs NHANES: 11.44%). The CHOICES model estimates for this group (12.81%) and for all age and sex categories were not statistically different from NHANES. Our modeled obesity prevalence aligned closely with measured data from five validation states, with a 0.64 percentage point mean difference (range: 0.23-1.39) and a high correlation coefficient (r=0.96, P=0.009). Estimated state-specific childhood obesity prevalence ranged from 11.0 to 20.4%. CONCLUSION: Uncorrected estimates of childhood obesity prevalence from NSCH vary widely from measured national data, from a 278% overestimate among males aged 2-5 years to a 44% underestimate among females aged 14-17 years. This study demonstrates the validity of the CHOICES matching methods to correct the bias of parent-reported BMI data and highlights the need for public release of more recent data from the 2011 to 2012 NSCH.
Authors: Steven L Gortmaker; Y Claire Wang; Michael W Long; Catherine M Giles; Zachary J Ward; Jessica L Barrett; Erica L Kenney; Kendrin R Sonneville; Amna Sadaf Afzal; Stephen C Resch; Angie L Cradock Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Aaron S Kelly; Sarah E Barlow; Goutham Rao; Thomas H Inge; Laura L Hayman; Julia Steinberger; Elaine M Urbina; Linda J Ewing; Stephen R Daniels Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephen J Blumberg; Erin B Foster; Alicia M Frasier; Jennifer Satorius; Ben J Skalland; Kari L Nysse-Carris; Heather M Morrison; Sadeq R Chowdhury; Kathleen S O'Connor Journal: Vital Health Stat 1 Date: 2012-06
Authors: Kelly J Blondin; Catherine M Giles; Angie L Cradock; Steven L Gortmaker; Michael W Long Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Zachary J Ward; Michael W Long; Stephen C Resch; Steven L Gortmaker; Angie L Cradock; Catherine Giles; Amber Hsiao; Y Claire Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Madeleine I G Daepp; Steven L Gortmaker; Y Claire Wang; Michael W Long; Erica L Kenney Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: T Dylan Olver; Zachary I Grunewald; Thomas J Jurrissen; Rebecca E K MacPherson; Paul J LeBlanc; Teagan R Schnurbusch; Alana M Czajkowski; M Harold Laughlin; R Scott Rector; Shawn B Bender; Eric M Walters; Craig A Emter; Jaume Padilla Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Zachary J Ward; Michael W Long; Stephen C Resch; Catherine M Giles; Angie L Cradock; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Erica L Kenney; Jessica L Barrett; Sara N Bleich; Zachary J Ward; Angie L Cradock; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 6.301